Ligand Hyperfine Couplings and the Structure of Transition-Metal Complexes

  • Robert G. Hayes


Hyperfine couplings arising from nuclei in the ligands of transition metal complexes have been known for some fifteen years now and have from the first been valuable sources of information on covalency in such species. Within the past few years, however, many new results on ligand hyperfine couplings have been obtained, primarily by ESR. In particular, it has been shown in several systems that the often-invoked back donation or π covalency in cyanides is largely nonexistent, and the detection of ligand hyperfine couplings has verified, in several cases, an energy level scheme which puts the unpaired electron(s) in an orbital which is localized mainly on the ligands. A brief discussion of the detection and analysis of ligand hyperfine couplings will be followed by several examples of interest.


Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Unpaired Electron Hyperfine Coupling ENDOR Spectrum Energy Level Scheme 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J. Owen and K. W. H. Stevens, Nature 171, 836 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. G. Shulman and V. Jaccarino, Phys. Rev. 42, 666 (1956).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. C. Kravitz and W. W. Piper, Phys. Rev. 146, 322 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Owen and J. H. M. Thornley, Rep. Prog. Phys. (London) 29, 675 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. P. P. Hall, W. Hayes, R. W. H. Stevenson, and J. Wilkens, J. Chem. Phys. 38, 1977 (1963); H. M. Gladney, Phys. Rev. 143, 198 (1966); R. G. Hayes, J. Chem. Phys. 47, 1692 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    W. Marshall, in: Paramagnetic Resonance, Vol. 1, W. Low, ed. ( Academic Press, New York, 1963 ).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. H. M. Thornley, C. G. Windor, and J. Owen, Proc. Roy. Soc. 248A, 252 (1965).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. R. Morton, Chem. Rev. 64, 453 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. M. Hurd and P. Coodin, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 28, 523 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. Clementi, IBM J. Res. Dey. 9, 2 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. J. Freeman and R. E. Watson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 6 343 (1961).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. E. Harrison and J. M. Assour, in: Paramagnetic Resonance, Vol. 2, W. Low, ed. ( Academic Press, New York, 1963 ).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    B. R. McGarvey Inorg. Chem. 5476 (1966).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Danon, H. Panepucci, and A. A. Misetich, J. Chem. Phys. 44, 4154 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. D. W. van Voorst and P. Hemmerich, J. Chem. Phys. 45, 3914 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. Danon, R. P. A. Muniz, and O. A. Caride J. Chem. Phys. 46 1210 (1967).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    L. Garber, Department of Chemistry, Notre Dame University, unpublished observations.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1969

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert G. Hayes
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of Notre DameNotre DameUSA

Personalised recommendations