Advertisement

Measuring Devices and Dosage Units

  • John Calkins
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 7)

Abstract

The choice of a system of units is ultimately an arbitrary agreement for the facilitation of communication among different investigators. It is evident that units appropriate for the measurement of biologically injurious exposure to solar UV should be available and comprehensible to workers in the field. Any decision regarding units requires very careful consideration; systems of units must be practical and useful as well as scientifically correct to receive general acceptance and avoid frequent changes of unit. Units for specialties may arise from the larger framework of units, i.e., the SI system. In particular, it would be most desirable if photobiological exposures could be expressed in the SI system as joules/m2; however, this is impossible and a unit incorporating biological factors is required.

Keywords

Dosage Unit Solar Ultraviolet Radiation Wavelength Component Dosimetry System Biological Dosimetry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berger, D. S. 1976. The sunburning ultraviolet meter: design and performance. Photochem. Photobiol. 24: 587–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Billen, D. and A.E.S. Green. 1975. Comparison of germicidal activity of sunlight with the response of a sunburning meter. Photochem. Photobiol. 21: 449–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Caldwell, M. M. 1971. Solar UV irradiation and the growth and development of higher plants. In Photophysiology, Vol. 7, 131–177. A. C. Giese [ed]. Academic Press, N. Y.Google Scholar
  4. Calkins, J. 1975. Effects of real and simulated solar UV-B in a variety of microorganisms–possible implications of elevated UV irradiance, CLAP Monogr. 1, [Eds. D. S. Nachtway, M. M. Caldwell, and R. H. Biggs], DOT TST 75–55, U. S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, D. C., 5–33.Google Scholar
  5. Calkins, J., J. A. Barcelo, P. Grigsby and S. Martin. 1978. Studies of the role of solar ultraviolet radiation in “natural” water purification by aquatic ecosystems. Research Report 108, University of Kentucky Water Resources Institute, Lexington, Ky.Google Scholar
  6. Calkins, J. and Jeanne A. Barcelo. 1980. Some further considerations on the use of repair-defective organisms as biological dosimeters for broad-band ultraviolet radiation sources. Photochem. Photobiol. 3O: 733–737.Google Scholar
  7. Damkaer, D., D. B. Dey, G. A. Heron and E. F. Prentice. 1980. Effects of UV-B radiation on near-surface zooplankton of Puget Sound. Oecologia (Berl.) 44: 149–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Green, A. E. S. and R. A. Hedinger. 1978. Models relating ultraviolet light and non-melanoma skin cancer incidence. Photochem. Photobiol. 28: 283–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Green, A. E. S., K. R. Cross and L. A. Smith. 1980. Improved analytic characterization of ultraviolet skylight. Photochem. Photobiol. 31: 59–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harm, W. 1969. Biological determination of the germicidal activity of sunlight. Radiat. Res. 40: 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Luckiesh, M. and L. L. Holladay. 1931. Nomenclature and standards for biologically effective radiation. J. of the Opt. Soc. of Amer. 21: 420–427.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Machta, L., G. Cotton, W. Hass, and W. Komhyr. 1975. Measurement of solar ultraviolet radiation. 3rd Ann. Meeting, American Society for Photobiology.Google Scholar
  13. Robertson, D. F. 1969. Long term field measurements of erythemally effective natural ultraviolet radiation. In Biological Effects of Ultraviolet Radiation [F. Urbach, ed.], Pergamon Press, Oxford. 432–436.Google Scholar
  14. Scotto, S., T. R. Fears, and G. B. Gori. Measurement of ultraviolet radiation in the United States and comparison with skin cancer data. U. S. Department of Health Education and Welfare (NIH) 761029.Google Scholar
  15. Setiow, R. B. 1974. The wavelengths in sunlight effective in producing skin cancer: a theoretical analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 21: 3363–3366.ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. Tyrrell, R. M. 1978. Solar dosimetry with repair deficient bacterial spores: action spectra, photoproduct measurements and a comparison with other biological systems. Photochem. Photobiol. 22: 571–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Webb, R. B. 1977. Lethal and mutagenic effects of near-ultraviolet radiation. In Photochemical and Photo-biological Reviews, Vol. 2 [K. L. Smith, ed], Plenum Press, New York. 169–261.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Calkins
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Radiation MedicineUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA
  2. 2.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations