Advertisement

Assault on the Self: Positive Illusions and Adjustment to Threatening Events

  • Shelley E. Taylor
  • Margaret E. Kemeny
  • Geoffrey M. Reed
  • Lisa G. Aspinwall

Abstract

During a lifetime, the integrity and organization of the self may be threatened by a variety of assaults. These may be interpersonal, ranging from personal rejection to violence; they may involve the physical self, through trauma or debilitating, disfiguring, or life-threatening disease; or they may involve assaults to one’s sense of personal security, such as a robbery, an assault, or a natural disaster. The goal of our research program has been to identify the processes through which people adjust to these negative or threatening events. Previous research has focused largely on the adverse emotional and life-style consequences of such assaults. For example, Janoff-Bulman (1989; Janoff-Bulman & Frieze, 1983) has argued that people’s benign positive conceptions of themselves and the world, which she refers to as assumptive worlds, are often shattered in response to victimizing events. Assumptions about the world and the self must then be rebuilt on a shakier foundation, accommodating the new and negative perceptions that such events inspire.

Keywords

Human Immunodeficiency Virus Acquire Immune Deficiency Syndrome Psychological Control Aversive Event Threatening Event 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Affleck, G., Tennen, H., Pfeiffer, C., & Fifield, J. (1987). Appraisals of control and predictability in adapting to a chronic disease. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 273–279.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Averill, J. R. (1973). Personal control over aversive stimuli and its relationship to stress. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 286–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cassileth, B. R., Lusk, E. J., Strouse, T. B., Miller, D. S., Brown, L. L., Cross, F., & Tenaglia, A. N. (1984). Psychosocial status in chronic illness: A comparative analysis of six diagnostic groups. The New England Journal of Medicine, 311, 506–511.Google Scholar
  4. Collins, R. L., Taylor, S. E., & Skokan, L. A. (1990). A better world or a shattered vision? Changes in perspectives following victimization. Social Cognition, 8, 263–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Danoff, B., Kramer, S., Irwin, P., & Gottlieb, A. (1983). Assessment of the quality of life in long-term survivors after definitive radiotherapy. American Journal of Clinical Oncology, 6, 339–345.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Epstein, S., & Meier, P. (1989). Constructive thinking: A broad coping variable with specific components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 332–350.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1980). An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21, 219–239.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S., Dunkel-Schetter, C., DeLongis, A., & Gruen, R. J. (1986). Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 992–1003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Janoff-Bulman, R. (1989). Assumptive worlds and the stress of traumatic events: Applications of the schema construct. Social Cognition, 7, 113–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Janoff-Bulman, R., & Frieze, I. H. (1983). A theoretical perspective for understanding reactions to victimization. Journal of Social Issues, 39, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kemeny, M. E., Taylor, S. E., Weiner, H., Visscher, B., & Fahey, J. L. (1989). Psychosocial processes as cofactors in AIDS. Research in progress.Google Scholar
  12. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Michela, J. (1982). Perceived changes in marital relationships following myocardial infarction. Dissertation Abstracts Internation, 48, 4245-B.Google Scholar
  15. Molleman, E., Pruyn, J., & van Knippenberg, A. (1986). Social comparison processes among cancer patients. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 1–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Perloff, L. S. (1983). Perceptions of vulnerability to victimization. Journal of Social Issues, 39, 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Reed, G. M. (1989). Stress, coping, and psychological adaptation in a sample of gay and bisexual men with AIDS. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  18. Reed G. M., Taylor, S. E., & Kemeny, M. E. (1990). Perceived control and psychological adjustment in gay men with AIDS. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  19. Schulz, R., & Decker, S. (1985). Long-term adjustment to physical disability: The role of social support, perceived control, and self-blame. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1162–1172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Taylor, S. E. (1983). Adjustment to threatening events: A theory of cognitive adaptation. American Psychologist, 38, 1161–1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Taylor, S. E. (1989). Positive illusions: Creative self-deception and the healthy mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  22. Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psycho- logical perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Taylor, S. E., Helgeson, V. S., Reed, G. M., & Skokan, L. A. (in press). Self-generated feelings of control and adjustment to physical illness. Journal of Social Issues.Google Scholar
  24. Taylor, S. E., Lichtman, R. R., & Wood, J. V. (1984). Attributions, beliefs about control, and adjustment to breast cancer. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 489–502.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Taylor S. E., & Lobel, M. (1989). Social comparison activity under threat: Downward evaluation and upward contacts. Psychological Review, 4, 569–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Taylor, S. E., Wood, J. V., & Lichtman, R. R. (1983). It could be worse: Selective evaluation as a response to victimization. Journal of social Issues, 39, 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tempelaar, R., de Haes, J. C. J. M., de Ruiter, J. H., Bakker, D., van den Heuvel, W. J. A., & van Nieuwenhiujzen, M. G. (1989). The social experiences of cancer patients under treatment: A comparative study. Social Science and Medicine, 29, 635–642.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Thompson, S. C. (1981). Will it hurt less if I can control it? A complex answer to a simple question. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 89–101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Weinstein, N. D. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 806–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Weinstein, N. D. (1982). Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 5, 441–460.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Weinstein, N. D. (1984). Why it won’t happen to me: Perceptions of risk factors and susceptibility. Health Psychology, 3, 431–457.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Weinstein, N. D. (1987). Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems: Conclusions from a community-wide sample. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 10, 481–500.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wills, T. A. (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 245–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shelley E. Taylor
  • Margaret E. Kemeny
  • Geoffrey M. Reed
  • Lisa G. Aspinwall

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations