Advertisement

Williams’ Principle: An Explanation of Parental Care in Teleost Fishes

  • Robert Craig Sargent
  • Mart R. Gross

Abstract

Parental care may be defined as an association between parent and offspring after fertilisation that enhances offspring survivorship. This phenomenon has attracted the attention of evolutionary biologists since Darwin; however, it was not until the recent insurgence of behavioural ecology and sociobiology (e.g. Williams 1966a; Trivers 1972; Alexander 1974; Wilson 1975) that the variety of parental care patterns in animals has attracted such rigorous study. Perhaps because we ourselves are mammals, we tend to think of parental care as being the principal occupation of females, possibly with some help from males. A survey of the vertebrates, however, reveals that mammals are merely at one end of the spectrum, with predominantly female care, and fishes are at the other end, with predominantly male care (Table 11.1; see also Chapter 10 by Turner, this volume). Within teleost fishes with external fertilisation (about 85 per cent of all teleost families), one finds that the four states of parental care, ranked in descending order of their frequencies, are: no care, male care, biparental care, and female care. This seemingly peculiar trend has attracted considerable attention from evolutionary biologists, who have proposed several hypotheses about the origins of parental care in fishes (see reviews by Maynard Smith 1977; Blumer 1979; Perrone and Zaret 1979; Baylis 1981; Gross and Shine 1981; Gross and Sargent 1985).

