Proton Assignment Strategies in Nucleic Acid NMR Studies
Part of the
NATO ASI Series
book series (NSSA, volume 107)
The last few years have seen a rapid expansion in our ability to study nucleic acids and proteins of increasing size and spectral complexity by high-resolution NMR spectroscopy (see Kearns. 1984. and Wemmer & Reid. 1985. for recent reviews). An important factor in our ability to study biopolymers in the 8.000 – 16.000 mol. wt. range is the sensitivity and resolution of modern NMR spectrometers with magnetic field strengths in the 11–12 Tesia range (ca. 500 MHz). Even at such frequencies, the NMR spectra of 10.000 dalton biopolymers are very crowded, with many overlapping resonances, and the introduction of two-dimensional NMR spectroscopy (2DNMR) has been an equally important development. As in all forms of spectroscopy, the ability to specifically assign the majority of resonance peaks is the first crucial step in any detailed study and 2DNMR has facilitated the ease and speed of assigning relatively complicated spectra. In this paper I shall present the techniques and strategies for assigning nucleic acid NMR spectra, with particular emphasis on short DNA molecules containing 10–20 base pairs. In presenting these assignment methods I shall draw on examples taken from the work of several members of my laboratory to whom I am grateful, particularly Dennis Hare. David Wemmer and Shan-Ho Chou.
KeywordsCross Peak NOESY Spectrum Nuclear Overhauser Effect Cosy Spectrum Imino Proton
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Arnott. S. & Chandrasekaran. R. (1984) — private communication.Google Scholar
Chou S.H., Wemmer D.E., Hare D.R. &
Reid B.R. (1984) Biochemistry
. 23. 2257.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crippen G.M. (1981) Distance Geometry and Conformational Calculations. Research Studies Press/Wiley. Chichester.Google Scholar
Dickerson R.E. & Drew H.R. (1981) J. Mol. Biol.
, 149. 761.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hare D.R., Wemmer D.E., Chou S.H., Drobny G. & Reid B.R. (1983) J. Mol. Biol.
, 171. 319.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hare. D.R. & Reid. B.R. (1985) Biochemistry
, submitted.Google Scholar
Kearns D.R. (1984) CRC Crit. Rev. Biochem.
, 15. 237.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheek R.M., Russo N., Boelens R. & Kaptein R. (1983) J. Am. Chem. Soc.
105. 2914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheek R.M., Boelens R., Russo N., van Boom J.H. & Kaptein R. (1984) Biochemistry
, 23. 1371.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
States D.J., Haberkorn R.A. & Ruben D.J. (1982) J. Magn. Reson.
, 48. 286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner G. & Wuthrich K. (1982) J. Mol. Biol.
, 155. 347.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wemmer D.E., Chou S.H., Har D.R. & Reid B.R. (1984 a) Biochemistry
. 23. 2262.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wemmer D.E., Chou S.H. & Reid B.R. (1984 b) J. Mol. Biol.
, 180. 41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wemmer D.E. & Reid B.R. (1985) Ann. Rev. Phvs. Chem.
, 36. 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wemmer D.E., Chou S.H., Hare D.R. & Reid B.R. (1985) Nucl. Acids Res.
, 13. 3755.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
© Plenum Press, New York 1986