An Evaluation of Some Chiral Stationary Phases for the Separation of β-Blocker Drugs

  • G. A. Kingston
  • D. Stevenson
Part of the Chromatographic Society Symposium Series book series (CSSS)


Three different chiral stationary phases have been evaluated for their ability to resolve racemic propranolol and other β-blocker drugs. Cyclobond 1 was not successful in separating underivatised propranolol. αl-Acid glycoprotein successfully separated the drugs atenolol, alprenolol, metoprolol, oxprenolol, practolol, pronethalol and propranolol into their enantiomers. Separations for propranolol, pronethalol, oxprenolol, metoprolol and alprenolol as their 1- or 2-naphthamide derivatives were achieved on a covalent 3,5-dinitrobenzoyl phenylglycine phase. The derivatisation reaction was rapid and quantitive.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    A. M. Barrett and. A. Cullum, Br. J. Pharmac., 34: 43–50 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    B. Silber, N. H. G. Holford and S. Riegelman, J. Pharm. Sci., 71: 699–703 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. S. Olanoff, T. Wale, T. D. Cowart, U. K. Walle, M. J. Oexmann and E. C. Conradi, Clin. Pharm. Ther., 40: 408–414 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. W. Armstrong, T. J. Ward, R D. Armstrong and T. E. Beesley, Science, 232: 11311135 (1986).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Schill, I. W. Wainer and S. A. Barkan, J. Chromatogr., 365: 73–88 (1986).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Hermansson, J. Chromatogr., 325: 379–384 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R J. Straka, R L. Lalonde and I. W. Wainer, Pharmaceut Res., 5: 187–189 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    W. H. Pirkle, J. M. Finn, J. L. Schreiner and B. C. Hamper, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 103: 3964–3966 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    I. W. Wainer, T. D. Doyle, K. H. Dorm nd J. R Powell, J. Chromatogr., 306: 405–411 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. H. Dorm, J. R Powell and I. W. Wainer, Clin. Pharm. Ther., 37: 191 (1985).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    O. Gyllenhaal, W. A. Konig and J. Vesman, J. Chromatogr., 350: 328–331 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. B. Gupta, J. W. Hubbard and K. K. Midha, J. Chromatogr., 424: 189–194 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. Pettersson, A. Karlsson and C. Gioelli, J. Chromatogr., 407: 217–229 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. Gubitz and S. Mihellyes, J. Chromatogr., 314: 462–466 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. J. Wilson and T. Walle, J. Chromatogr., 310: 424–430 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    T. Walle, D. D. Christ, U. K. Wale and M. J. Wilson, J. Chromatogr., 341: 213–216 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    G. Pfugmann, H. Spahn and E. Mutschler, J. Chromatogr., 416: 331–339 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    I. W. Wainer, Trends in Anal. Chem., 6: 125–134 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    K. G. Feitsiva, J. Bosman, B. F. H. Drenth and R A. De Zeeuw, J. Chromatogr., 333: 5968 (1985).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    W. H. Pirkle and C. J. Welch, J. Org. Chem, 49: 138–140 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    W. H. Pirkle, C. J. Welch and M. H. Hyun, J. Org. Chem., 48: 5022–5026 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    J. Hermansson, J. Chromatogr., 269: 71–80 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. A. Kingston
    • 1
  • D. Stevenson
    • 1
  1. 1.Robens Institute of Health and SafetyUniversity of SurreyGuildford, SurreyUK

Personalised recommendations