Keywords

Parental Behaviour Parental Care Brood Size Territory Defence Future Reproduction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, R.D. (1974) ‘The Evolution of Social Behavior’, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 5, 325–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bagenal, T.B. and Braum, E. (1978) ‘Eggs and Early Life History’, in T.B. Bagenal (ed.), Fish Production in Fresh Waters, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 165–201Google Scholar
  3. Barlow, G.W. (1964) `Ethology of the Asian Teleost Badis badis. V. Dynamics of Fanning and Other Parental Activities, with Comments on the Behavior of the Larvae and Postlarvae’, Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 21, 99–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baylis, J.R. (1981) `The Evolution of Parental Care in Fishes, with Reference to Darwin’sGoogle Scholar
  5. Rule of Male Sexual Selection’, Environmental Biology of Fishes, 6,223–51Google Scholar
  6. Bell, G. (1984a) `Measuring the Cost of Reproduction. I. The Correlation Structure of theGoogle Scholar
  7. Life Table of a Plankton Rotifer’, Evolution, 38,300–13Google Scholar
  8. Bell, G. (1984b) `Measuring the Cost of Reproduction. II. The Correlation Structure of the Life Tables of Five Freshwater Invertebrates’, Evolution, 38, 314–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blumer, L.S. (1979) `Male Parental Care in the Bony Fishes’, Quarterly Review of Biology, 54, 149–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blumer, L.S. (1982) ‘A Bibliography and Categorization of Bony Fishes Exhibiting Parental Care’, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 76, 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Breder, C.M., Jr and Rosen D.E. (1966) Modes of Reproduction in Fishes, T.F.H. Publications, Neptune City, NJGoogle Scholar
  12. Colgan, P.W. and Gross, M.R. (1977) `Dynamics of Aggression in Male Pumpkinseed Sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus) over the Reproductive Phase’, Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 43, 139–51Google Scholar
  13. Downhower, J.F. and Brown, L. (1980) `Mate Preferences of Female Mottled Sculpins, Cottus bairdi’, Animal Behaviour, 28, 728–34Google Scholar
  14. Gross, M.R. (1980) `Sexual Selection and the Evolution of Reproductive Strategies in Sunfishes (Lepomis: Centrarchidae)’, PhD thesis, Unversity of Utah, pp. 1–319, University Microfilms International No. 8017132, Ann Arbor, MichiganGoogle Scholar
  15. Gross, M.R. and Sargent, R.C. (1985) `The Evolution of Male and Female Parental Care in Fishes’, American Zoologist,in pressGoogle Scholar
  16. Gross, M.R. and Shine R. (1981) `Parental Care and Mode of Fertilization in Ectothermic Vertebrates’, Evolution, 35, 775–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hirshfield, M.F. (1980) `An Experimental Analysis of Reproductive Effort and Cost in the Japanese Medaka, Oryzias latipes’, Ecology, 61, 282–92Google Scholar
  18. Hirshfield, M.F. and Tinkle, D.W. (1975) `Natural Selection and the Evolution of Reproductive Effort’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 72, 2227–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huntingford, F.A. (1977) `Inter-and Intraspecific Aggression in Male Sticklebacks’, Copeia, 1977, 158–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones, G.P. and Thompson, S.M. (1980) `Social Inhibition of Maturation in Females of the Temperate Wrasse Pseudolabrus celidotus and a Comparison with the Blennoid Tripterygion varium’, Marine Biology, 59, 247–56Google Scholar
  21. Keenleyside, M.H.A. (1979) Diversity and Adaptation in Fish Behaviour, Springer-Verlag, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Keenleyside, M.H.A. (1983) `Mate Desertion in Relation to Adult Sex Ratio in theGoogle Scholar
  23. Biparental Cichlid Fish Herotilapia multispinosa’, Animal Behaviour, 31,683–8 Kleiman, D.G. (1977) `Monogamy in Mammals’, Quarterly Review of Biology, 52,39–69Google Scholar
  24. Kleiman, D.G. and Malcolm, J.R. (1981) `The Evolution of Male Parental Investment inGoogle Scholar
  25. Mammals’, in D.J. Gubernick and P.H. Klopfer (eds), Parental Care in Mammals,Plenum, New York, pp. 347–87Google Scholar
  26. Kynard, B.E. (1978) `Breeding Behavior of a Lacustrine Population of Threespine Sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.)’, Behaviour, 67, 178–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lack, D. (1968) Ecological Adaptations for Breeding in Birds, Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Lynch, M. (1980) `The Evolution of Cladoceran Life Histories’, Quarterly Review of Biology, 55, 23–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maynard Smith, J. (1977) `Parental Investment: a Prospective Analysis’, Animal Behaviour, 25, 1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Perrone, M., Jr and Zaret, T.M. `Parental Care Patterns of Fishes’, American Naturalist, 85, 493–506Google Scholar
  31. Pianka, E. and Parker, W. (1975) `Age-specific Reproductive Tactics’, American Naturalist, 109, 453–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Porter, K.R. (1972) Herpetology, W.B. Saunders, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  33. Pressley, P.H. (1981) `Parental Effort and the Evolution of Nest-guarding Tactics in the Threespine Stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus L.’, Evolution, 35, 282–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Real, L.A. (1980) `On Uncertainty and the Law of Diminishing Returns in Evolution and Behavior’, in J.E.R. Staddon (ed.), Limits to Action: the Allocation of Individual Behavior, Academic Press, New York, pp. 37–64Google Scholar
  35. Reznick, D. (1983) `The Structure of Guppy Life Histories: the Tradeoff between Growth and Reproduction’, Ecology, 64, 862–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Salthe, S.N. and Meacham, J.S. (1974) `Reproductive and Courtship Patterns’, in B. Lofts (ed.), Physiology of the Amphibia, vol. 2, Academic Press, New York, pp. 309–521Google Scholar
  37. Sargent, R.C. (1981) `Sexual Selection and Reproductive Effort in the Threespine Stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus’, PhD thesis, State University of New York, Stony Brook, pp. 1–85, University Microfilms International No DA 8211237, Ann Arbor, MichiganGoogle Scholar
  38. Sargent, R.C. and Gebler, J.B. (1980) `Effects of Nest Site Concealment on Hatching Success, Reproductive Success, and Paternal Behavior of the Threespine Stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus’, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 71, 137–42Google Scholar
  39. Townshend, T.J. and Wootton, R.J. (1984) `Effects of Food Supply on the Reproduction of the Convict Cichlid, Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum’, Journal of Fish Biology, 23, 91–104Google Scholar
  40. Trivers, R.L. (1972) `Parental Investment and Sexual Selection’, in B. Campbell (ed.), Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, Aldine-Atherton, Chicago, pp. 136–79Google Scholar
  41. Unger, L.M. (1983) `Nest Defense by Deceit in the Fathead Minnow, Pimephales promelas’, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 13, 125–30Google Scholar
  42. Assem, J. (1967) `Territory in the Three-spined Stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus L. An Experimental Study in Intra-specific Competition’, Behaviour Supplements, 16, 1–167Google Scholar
  43. Iersel, J.J.A. (1953) `An Analysis of Parental Behaviour of the Male Three-spined Stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.)’, Behaviour Supplements, 3, 1–159Google Scholar
  44. Williams, G.C. (1966a) `Natural Selection, the Costs of Reproduction, and a Refinement of Lack’s Principle’, American Naturalist, 100, 687–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Williams, G.C. (1966b) Adaptation and Natural Selection, Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  46. Williams, G.C. (1975) Sex and Evolution, Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  47. Wilson, E.O. (1975) Sociobiology: the New Synthesis, Harvard University Press, Cambridge Wittenberger, J.F. (1981) Animal Social Behavior, Duxbury Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  48. Wootton, R.J. (1976) The Biology of the Sticklebacks, Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Tony J. Pitcher 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Craig Sargent
  • Mart R. Gross

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations