Problem Solving

  • Shmuel Avital
  • Jose R. Pascual Ibarra
  • Ian Isaacs
  • Diana Burkhardt
  • Eric Love
  • Marion Walter
  • David Wheeler
  • Rolf Biehler
  • Tatsuro Miwa
  • Christopher Ormell
  • Vern Treilibs


An enormous number of studies about problem solving are being carried out at various centers of mathematics education. The reason for this fervent activity is quite clear to anybody involved in this area. It is generally agreed that to achieve the aims and goals of mathematic education the student must exercise and practice the direct application of learned algorithms, and then develop his ability to apply mathematics to the solution of problems encountered in the subject itself, in other sciences, and in everyday life. However, experience shows that the achievement of this two step goal is among the most enigmatic phenomena in education. Many students who show a reasonably good ability in the solution of exercises, that is, in the application of learned algorithms to straightforward tasks, fail completely when they are faced with a problem in which there is some gap between the problem and its solution; they fail when they have to organize the data to make a decision about what algorithm to apply. In general the ongoing research and activities are aimed at finding ways for the improvement of the student’s ability to solve problems.


Science Teacher Mathematic Teaching Small Rectangle Component Skill Educational Modelling 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. C.I.E.A.E.M. - “La problematique et l’enseignement de la Matheatique”. Comptes rendus de la XXVille rencontre. Louvain-la-neuve. 1976.Google Scholar
  2. Glaeser. - “Matematica para el profesor en formacion”. Eudeba, 1977.Google Scholar
  3. I.R.E.M. de Strasbourg. - “Le livre du probleme”. CEDIC, 1976.Google Scholar
  4. G. Polya. -. Polya. - “Mathematics and Plausible Reaoning”. Princeton University Press, 1954.Google Scholar
  5. G. Polya. -. Polya. - “How to solve it”. Princeton University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
  6. G. Polya. -. Polya. - “Mathematical Discovery”. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 1962 y 1964.Google Scholar
  7. P. Puig Adam. - “La matematica y su ensenanza actual”. Ed. Revista de Ensenanza Media. Madrid, 1960.Google Scholar
  8. Luis A. Santalo. - “La educacion matematica, hoy”. Ed. Teide. Madrid, 1975.Google Scholar
  9. 1.
    I. Schoenfeld, Alan H. “Can Heuristics be Taught?” (unpublished report), SESAME Project, Physics Department, University of California, Berkeley, 1976.Google Scholar
  10. 2.
    Teacher Practices Observation Record“, Mirrors for Behavior Ill: An Anthology of Observation Instruments, Anita Simon and E. Gil Boyer (eds.), Communication Mateirals Center, Wyncote, Penn. 1974, pp. 199–202.Google Scholar
  11. 3.
    Hollowell, Kathleen A. “A Flowchart Model of Cognitive Processes in Mathematical Problem Solving” (unpublished Ph.D. dissertation), Boston University, 1977, University Microfilms No. 7711363.Google Scholar
  12. 1.
    Hugh Burkhardt, “The Real World and Mathematics”, Shell Centre for Mathematical Education, Nottingham 1980 and Blackie and Son, Glasgow, 1981.Google Scholar
  13. 2.
    The U.S.M.E.S. Guide“. Unified Sciences and Mathematics in Elementary School, Moore Publishing Company, Durham, South Carolina, U.S.A., 1978.Google Scholar
  14. 3.
    Mathematics Across the Curriculum“, Open University In-Service Training Course PME 233, Open University, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
  15. 4.
    Vern Treilibs,. Hugh Burkhardt, and Brian Low, “Formulation Processes in MathematicalGoogle Scholar
  16. Billings, C., Problem solving in the primary school, M.T. 70 (1975).Google Scholar
  17. Bird, M., Using Noughts and Crosses as a starting point, M.T. 90 (1980).Google Scholar
  18. Clark, J., Elizabeth and the mystic rose, M.T. 73 (1975).Google Scholar
  19. Dichmont, J., Balancing - a conversation, M.T. 59 (1972).Google Scholar
  20. Hatch, G., Mathematics and ice-cream, M.T. 89 (1979).Google Scholar
  21. Hedger, K., The importance of being Kevin, M.T. 88 (1979).Google Scholar
  22. Hedger, K., Reflections on a question of method, M.T. 66 (1974).Google Scholar
  23. Hedger, K. and Kent, D., Given two points, M.T. 84 (I 978).Google Scholar
  24. Hedger, K. and Kent, D., Armes’ Theorem, M.T. 89 (1979).Google Scholar
  25. Jeffrey, R., Happy numbers, sad number, M.T. 85 (1978). Kent, D., The dynamics of put, M.T. 82 (1978).Google Scholar
  26. Kent, D., Isobel, M.T. 82 (1978).Google Scholar
  27. Middleton, G. et al, Out of School, M.T. 47 (1969). Renwick, E.M., Three articles, M.T. 74 (1976).Google Scholar
  28. Goffree, F., John - A teacher-training freshman studying mathematics and didactics, ESM Vol. 8 (1977).Google Scholar
  29. IOWO Team, Eleven minutes group work - a transcript, ESM Vol. 8 (1977).Google Scholar
  30. IOWO Team, Five plus four minutes class instruction - a transcript, ESM Vol, 9, (1978).Google Scholar
  31. Hedger, J. and Kent, D., Growing Tall, ESM Vol. 11 (1980).Google Scholar
  32. Armstrong, M., Closely Observed Children. Writers and Readers, London 1980.Google Scholar
  33. Banwell, C. et al, Starting Points. Oxford U.P., 1972.Google Scholar
  34. Bell, A.W., Rooke, D., and Wigley, A., JOurney into Maths. Blackie, 1977–9.Google Scholar
  35. Goutard, M., Mathematics and Children. Educational Explorer, 1964.Google Scholar
  36. Goutard, M., Mathematiques sur Measure. Classique Hachette, 1971.Google Scholar
  37. Renwick, E., Children Learning Mathematics. Stockwell, 1963.Google Scholar
  38. Fielker, D. “Notes from a Maths Centre” Mathematics Teaching #51 Summer 1970, pages 18–21.Google Scholar
  39. Gardner, Martin “Mathematical Games: The combinatorial richness of folding a piece of paper.” Scientific American May 1971.Google Scholar
  40. Hole, David “One Thing Leads to Another” Mathematics Teaching #72 Sept. 1975, pages 18–21.Google Scholar
  41. Steinhaus, H. Mathematical Snapshots. “Rectangles, Numbers and Tunes.Google Scholar
  42. Sturgess, David “An Afternoon with Five Cocktail Sticks” Mathematics Teaching #47 Summer 1969, pages 53–54.Google Scholar
  43. Walter, Marion Boxes Squares and Other Things National Council of Teachers of Mathematics 1970.Google Scholar
  44. Walter, Marion “Frame Geometry: An Example in Posing and Solving Problems” Arithmetic Teacher October 1980.Google Scholar
  45. Walter, Marion “Two Problems from a Triangle” Mathematics Teaching #74 March 1976, p. 38.Google Scholar
  46. Banwell, C.S., Saunders, K.D., and Tahta, D.G., Startin points. London: Oxford University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  47. Davis, P.J., and Anderson, J.A., “Nonanalytic aspects of mathematics and their implications for research and education”. SIAM Review 21, I (1979).Google Scholar
  48. Freudenthal, H., Mathematics as an educational task, Dordrecht: D. Reidel and Co., 1973.MATHGoogle Scholar
  49. Gattegno, C., “Functioning as a mathematician”. Mathematics Teaching 39 (1967).Google Scholar
  50. Gattegno, C., The commonsense of teaching mathematics. New York: Educational Solutions, Inc., 1974.Google Scholar
  51. Goutard, M., Mathematiques sur mesure. Paris: Classique Hachette, 1970.Google Scholar
  52. Hofmann, J.E., Leibniz in Paris. Cambridge: The University Press, 1974.MATHGoogle Scholar
  53. Servais, W., “Mathematisation et problematiqueGoogle Scholar
  54. Steiner, H-G’, “Examples of exercises in mathematisation at the secondary school level”. Educational Studies in Mathematics I, I - 2 (1968).Google Scholar
  55. Tahta, D.G., “About geometry”. For the Learning of Mathematics I, 1 (1980).Google Scholar
  56. Wheeler, D., “Mathematization”. Notes of the Canadian Mathematical Society October, 1974.Google Scholar
  57. Wheeler, D., “Humanising mathematical education”. Mathematics Teaching 71 (1975).Google Scholar
  58. Miwa, T., S. Shimada, & K. Kinoshita. Discords between mathematical instruction and science instruction. Proceedings of the Conference on Co-operation between Science Teachers and Mathematics Teachers. IDM, Bielefeld, 1979.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Boston, Inc. 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shmuel Avital
    • 1
  • Jose R. Pascual Ibarra
    • 2
  • Ian Isaacs
    • 3
  • Diana Burkhardt
    • 4
    • 5
  • Eric Love
    • 6
  • Marion Walter
    • 7
  • David Wheeler
    • 8
  • Rolf Biehler
    • 9
  • Tatsuro Miwa
    • 10
  • Christopher Ormell
    • 11
  • Vern Treilibs
    • 12
  1. 1.Israel Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael
  2. 2.MadridSpain
  3. 3.University of the West IndiesMona KingstonJamaica
  4. 4.University of BirminghamEngland
  5. 5.Shell Centre for Mathematical EducationUniversity of NottinghamEngland
  6. 6.University of NottinghamNottinghamEngland
  7. 7.Department of MathematicsUniversity of OregonEugeneUSA
  8. 8.Concordia UniversityMontrealCanada
  9. 9.Institute fur Didaktik der Mathematik BielefeldFederal Republic of Germany
  10. 10.Osaka Kyoiku UniversityOsakaJapan
  11. 11.Reading University ReadingEngland
  12. 12.Para Hills High SchoolWarradaleAustralia

Personalised recommendations