Advertisement

Sex Differences in Social Interaction Between Infant Monkeys and Their Mothers

  • Gordon D. Jensen
  • Ruth A. Bobbitt
  • Betty N. Gordon

Abstract

Knowledge of the origin and development of sex differences in children is important in a dynamic formulation of social behavior. Although there is widespread belief that infant boys behave differently from girls, only scattered empirical evidence supports this view [1, 2]. The psychosocial theories of the origin of behavioral differences between the sexes emphasize cultural influences and psychological experience in terms of the parent’s, particularly the mother’s, attitudes and behaviors toward the child [3–5]. Animal behaviorists investigating sex differences have, on the other hand, emphasized unlearned or innate processes, particularly those effected and mediated by sex hormones [6, 7]. This gulf between developmental theories based on humans and on animal research appears to be large and resembles the old polarity between learned and innate determinants of behavior.

Keywords

Combine Group Male Infant Rich Environment Developmental Trend Privation Group 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Terman, L.M., and Tyler, L.E.: Psychological sex differences, in Carmichael, L. (editor): Manual of Child Psychology, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1954, p. 1064.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moss, H.A.: Laboratory and Field Studies of Mother-Infant Interaction (unpublished manuscript), Laboratory of Psychology, National Institute of Mental Health.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sears, R.R.: Development of gender role, in Beach, F.A. (editor): Sex and Behavior, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1965, p. 133.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Maier, H. W.: Three Theories of Child Development, Harper and Row, New York, 1965.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sears, R. R., Rau, L., and Alpert, R.: Identification and Child Rearing, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 1965.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Young, W.C., Goy, R.W., and Phoenix, C. H.: Hormones and sexual behavior, Science 143: 212, 1964.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Young, W. C.: The organization of sexual behavior by hormonal action during the prenatal and larval periods in vertebrates, in Beach, F.A. (editor): Sex and Behavior, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1965, p. 89.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harlow, H. F., Harlow, M. K., and Hansen, E. W.: The maternal affectional system of rhesus monkeys, in Rheingold, H. L. (editor): Maternal Care in Mammals, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1963, p. 254.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Harlow, H. F.: A behavioral approach to psychoanalytic theory, Science and Psychoanalysis 7: 93, 1964.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Seay, B., Alexander, B. K., and Harlow, H. F.: Maternal behavior of socially deprived rhesus monkeys, J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 69: 345, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harlow, H. F., and Harlow, M. K.: The effect of rearing conditions on behavior, Bull. Menninger Clinic 26: 213, 1962.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Harlow, H. F., Dodsworth, R. O., and Harlow, M. K.: Total social isolation in monkeys, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 54: 90, 1965.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jensen, G. D., Bobbitt, R. A., and Gordon, B. N.: Sex Differences in the Development of Independence of Mother-Infant Monkeys, in manuscript.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bobbitt, R. A., Jensen, G. D., and Kuehn, R.E.: Development and application of an observational method, J. Genet. Psychol. 105: 257, 1964.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jensen, G. D., Bobbitt, R.A., and Gordon, B.N.: The development of mutual independence in mother-infant pigtailed monkeys,Macaca nemestrina, in Altmann, S.A. (editor): Social Interaction Among Primates, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1966.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jensen, G. D., and Bobbitt, R. A.: An observational methodology and preliminary studies of mother-infant interaction in monkeys, in Foss, B. M. (editor): Determinants of Infant Behaviour III, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1963, p. 47.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bobbitt, R.A., Gordon, B.N., and Jensen, G.D.: Development and application of an observational method: Continuing reliability testing, J. Psychol. 163: 83, 1966.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bobbitt, R.A., Jensen, G. D., and Gordon, B. N.: Behavioral elements (taxonomy) for observing mother-infant-peer interaction in Macaca nemestrina, Primates 5: 71, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Edwards, A. L.: Experimental Design in Psychological Research, Rinehart and Co., Inc., New York, 1960.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grant, D.A.: Analysis-of-variance tests in the analysis and comparison of curves, Psychol. Bull. 53: 141, 1956.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jay, P.: Mother-infant relations in langurs, in Rheingold, H. L. (editor): Maternal Care in Mammals, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1963, p. 282.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    DeVore, I.: Male dominance and mating behavior in baboons, in Beach, F.A. (editor): Sex and Behavior, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1965, p. 266.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Harlow, H. F.: Sexual behavior in the rhesus monkey, in Beach, F.A. (editor): Sex and Behavior, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1965, p. 234.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Draper, W.A.: Free-ranging rhesus monkeys: Age and sex differences in individual activity patterns, Science 151: 476, 1966.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sears, R. R.: Survey of Objective Studies of Psychoanalytic Concepts, Social Science Research Council, Bull. 51, New York, 1943.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Spitz, R. A.: Autoerotism, Psychoanalytic Study of the Child 3 (4): 85, 1949.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Provence, S.A., and Lipton, R.: Infants in Institutions, International Universities Press, New York, 1962.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Koch, H. L.: An analysis of certain forms of so-called “nervous habits” in young children, J. Genet. Psychol. 46: 139, 1935.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Levy, D. M.: Fingersucking and accessory movements in early infancy, Am. J. Psychiat. 7: 881, 1928.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wattenberg, W. W., and Saunders, F.: Sex differences among juvenile offenders, Sociology and Social Research 39: 24, 1954.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press 1967

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gordon D. Jensen
  • Ruth A. Bobbitt
  • Betty N. Gordon

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations