Advertisement

Disorders of Self: Myths, Metaphors, and the Demand Characteristics of Treatment

  • Martin T. Orne
  • Nancy K. Bauer-Manley

Abstract

Poets and philosophers have long been aware that the healthy individual’s personality or “self” is far from a monolithic structure free of inconsistencies and ambivalence, and the myth of the truly consistent self has been thoroughly challenged as well by the social and behavioral sciences. William James and the early self theorists (see Cooley, 1902; James, 1890) realized that much emotion, and indeed, much motivation, results from inconsistencies and conflicts within the self and especially within the self-concept. George Herbert Mead (1934) followed their lead in recognizing that not only is the self complex and to some degree conflicted, but it also is necessarily malleable by virtue of its variety of social contexts; fluid interactions between the individual and his or her social environment continually shape and modify the self.

Keywords

Demand Characteristic Multiple Personality Professional Skepticism Transactional Analysis Multiple Personality Disorder 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., revised). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  3. Bliss, E. L. (1988). Professional skepticism about multiple personality. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 173, 522–526.Google Scholar
  4. Boor, M. (1982). The multiple personality epidemic: Additional cases and inferences regarding diagnosis, etiology, dynamics, and treatment. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 170, 302–304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boor, M., & Coons, P. M. (1983). A comprehensive bibliography of literature pertaining to multiple personality. Psychological Reports, 53, 295–310.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braun, B. G. (1984). Hypnosis creates multiple personality: Myth or reality? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 32, 191–197.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Braun, B. G. (1986). Issues in the psychotherapy of multiple personality disorder. In B. G. Braun (Ed.), Treatment of multiple personality disorder (pp. 1–28 ). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
  9. Coons, P. M. (1986a). Child abuse and multiple personality disorder: Review of the literature and suggestions for treatment. Child Abuse and Neglect, 10, 455–465.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coons, P. M. (1986b). The prevalence of multiple personality disorder. Newsletter of the International Society for the Study of Multiple Personality and Dissociation, 4, (3), 6–8.Google Scholar
  11. Ellenberger, H. (1970). The discovery of the unconscious. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  12. Frankel, F. H. (1976). Hypnosis: Trance as a coping mechanism. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  13. Freud, S. (1923). The Ego and the Id. (trans. J. Riviere ). New York: Norton, 1962.Google Scholar
  14. Freud, S. (1933). New Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis. (trans. J. Strachey ). New York: Norton, 1965.Google Scholar
  15. Garcia, E. E. (1987a). Freud’s seduction theory. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 42, 443–468.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Garcia, E. E. (1987b). Masson’s Assault on Truth: A critique. Jefferson University Journal of Psychiatry, 5 (1), 67–71.Google Scholar
  17. Greaves, G. B. (1980). Multiple personality: 165 years after Mary Reynolds. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 168, 577–596.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Halleck, S. L. (1990). Dissociative phenomena and the question of responsibility. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis. 38 (4), pp. 298–314.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harris, T. (1967). I’m OK you’re OK. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  20. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kihlstrom, J. F., & Cantor, N. (1984). Mental representations of the self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology Vol. 15 (pp. 1–47 ). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kluft, R. P. (Ed.). (1985a). Childhood antecedents of multiple personality disorder. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kluft, R. P. (1985b). The phenomenology and treatment of extremely complex multiple personality disorder. Dissociation, 1 (1), 39–46.Google Scholar
  24. Kluft, R. P. (1988). Editorial: Ubi sumus? Quo vademis? Dissociation, 1 (3), pp. 1–2.Google Scholar
  25. Laurence, J. R., & Perry, C. (1988). Hypnosis, will, and memory: A Psycho-Legal History. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  26. Ludwig, A. M., Brandsma, J. M., Wilbur, C. B., Bendfeldt, F., & Jameson, D. H. (1972). The objective study of a multiple personality: Or, are four heads better than one? Archives of General Psychiatry, 26, 298–310.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41 (9), 954–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Masson, J. M. (1984) The assault on truth: Freud’s suppression of the seduction theory. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar
  29. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  30. Orne, M. T. (1951). The mechanisms of hypnotic age regression: An experimental study. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46 (2), 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Orne, M. T. (1979). The use and misuse of hypnosis in court. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 27, 311–341.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Orne, M. T., Whitehouse, W. G., Dinges, D. F., & Orne, E. C. (1988). Reconstructing memory through hypnosis: Forensic and clinical implications. In H. M. Pettinati (Ed.), Hypnosis and memory (pp. 21–63 ). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  33. Perry, C., Laurence, J. R., D’Eon, J., & Tallant, B. (1988). Hypnotic age regression techniques in the elicitation of memories: Applied uses and abuses. In H. M. Pettinati (Eds), Hypnosis and memory (pp. 128–156 ). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  34. Prince, M. (1978). The dissociation of a personality. New York: Oxford University Press. ( Original work published 1905 )Google Scholar
  35. Putnam, F. W. (1989). Diagnosis and treatment of multiple personality disorder. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  36. Sheehan, P. (1988). Memory distortion in hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 36, 296–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Spanos, N. P., Weekes, J. R., & Bertrand, L. D. (1985). Multiple personality: A social psychological perspective. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 94, 362–376.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Spanos, N. P., Weekes, J. R., Menary, E., & Bertrand, L. D. (1986). Hypnotic interview and age regression procedures in elicitation of multiple personality symptoms: A simulation study. Psychiatry, 49, 298–311.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Spence, D. P. (1982). Narrative truth and historical truth: Meaning and interpretation in psychoanalysis. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  40. Sutcliffe, J. P., & Jones, J. (1962). Personal identity, multiple personality, and hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 10, 231–269.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Thigpen, C. H., & Cleckley, H. M. (1984). On the incidence of multiple personality disorder. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnopis, 32, 63–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Winnicott, D. W. (1965). The maturational process and the facilitating environment. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  43. Young, P. C. (1940). Hypnotic regression, fact or artifact? Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 36, 273–278.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin T. Orne
  • Nancy K. Bauer-Manley

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations