Advertisement

Contrast-Induced Acute Renal Failure

  • Vito M. Campese
  • Kunitoshe Iseki
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 212)

Abstract

Acute renal failure (ARF) can occur after radiologic procedures involving administration of contrast agents for angiography, intravenous urography (IVU), oral cholecystography, cholangiography and computerized tomography (CAT). However, the true incidence of this untoward effect is unknown.Large retrospective reviews, indicate that the incidence of contrast induced acute renal failure in the general population is low, being probably, greater for angiography (0.53%) than for IVU or CAT (0.15%) (1). In some series, the incidence of ARF after angiographic studies was as high as 13% (2–3). The greater incidence of renal complications following angiography may be the result of higher intrarenal concentration of contrast agent or of cholesterol embolization. These retrospective analysis, however, tend to underestimate the true incidence of this complication, since they include only the more serious cases requiring further medical attention but not the majority of cases with only mild and transitory rise in serum creatinine.

Keywords

Contrast Agent Acute Renal Failure Renal Blood Flow Intravenous Urography Cholesterol Embolization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Byrd, L., Sherman, R.L.: Radiocontrast-induced acute renal failure: A clinical and pathophysiologic review. Medicine 58: 270–279, 1979.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Older, R.A., Miller, J.P., Jackson, D.C., Johnsrude, I.S., Thompson, W.M.: Angiographically induced renal failure and its radiographic detection. Am. M. Roentgenol. 126: 1039–1045, 1976.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Swartz, R.D., Rubin, J.E., Leeming, B.W., Silva, P.: Renal failure following major angiography. Am. J. Med. 65: 31–37, 1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Van Zee, B.E., Hoy, W.E., Talley, T.E., Jaenike, J.R.: Renal injury associated with intravenous pyelography in nondiabetic and diabetic patients. Ann. Intern. Med. 89: 51–54, 1978.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Diaz-Buxo, J.A., Wagoner, R.D., Hattery, R.R., Palumbo, P.J.: Acute renal failure after excretory urography in diabetic patients. Ann. Intern. Med. 83: 155–158, 1975.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gelman, L.M., Rowe, J.W., Coggins, C.H.: Effects of an angiographic contrast agent on renal function. Cardiovasc. Med. 4: 313–320, 1979.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eisenberger, R.L., Bank, W.D., Hedglock, M.W.: Renal failure after major angiography. Am. J. Med. 68: 43–46, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    D’elia, J., Alday, M., Gleason, R., Malarick, C., Clouse, M., Kaldany, A., Weinrauch, L.: Acute renal failure following angiography. Prospective study of 150 patients, preliminary results. Proc. Clin. Dial. Transplant Forum 8: 123–124, 1978.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cramer, R.C., Parfrey, P.S., Hutchinson, T.A., Baran, D., Melanson, D.M., Ethier, R.E., Seely, J.F.: Renal function following infusion of radiologic contrast material. A prospective controlled study. Arch. Intern. Med. 145: 87–89, 1985.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kumar, S., Hull, J.D., Lathi, S., Cohen, A.J., Pletka, P.G.: Low incidence of renal failure after angiography. Arch. Int. Med. 141: 1268–1270, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shafi, T., Chou, S., Porush, J.G., Shapiro, W.B.: Infusion intravenous pyelography and renal function. Arch. Intern. Med. 138: 1218 1221, 1978.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Milman, N., Gottlieb, P.: Renal function after high-dose Urography in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. Clin. Nephrol. 7: 250254, 1977.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dudzinski, P.J., Petrone, A.F., Persoff, V., Callaghan, E.E.: Acute renal failure following high dose excretory urography in dehydrated patients. J. Urol. 106: 619–621, 1971.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Larson, T.S., Hudson, K., Mertz, J.I., Romero, J.C., Knox, F.G.: Renal vasoconstrictive response to contrast medium. The role of sodium balance and the renin-angiotension system. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 101: 385–391, 1983.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Barshay, M.D., Kaye, J.H., Goldman, R., Coburn, J.W.: Acute renal failure in diabetic patients after infusion pyelography. Clin. Nephrol. 1: 35–39, 1973.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harkonen, S., Kjellstrand, C.: Contrast nephropathy. Am. J. Nephrol. 1: 69–77, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Teruel, J.L., Marcen, R., Onaindia, J.M., Serrano, A., Quereda, C., Ortuno, J.: Renal function impairment caused by intravenous urography. A prospective study. Arch. Int. Med. 141: 1271–1274, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Weinrauch, L.A., Healy, R.W., Leland, U.S., Goldstein, H.H., Kassissieh, S.D., Libertino, J.A., Takacs, F.J., D’Elia, J.A.: Coronary angiography and acute renal failure in diabetic azotemic nephropathy. Ann. Intern. Med. 86: 56–59, 1977.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ansari, Z., Baldwin, D.S.: Acute renal failure due to radiocontrast agents. Nephron 17: 28–40, 1976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    De Fronzo, R.A., Humphrey, R.L., Wright, J.R., Cook, C.R.: Acute renal failure in multiple myeloma. Medicine 54: 209–223, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Myers, G.H., Witten, D.M.: Acute renal failure after excretory urography in multiple myeloma. Am. J. Roentgenol. 113: 583–588, 1971.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hunt, D.A., Molden, M.C., Humes, H.D.: The effect of radiocontrast agent diatrizoate, on the function of critical renal membranes. 18th Ann. Meet. Am. Soc. Nephrol., Dec. 15–18, 1985, 153A.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Talner, L.B., Rushman, H.N., Coel, M.N.: The effect of renal artery injection of contrast material on urinary enzyme excretion. Invest. Radiol. 7: 311–322, 1972.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hartmann, H.G., Braedel, H.E., Jutzler, G.A.: Detection of renal tubular lesions after abdominal aortography and selective renal arteriography by quantitative measurements of brush-border enzymes in the urine. Nephron 39: 95–101, 1985.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Norby, L.H., DiBona, G.F.: The renal vascular effects of meglumine diatrizoate. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 193: 932–940, 1975.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Humes, H.D., Hunt, D.A., Tekkanat, K., Holden, M.C.: Toxic effects of n-methylglucosamine on rabbit proximal tubule segments. Am. Soc. Clin. Invest., 1985.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Moreau, J.F., Droz, D., Noel, L.H., et al: Tubular nephrotoxicity of water-soluble iodinated contrast media. Invest. Radiol. 15 (Suppl) S54 - S60, 1980.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Katzberg, R.W., Schulman, G., Meggs, L.G., Caldicott, W.J.H., Damiand, M.M., Hollenberg, N.K.: Mechanism of the renal response to contrast medium in dogs: Decrease in renal function due to hypertonicity. Invest. Radiol. 18: 74–80, 1983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Golman, K., Almen, T.: Contrast media-induced nephrotoxicity. Survey and present state. Invest. Radiol. 20: S92 - S97, 1985.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Holtas, S., Golman, K., Tornquist, C.: Proteinuria following nephroangiography VIII. Comparison between diatrizoate and tohexol in rats. Acta. Radiol. (Suppl) 362: 53–56, 1980.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    White, M.D., Hunt, D.A., Humes, H.D.: Ability of the radiocontrast agent, diatrizoate, to precipitate renal tubules and membranes. 18th Ann. Metting of American Soc. Nephrol. Dec. 15–18, 1985, 163A.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schwartz, R.H., Berdon, W.E., Wagner, H.E., Becker, J., Baker, O.H.: Tatum-hors fall urinary mucoprotein precipitation by urographic contrast agents. Am. J. Roentgenol 108: 698–701, 1970.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Katzberg, R.W., Morris, T.W., Burgener, F.A.: Renal renin and hemodynamic responses to selective renal artery catheterization and angiography. Invest. Radiol. 12: 381–388, 1977.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Russell, S.B., Sherwood, T.: Monomer/dimer contrast media in the renal circulation: Experimental angiography. Br. J. Radiol. 47: 268271, 1974.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Morris, T.W., Katzberg, R.W., Fischer, H.W.: A comparison of the hemodynamic response to metrizamide and meglunine/sodium diatrizoate in canine renal angiography. Invest. Radiol. 13: 74–78, 1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bakris, G.L., Burnett, J.C., Jr.: A role for calcium in radiocontrastinduced reductions in renal hemodynamics Kidney Int. 27: 465–468, 1985.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dean, R.W., Andrew, J.H., Read, R.C.: The red cell factor in renal damage from angiographic media. J. Am. Med. Ass. 187: 27–31, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Katzberg, R.W., Pabico, R.C., Morris, T.W., Hayakawa, K., McKenna, B.A., Panner, B.J., Ventura, J.A., Fisher, H.W.: Effects of contrast media on renal function and subcellular morphology in the dog. Invest. Radiol. 21: 64–70, 1986.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kleinknecht, D., Deloux, J., Hornberg, J.L.: Acute renal failure after intravenous urography: Detection of antibodies against contrast media. Clin. Nephrol. 2: 116–119, 1974.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lasser, E.C.: Etiology of Anaphylactoid Responses: The promise of nonionics. Invest. Radiol. 20 (Suppl): 79–82, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Light, J.A., Perloff, L.J., Etheredge, E.E., Hill, G., Spees, E.K.: Adverse effects of meglumine diatrizoate on renal function in the early post-transplant period. Transplantation 20: 404–409, 1975.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Heidemann, M., Claes, G., Nilson, A.E.: The risk of renal allograft rejection following angiography. Transplantation 21: 289–293, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lang, J.H., Lasser, E.C., Kolb, W.P.: Activation of serum complement by contrast media. Invest. Radiol. 11: 303–308, 1976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kamdar, A., Weidmann, P., Makoff, D.L., Massry, S.G.: Acute renal failure following intravenous use of radiographic contrast dyes in patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes 26: 643–649, 1977.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Fang, L.S.T., Sirota, R.A., Ebert, T.H., Lichtenstein, N.S.: Low fractional excretion of sodium with contrast media induced acute renal failure. Arch. Intern. Med. 140: 531–533, 1980.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ramirez, G., O’Neill, W.M., Lambert, R., Bloomer, A.: Cholesterol Embolization, a complication of angiography. Arch. Intern. Med. 138: 1430–1432, 1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Smith, M.C., Ghose, M.K., Henry, A.R.: The clinical spectrum of renal cholesterol embolization. Am. J. Med. 71: 174–180, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Almen, T.: Development of nonionic contrast media. Invest. Radiology 20 (Suppl): 2–9, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Speck, V., Mutzel, W., Mannesmann, G., Pfeiffer, H., Siefert, H.M.: Pharmacology of noinoic dimers. Invest. Radiol. 15 (Suppl):317–322, 19 80.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vito M. Campese
    • 1
  • Kunitoshe Iseki
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Nephrology, Department of MedicineUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations