Advertisement

Speech Correlates of Stress and Coping

  • Hans Steiner
  • Thomas F. Anders

Abstract

After several decades of dedicated research, the precise relationship between psychological and physiological components of acute stress response is still not known (Elliott et al., 1982). The problem is of particular interest for three reasons:
  1. (1)

    Psychological stimuli are among the most powerful activators of physiological stress responses (Mason, 1975).

     
  2. (2)

    Coping and defense mechanisms are able to protect the organism from arousal (Lazarus, 1964) or even prevent lethal consequences of hormonal stress response (MacLennan et al., 1983).

     
  3. (3)

    Without proper knowledge of the relationship between these variables, significant progress in stress response is unlikely. Individual responses show a wide variability, impeding experimental exploration. It is thought that this variability is at least in part a function of the large number of unknown mediators in the response. And, in turn, a great number of those mediators are psychological (Elliott et al., 1982).

     

Keywords

Physiological Stress Response Mature Defense Hormonal Stress Response Acute Stress Response Defense Style 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bond, M., Gardner, S. T., Christian, J., and Sigal, J. J., 1983, Empirical study of self-rated defense styles, Archives of Gen Psychiatry, 40:333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Elliott, G. R., and Eisdorfer, C., 1982, “Stress and Human Health,” Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Gottschalk, L. A., 1977, Quantification and psychological indicators of emotions: the content analysis of speech and other objective measures of psychological states, in: “Psychosomatic Medicine,” Z. J. Lipowski, ed., Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Harper, R. G., Wiens, A. N., and Matarazzo, J. D., 1978, “Nonverbal Communication — The State of the Art,” Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Lazarus, R. S., and Alfert, E., 1964, Short circuiting of threat by experimentally altering cognitive appraisal, J Abnorm Soc Psychol, 69:195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Mahl, G. F., 1963, The lexical and linguistic levels in the expression of the emotions, in: “Expression of the Emotions in Man,” P. H. Knapp, ed., International University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Mason, J. W., 1975, Emotion as reflected in patterns of endocrine integration, in: “Emotions — Their Parameters and Measurement,” L. Levi, ed., Raven Press, New York.Google Scholar
  8. MacLennan, J., and Maier, S. F., 1983, Coping and the stress-induced potentiation of stimulant stereotypy in the past, Science, 219:1091.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Miyabo, S., Asato, T., and Mitushima, N., 1979, Psychological correlates of stress-induced Cortisol and growth hormone releases in neurotic patients, Psychosom Med, 41:515.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Moos, R. H., 1974, Psychological techniques in the assessment of adaptive behavior, in: “Coping and Adaptation,” G. V. Coelho, ed., Basic, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Scherer, K. R., 1981, Vocal indicators of stress, in: “Speech Evaluation in Psychiatry,” J. K. Darby, ed., Grune and Stratton, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Vaillant, G. E., 1977, “Adaptation to Life,” Little, Brown and Co., Boston.Google Scholar
  13. Weintraub, W., 1981, “Verbal Behavior: Adaptation and Psychopathology,” Springer, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans Steiner
    • 1
  • Thomas F. Anders
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesStanford University School of MedicineStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations