High Precision Irradiation Techniques for NTD Silicon at the University of Missouri Research Reactor

  • S. L. Gunn
  • J. M. Meese
  • D. M. Alger


The design factors which governed the construction of present NTD irradiation facilities at MURR were efficient utilization of reflector space, good doping accuracy, good doping uniformity, and potential for growth. The present MURR flux integration system will be described. This system consists of 1.5 mm diameter, self- powered neutron detectors and high precision analogue current integrators. These are utilized at each sample position to achieve an overall fluence accuracy of better than ± 1%. The integration system is used to determine the 50% of total fluence point at which samples are flipped end-for-end. This technique, as opposed to flux flattening or sample spiraling, provides a very efficient utilization of reflector space without compromising axial uniformity. Axial uniformity obtainable in any position is better than ± 4% of target over sample lengths of 250 mm. Sample rotators are used to obtain radial uniformity of better than ± \% up to 86 mm diameter. Present irradiation positions consist of two 750 mm long x 85 mm diameter, two 750 mm long x 60 mm diameter, seven 750 mm long x 80 mm diameter, and a high precision variable flux facility. The present MURR capacity is of the order of 15–20 ppb-tonnes per year.


Drive Shaft Flux Profile Current Integrator Axial Profile Initial Resistivity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1).
    H. M. Janus, IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices ED-23, 797 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2).
    J. M. Meese, this conference.Google Scholar
  3. 3).
    B. D. Stone, D. B. Hines, S. L. Gunn and D. McKown, this conference.Google Scholar
  4. 4).
    R. Berliner and S. Wood, this conference.Google Scholar
  5. 5).
    J. M. Meese, Silicon Detector Compensation by Nuclear Transmutation, Final Technical Report AFML-TR-77–178, Air Force Materials Laboratory, (1978).Google Scholar
  6. 6).
    Reuter Stokes, 18532 S. Miles Parkway, Cleveland, Ohio, 44128.Google Scholar
  7. 7).
    Brookhaven Instrument Corporation, Box 3136, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
  8. 8).
    D. E. Cullen and P. J. Hlavac, ENDF/B Cross Sections, Brook- haven National Laboratory, Upton, NY (1972).Google Scholar
  9. 9).
    A.S.T.M. Standard F84–73, 1916 Race Street, Phil., PA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. L. Gunn
    • 1
  • J. M. Meese
    • 1
    • 2
  • D. M. Alger
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.University of Missouri Research Reactor FacilityColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Dept. of PhysicsUniversity of Missouri-ColumbiaUSA
  3. 3.Dept. of Nuclear EngineeringU. of Missouri-ColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations