Advertisement

Evoked Potentials to Changes in the Chromatic Contrast and Luminance Contrast of Checkerboard Stimulus Patterns

  • D. Regan
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 24)

Abstract

Many of the classical psychophysical studies of colour vision (and especially the experiments which established a foundation for the measurement of colour) were matching experiments (Maxwell, 1860; Abney, 1903; König, 1903). In these early studies the subject looked at a patch of light which was sharply divided down the middle (Wright, 1928, 1946; Guild, 1931). In some experiments his task was to adjust the brightnesses of the two halves of the stimulus until they appeared equal; in other experiments he adjusted the wavelengths of the two halves of the stimulus until he could just distinguish a difference between the hues of the left and right side of the stimulus. It has been well known to experimenters for at least 40 years that an over-enthusiastic subject could generate almost as many problems as a subject whose mind was not engaged with psychophysical considerations. McCree, working in W.D. Wright’s laboratory, carried out a study of this curious phenomenon (McCree, 1960). By voluntarily attempting to suppress eye movements by fixating as steadily as possible, many subjects were able to grossly degrade their power to distinguish between lights of different wavelengths. Both McCree and the present author turned out to be particularly susceptible to this effect of steady voluntary fixation. These two subjects were able to degrade very markedly their ability to distinguish between the hues of stimuli located as far apart as red and blue.

Keywords

Spectral Sensitivity Retinal Image Modulation Depth Colour Vision Checkerboard Pattern 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. ABNEY, W. de W. 1903. Researches in Colour Vision and the Trichromatic Theory. London: Longmans Green & Co.Google Scholar
  2. CAMPBELL, F.W. and L. MAFFEI. 1970. J. Physiol., 207, 635.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. DE VALOIS, R. 1971. Society for Neurosciences First Annual Meeting, Washington.Google Scholar
  4. GREEN, D.G. 1958. J. Physiol., 196, 415.Google Scholar
  5. GUILD, J. 1931. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., 230A, 149.Google Scholar
  6. HUBEL, D.H. and T.N. WIESEL. 1968. J. Physiol., 195, 215.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. KÖNIG, A. 1903. Gesammelte Abhandlungen Leipzig: J.A. Barth.Google Scholar
  8. MAXWELL, J.C. 1860. Phil. Trans., 57.Google Scholar
  9. McCREE, K.J. 1960. Optica Acta, 7, 281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. REGAN, D. 1964. Ph.D. Thesis, Imperial College, University of London.Google Scholar
  11. REGAN, D. 1966. EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 20, 238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. REGAN, D. 1970a. Vision Res., 10, 163.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. REGAN, D. 1970b. J. opt. Soc. Amer., 60, 856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. REGAN, D. and C.W. TYLER. 1971a. Vision Res., 11, 43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. REGAN, D. and C.W. TYLER. 1971b. Vision Res., 11, 1307.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. REGAN, D. and C.W. TYLER. 1971c. J. opt. Soc. Amer., 61, 1414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. REGAN, D. and H. SPERLING. 1971. Vision Res., 11, 173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. REGAN, D. and W. RICHARDS. 1971. Vision Res., 11, 679.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. REGAN, D. and W. RICHARDS. 1972. In Press.Google Scholar
  20. REGAN, D. 1972. Evoked Potentials in Psychology, Sensory Physiology and Clinical Medicine. Chapman and Hall and Wiley. 327 pp.Google Scholar
  21. REGAN, D. and H. SPEKREIJSE. 1972. In preparation.Google Scholar
  22. SPEKREIJSE, H. 1966. Analysis of EEG Responses in Man. Junk, The Hague, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  23. SPEKREIJSE, H. and L.J. van der TWEEL. 1965. Nature, 205, 13.Google Scholar
  24. SPEKREIJSE, H. and OOSTING. 1970. Linearizing, a method for analysing and synthesising nonlinear systems.Google Scholar
  25. STILES, W.S. 1964. Science. 145, 10016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. WALD, G. 1964. Science, N.Y., 145, 1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. WRIGHT, W.D. 1928. Trans. Op. Soc., 30, 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. WRIGHT, W.D. 1946. Researches on Normal and Defective Colour Vision. London, H. Kimpton.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Regan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of CommunicationUniversity of KeeleEngland

Personalised recommendations