Advertisement

Scotopic Visibility Curve in Man Obtained by the VER

  • C. Huber
  • Emiko Adachi-Usami
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 24)

Abstract

The evidence attributing the retinal origin of the visual evoked response in man to the photopic system rests on two different kinds of experiments. One approach stresses the contribution of the cones: the cortical response grows up to 5° fovea) eccentiricity with the number of cones stimulated (van Lith and Henkes, 1970); the VER shows a Stiles-Crawford effect (de Voe, Ripps and Vaughan, 1968); the spectral sensitivity of the VER fits approximately the photopic luminosity curve (Armington, 1966; Cavonius, 1965; May and Siegfried, 1970). The localization of retinal areas able to elicit the VER have also been studied: using sinusoidally alternating half fields of 15° as a stimulus, Cooper and Robson (1970) were able to localize the centre of the visual field to within 15′ of the fixation point. The effect of check-size using flash or checker board reversal stimulation (Harter and White, 1970; Spekreijse, 1966) showing the influence of visual acuity on VER amplitude also points to the fovea for evoking the VER.

Keywords

Dark Adaptation Light Adaptation Test Light Cone Input Chlorided Silver 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. ADAMS, W.L., G.B. ARDEN and J. BEHRMAN. 1969. Brit. J. Ophthal., 53, 439.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ARMINGTON, J.C. 1966. In: Clinical Electroretinography, Suppl. to Vision Res., 6, 225.Google Scholar
  3. BARLOW, H.B. 1958. J. Physiol. ( London ), 141, 337.Google Scholar
  4. CAVONIUS, C.R. 1965. Psychon. Sci., 2, 185.Google Scholar
  5. COOPER, G.F. and B.G. ROBSON. 1970. J. Physiol. ( London ), 210, 90.Google Scholar
  6. DE VOE, B.G., H. RIPPS and H.G. VAUGHAN. 1968. Vision Res., 8, 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. EASON, R.C., D. ODEN, B.A. WHITE and C.T. WHITE. 1967. EER and Clinical Neurophysiol., 22, 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. GOURAS, P. and K. LINK. 1966. J. Physiol. ( London ), 184, 499.Google Scholar
  9. GRAHAM, C.H. and R. MARGARIA. 1935. Amer. J. Physiol., 113, 229.Google Scholar
  10. HARTER, M.R. and C.T. WHITE. 1970. EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 28, 48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. HOLMÉS, G. 1957. In: Polyak, The vertebrate visual system. (Ed. H. Klüsser). University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. van LITH, G.H.M. and H.E. HENKES. 1970. Ophthal. Res., 1, 40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. MAY, J.G. and B.B. SIEGFRIED. 1970. Vision Res., 10, 1399.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. PERRY, N.W. and R.M. COPENHAVER. 1966. In: Clinical Electroretinography. Suppl. to Vision Res., 6, 249.Google Scholar
  15. RUSHTON, W.A.H. and H.D. BAKER. 1963. Nature, 200, No. 4605, 421.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. RUSHTON, W.A.H. and G.H. HENRY. 1968. Vision Res., 8, 617.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. SHIPLEY, T. 1966. In: Clinical Electroretinography. Suppl to Vision Res., 6, 263.Google Scholar
  18. SPEKREIJSE, H. 1966. In: Analysis of EEG responses in man evoked by sine wave modulated light. Academisch Proefschrift, Univ. of Amsterdam, de Junk Publ.Google Scholar
  19. VAUGHAN, H.G. Jr. 1964. In: Clinical Electroretinography. Suppl. to Vision Res., 6, 203.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Huber
    • 1
  • Emiko Adachi-Usami
    • 1
  1. 1.Abteilung für experimentelle Ophthalmologie (II. Physiol. Abt.)W.G. Kerckoff-Instituts der Max-Planck-GesellschaftBad NauheimGermany

Personalised recommendations