The Profession of Teaching

  • D. W. Alexander
  • Jeff Baxter
  • Iluminada C. CoronelSr.
  • Hilary Shuard
  • Zbigniew Semadini
  • Julian Weissglass
  • James E. Schulz
  • Thomas J. Cooney
  • Edward C. Jacobsen
  • Willy Vannhamme
  • Rosemary Fraser
  • Trevor J. Fletcher
  • Edith Biggs
  • M. E. Dunkley
  • Gerald R. Rising
  • A. G. Howson
  • Andrew C. Porter
  • David A. Sturgess
  • E. Glenadine Gibb
  • Martin Barner
  • Michel Darche
  • Richard Pallascio
  • Michael R. Silbert
  • Max Stephens
  • John C. Egsgard
  • Jacques Nimier
  • Leopoldo N. Varela


The 1975 report of the National Advisory Committee on Mathematical Education (NACOME) identified the lack of data regarding teacher education programs for mathematics teachers, particularly secondary teachers (NACOME, 1975: 144, 145). In response to this need for baseline data the Commisssion on the Education of Teachers of Mathematics (CETM) undertook a survey of preservice mathematics teacher education programs (elementary and secondary). Questionnaires were prepared, tested, and revised. In 1977 the 535 institutions accredited by the National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education for the preparation of teachers in the U.S. and 48 Canadian institutions involved in such preparations were sent questionnaires. Fifty-six percent of the forms were completed. An analysis of the responses on the basis of size of institution and geographic region satisfied the members of CETM that the survey was representative. The data collected is available through ERIC (Sherrill, James).


Mathematics Teacher Prospective Teacher Teacher Training Elementary Teacher Good Teacher 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Washington, D.C.: Conference board of the Mathematical Sciences, 1975.Google Scholar
  2. National Council of Teachers in Mathematics. An Inservice Handbook for Mathematics Education. Reston, Virginia, 1978.Google Scholar
  3. Sherrill, James M. NCTM Commission on the Education of Teachers of Mathematics Survey of Pre-Service;Secondary Mathematics Teacher Education Programmes. Reston, Va.: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1978. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 162 878 ).Google Scholar
  4. NCTM Commission on the Education of Teachers of Mathematics Survey of Pre-Service Secondary Mathematics Teacher Education Programmes in Canada. Reston, Va.: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1978. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 162 878 ).Google Scholar
  5. 1.
    Education in Asia and Oceania,“ Bulletin of the Unesco Regional Office for Education in Asia and Oceania, June, 1979.Google Scholar
  6. 2.
    Education in Asia and Oceania,“ Reviews, Reports and Notes, November, 1979.Google Scholar
  7. 3.
    Carson, L.C. The Story of Philippine Education, New Day Publishers, Philippines.Google Scholar
  8. 4.
    SEAMS members supplied information for this paper. These are Dr. Lee Peng Yee (Singapore), Dr. R. Turner-Smith (Hong Kong), Dr. Mokhtar Bidin (Malaysia), Dr. Milagros Ibe, Ms. Carmen de la Pena (Philippines).Google Scholar
  9. I. Shuard, H.D. and Quadling, D.A. (Eds.). Teachers of Mathematics: Some Aspects of Professional Life, Harper and Row, 1980.Google Scholar
  10. I. Fred Goffree, John–a teacher training freshman studying mathematics and didactics, Educational Studies in Math 8 (1977), 117–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 2.
    Arnold Kirsch, Beispiele fur “premathematische” Beweise, In: Beweisen im Mathematikunterricht, W. Dorfler, R. Fischer, editors, Holder-PichlerTernpsky, Wien 1979; 261–274.Google Scholar
  12. 3.
    Arthur M., Changes in primary school mathematics–are they complete, Mathematics teaching (1969) 20–24.Google Scholar
  13. 4.
    Arthur M., Goals for the mathematical education of elementary school teachers, Arithmetic Teachers 16 (1969) 59–62.Google Scholar
  14. 5.
    Zbigniew S., What should be the mathematical education of primary-school teachers (in Polish), Matematkya (Warsaw) 26 (1973), 299–309.Google Scholar
  15. 6.
    Zbigniew Semandeni, The concept of premathematics as a theoretical background of primary mathematics teaching, Institute of Math. Polish Acad. of Sciences, preprint, 1976.Google Scholar
  16. 7.
    Zbigniew Semandini, The mathematical training of elementary teachers, Proc. Conf. on Math. Education, Manila, 1978.Google Scholar
  17. 8.
    Tomas Varga, On primary school teachers, Mathe- matics, Educational Studies in Math. (Utrecht) Vol. 7 (1976) 171–177.Google Scholar
  18. 9.
    Julian Weissglass, Exploring elementary mathe-matics: A small-group laboratory approach, W.H. Freeman, 1979.Google Scholar
  19. 10.
    James E. Schultz, Joan R. Leitzel, Arthur L. White, Alternatives in the mathematics preparation of elementary teachers, The American Math Monthly (to appear).Google Scholar
  20. 1.
    Davidson, N., “Small Group Learning and Teaching in Mathematics: An Introduction for Non-Mathematicians” in Cooperation and Education (Sharon, Hare, Webb and Lazarowitz) Brigham Young University Press (1980).Google Scholar
  21. 2.
    Weissglass, J., Instructors Manual for Exploring Elementary Mathematics, San Francisco, W.H. Freeman and Co., 1980.Google Scholar
  22. 3.
    Weisglass, J., Mathematics for Elementary Teaching: A Small-Group Laboratory Approach, American Mathematical Monthly, Vol. 84, No. 5, May 1977, pp. 377–382.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Committee on the Undergraduate Program in Mathematics: Recommendations on Course Content for the Training, of Teachers of Mathematics. CUPM, Berkeley, California, 1971.Google Scholar
  24. Freudenthal, H.: Mathematics as an Educational Task. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland, 1973.Google Scholar
  25. J, Wallace: “Instructional Games with Calculators” Arithmetic Teacher. (Vol. 23, No. 7), November, 1976.Google Scholar
  26. K, Morris: Why Johnny Can’t Add. Random House, New York, 1973.Google Scholar
  27. National Advisory Committee on Mathematical Education: Overview and Analysis of School Mathematics Grades K-I2. Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences, Washington, D.C., 1975.Google Scholar
  28. National Council of Teacher of Mathematics: An Agenda for Action - Recommendations for School Mathematics of the 1980’s. NCTM, Reston, Virginia, 1980.Google Scholar
  29. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics: Problem Solving. 1980 Yearbook of the NCTM, Reston, Virginia, 1980.Google Scholar
  30. Schultz, James E.; Leitzel, Joan R.; White, Arthur L. “A Comparison of Alternatives and an Implementation of a Program in the Mathematics Preparation of Elementary School Teachers” (Final Report). Department of Mathematics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 1979.Google Scholar
  31. Brownell, W.A. Meaning and skill–- Maintaining the balance. Arithmetic Teacher, 1956, 15, 129–136.Google Scholar
  32. Magoon, A.J. Constructivist approaches in educational research. Review of Educational Research, 1977, 17, 651–693.Google Scholar
  33. Washington, D.C.: Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences, 1975.Google Scholar
  34. Otte, M. The education and professional life of mathematics teachers. Paper presented at the Third International Congress on Mathematics Education, Karlsruhe, Germany, August 1976.Google Scholar
  35. Popham, W.J. Performance tests of teachin gproficiency: Rationale, development, and validation. American Educational Research Journal, 1971, 8105–117.Google Scholar
  36. 1.
    Engel, A. (1976) The Role of Algorithms and Computers in Teaching Mathematics at School, Proceedings of the Third International Congress on Mathematical Education.Google Scholar
  37. 2.
    Beeby, T., Burkhardt, H. and Fraser, R. (1979) SCAN - a Systematic Classroom Analysis Notation for Mathematics Lessons. Shell Centre for Mathematical Education, Nottingham.Google Scholar
  38. 3.
    PLATO Project. Programmed Logic for Automatic Teaching Operation. Computer-based Education Research Laboratory, University of Illinois, Illinois 61801.Google Scholar
  39. 4.
    TICCIT Project. Time Shared Interactive Computer Controlled Information Television. Mitre Corporation, USA.Google Scholar
  40. 5.
    Papert, S. LOGO Project, Mass. Institute of Technology, USA.Google Scholar
  41. 6.
    ITMA Project. College of St. Mark and St. John, Plymouth, England.Google Scholar
  42. 7.
    Pollak, H. (1976) Panel Discussion: what may in the future Computers and Calculators mean in Mathematical Education. Proceedings on the Third International Congress on Mathematical Education.Google Scholar
  43. 8.
    James, E. B., Irland, D. (1980) Microcomputers as Protective Interfaced in Computing Networks. Imperial College, London University.Google Scholar
  44. 9.
    Fraser, R, Burkhardt, H. and Wells, C. How DRIVECHARTS Work. College of St. Mark and St. John, Plymouth, England.Google Scholar
  45. 10.
    Mathematics T. Ed. Steen, L.A. Springer Verlag. New York, 1978.Google Scholar
  46. Dunkley, M.E. et al., (1978), Report of the Enquiry into the Induction of Beginning Teachers in the ACT and the NT, Teacher Education Program, Macquarie University.Google Scholar
  47. Tisher, R.P., Fyfield, J.A., and Taylor, S.M., Beinnin to Teach Vol. I, ERDC Report No. 15 (1978) and Beginning to Teach Vol. II, ERDC Report No. 20, ( 1979 ), Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.Google Scholar
  48. Rubin, L.J., (1969), A Study on the Continuing Education of Teachers, Santa Barbara: University of California, Center for Co-ordinated Education.Google Scholar
  49. Fladen, R.E., Porter, A., Schmidt, W., Freeman, D., and Schwille, J. A policy-capturing study of teacher decisions about content. Paper presented at the meetings of the American Educational Research Association, Toronto, 1978.Google Scholar
  50. Freeman, D.J., Kuhs, T.M., Knappen, L., and Porter, A.C. A closer look at standardized tests. The Arithmetic Teacher (in press).Google Scholar
  51. Husen, T. International study of achievement in mathematics, vols. I and 2, Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell, and New York: John Wiley, 1967.Google Scholar
  52. Kuhs, T., Schmitd, W., Porter, A., Fladen, R., Freeman, D., and Schwille, J. Taxonomy for the classification of elementary chools mathematics content. (Res. Ser. No. 4 ). East Lansing, Michigan: Institute for Research on Teaching, Michigan State University, 1979.Google Scholar
  53. Porter, A.C., Schwille, J.R., Fladen, R.E., Freeman, D.J., Knappen, L.B., Kuhs, T.M., Schmidt, W.H. Teacher autonomy and the control of content Google Scholar
  54. taught (Res. Ser. No. 24) East Lansing, Michigan: Institute for Research on Teaching, Michigan State University, 1979.Google Scholar
  55. Porter, A.C., Kuhs, T.M., and Freeman, D.J. Is there a core curriculum in elementary school Google Scholar
  56. mathematics? Invited paper presented at the Textbook in American Education Conference cosponsored by the Center for the Book in the Library of Congress and the U.S. National Institute of Education, May 2–3, 1979. (The paper will be published in a book of the proceedings.)Google Scholar
  57. Slovic, P., and Lichtenstein, S. Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgement. In L. Rappaport and D.A. Summers (Eds.), Human judgement and social interaction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1973.Google Scholar
  58. 1.
    M. Erant - In-service education for innovation, occasional paper No. 4, National Council for Educational Technology (England) 1972.Google Scholar
  59. 2.
    P. Greer - Education’s stepchild - In-service Training occasional paper 28 - Council for Basic Education, Washington, D.C. (1979).Google Scholar
  60. 3.
    E. Hoyle - The role of the teacher - Routledge (1969).Google Scholar
  61. 4.
    D.A. Sturgess - An experiment in In-service training - Mathematics Teaching No. 65, December 1973.Google Scholar
  62. 5.
    D.A. Sturgess - A Framework for Mathematics Teaching in the Primary School - University of Nottingham, School of Educatin (1973).Google Scholar
  63. 6.
    D.A. Sturgess - Teachers cm do it - Mathematics in Schools Vol. 3, No. I, January 1974.Google Scholar
  64. 7.
    D.A. Sturgess - Humanizing inservice education in Mathematics - Mathematics Teaching, No. 91, June 1980.Google Scholar
  65. 8.
    C. Gattegno - The commonsense of teaching mathematics - Educational Solutions, Inc.Google Scholar
  66. 9.
    Making INSET work - Department of Education and Science - H.M. Stationary Office (England) (1978).Google Scholar
  67. 10.
    D.A. Sturgess - The problems of Teachers of Mathematics - Nottingham University, School of Education, (1980).Google Scholar
  68. Bishop, L.J., Staff Development and Instructional Improvement. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc., 1976.Google Scholar
  69. M, Karl. What we don’t know about inservice education: An agenda for action. Journal of Teacher Education, 1977 28, 41–43.Google Scholar
  70. National Council of Teachers in Mathematics. An In-Service Handbook for Mathematics Education. Edited by Alan Osborne. Reston, Virginia: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1977.Google Scholar
  71. R, Louis, Ed. Improving In-Service Education: Proposals and Procedures for Change. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc., 1971.Google Scholar
  72. Belanger, Maurice, Innovation dans la formation en cours de service des enseignants, OCDE, 1976.Google Scholar
  73. Daniel, John S., New Models for In-Service Teacher Training in Quebec: the PERMAMA and PERMAFRA programmes, OECD, 1976.Google Scholar
  74. Fi lion, Paul et Bédard, Roger, Mémoireâ la commission d’étude sur les universites, Tele-universite, juillet 1978.Google Scholar
  75. Gaulin, Claude, Innovations in Teacher Education Programmes, Conseil des Sciences du Canada, février 1978.Google Scholar
  76. Pallascio, Richard, Etude de l’evolution des interactions eléves-professeur due a l’implantation d’un nouveau modele de perfectionnement des professeurs de mathématiques, Universite de Montreal, these de doctorat inédite, 1978.Google Scholar
  77. 1.
    Didur, D., A report on Computer Science in Ontario Secondary Schools, Educational Computing Organization of Ontario (ECOO), June, 1980.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Boston, Inc. 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. W. Alexander
    • 1
  • Jeff Baxter
    • 2
  • Iluminada C. CoronelSr.
    • 3
  • Hilary Shuard
    • 4
  • Zbigniew Semadini
    • 5
  • Julian Weissglass
    • 6
  • James E. Schulz
    • 7
  • Thomas J. Cooney
    • 8
  • Edward C. Jacobsen
    • 9
  • Willy Vannhamme
    • 10
  • Rosemary Fraser
    • 11
  • Trevor J. Fletcher
    • 12
  • Edith Biggs
    • 13
  • M. E. Dunkley
    • 14
  • Gerald R. Rising
    • 15
  • A. G. Howson
    • 16
  • Andrew C. Porter
    • 17
  • David A. Sturgess
    • 18
  • E. Glenadine Gibb
    • 19
  • Martin Barner
    • 20
  • Michel Darche
    • 21
  • Richard Pallascio
    • 22
  • Michael R. Silbert
    • 23
  • Max Stephens
    • 24
  • John C. Egsgard
    • 25
  • Jacques Nimier
    • 26
  • Leopoldo N. Varela
    • 27
  1. 1.University of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Sturt College of Advanced EducationBedford ParkSouth Australia
  3. 3.Ateneo de Manila UniversityManilaPhilippines
  4. 4.Homerton CollegeCambridgeEngland
  5. 5.Institute of MathematicsWarsawPoland
  6. 6.University of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA
  7. 7.Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  8. 8.University of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  9. 9.UnescoParisFrance
  10. 10.Universite Catholique de LouvainLouvain-la-NeuveBelgium
  11. 11.College of St Mark and St JohnPlymouthEngland
  12. 12.DurhamEngland
  13. 13.LondonEngland
  14. 14.Macquarie UniversityNorth RydeAustralia
  15. 15.State University of New YorkBuffaloUSA
  16. 16.University of SouthamptonSouthamptonEngland
  17. 17.Michigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  18. 18.University of NottinghamNottinghamEngland
  19. 19.The University of TexasAustinUSA
  20. 20.Deutsches Institut fur FernstudienFreiburgGermany
  21. 21.IREM d’OrleansFrance
  22. 22.Teleuniversite du QuebecMontrealCanada
  23. 23.Hamilton Board of EducationHamiltonCanada
  24. 24.Education Department of AustraliaAustralia
  25. 25.Twin Lakes Secondary SchoolOrilliaCanada
  26. 26.IREM de ReimsReimsFrance
  27. 27.Buenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations