The phenomenon of induction is one of the most important concepts in embryonic development. Embryonic induction may be defined as the process by which one group of cells and/or cell products causes a second group of cells to differentiate into cells which differ from parent cells. For example, the roof of archenteron causes the overlying ectoderm to differentiate into neural tissue. Modification of genetic and structural characteristics occurs at each induction. Many successive inductions are involved in the development of embryonic structures. The embryo is a dynamic system in which the topographic relations of cells and cell groups are in constant flux. The spatial and temporal order of their relations are critical to the normal development and to the nature of inductive interactions at any given point and time. For example, the original archenteron roof does not remain in contact with the same ectoderm throughout gastrulation; the above structures progressively change their character. The reactive ability of the presumptive ectoderm of the gastrula diminishes with time, and this reactivity is influenced by exposure to previous inductive influences. An initially reacting tissue may even acquire inducing capacity. For example, the neural plate, once induced, is itself capable of inducing early gastrular ectoderm to form neural plate. The optic vesicles also perform an inductive role following their own induction. The phenomenon of successive induction emphasizes the multiplicity and diverse quality of embryonic inductive reactions. Many inducing systems operate during the course of development; one of these, referred to as Spemann’s organizer, is responsible for the formation of the nervous system.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Spemann, H. Experimentelle Beiträge Zu einen Theorie der Entwicklung, Verlag Von Julius, Springer, Berlin, 1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sazen, L., and Toivonen, S., Primary Embryonic Induction, Elek Books/Logos Press, London, 1962.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brachet, J., Chemical Embryology (trans. by L. G. Barth), 523 pp. Hafner Press, New York, 1968.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brachet, J., Introduction to Molecular Embryology, 170 pp., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tiedeman, H., Biochemical aspects of primary induction and determination, in: Biochemistry of Animal Development, Vol. 2 (R. Weber, ed.), pp. 4–55, Academic Press, New York, 1967.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Prasad, K. N., and Hsie, A. W., Morphological differentiation of mouse neuroblastoma cells induced in vitro by dibutyryl adenosine 3’:5’-cyclic monophosphate, Nature (London), New Biol. 233: 141–142, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Furmanski, P., Silverman, D. J., and Lubin M., Expression of differentiated functions in mouse neuroblastoma mediated by dibutyryl-cyclic adenosine monophosphate, Nature (London) 233: 413–415, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Prasad, K. N., Differentiation of neuroblastoma cells in Culture, Biol. Rev. 50: 129165, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wahn, H. L., Lightbody, L. E., Tchen, T. T., Induction of neural differentiation in culture of amphibian undetermined presumptive epidermis by cyclic AMP derivatives, Science 188: 366–369, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Prasad, K. N., Role of cyclic AMP in the differentiation of neuroblastoma cell culture, in: The Role of Cyclic Nucleotides in Carcinogenesis, Vol. 6 (J. Schultz and H. G. Gratzner, eds.), pp. 207–237, Academic Press, New York, 1973.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wahn, H., Lightbody, L. T., Tchen, T. T., and Taylor, J. D., Adenosine 3’,5’monophosphate, morphogenetic movements and embryonic neural differentiation in Pleurodeles waltili, J. Exp. Zool. 196: 125–130, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wahn, H. L., Taylor, J. D., and Tchen, T. T., Acceleration of amphibian embryonic melanophore development by melanophore-stimulating hormone, N6O2-dibutyryl adenosine 3’,5’-monophosphate and theophylline, Dev. Biol. 49: 470–478, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Weston, J. A. The migration and differentiation of neural crest cells, in: Advances in Morphogenesis, Vol. 8 (M. Abercrombie and J. Brachet, eds.); pp. 41–114, Academic Press, New York, 1970.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yamada, T., A chemical approach to the problem of the organizer, in: Advances in Morphogenesis, Vol. 1 (M. Abercrombie and J. Brachet, eds.), pp. 1–54, Academic Press, New York, 1961.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reporter, M., and Rosenquist, G. C., Adenosine 3’,5’-monophosphate: Regional differences in chick embryos at the head process stage, Science 178: 628–630, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Barth, L. G., and Barth, L. J., Differentiation of cells in the Rana pipiens gastrula in unconditioned medium, J. Embryo!. Exp. Morphol. 7: 210–222, 1959.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Barth, L. G., and Barth, L. J. The sodium dependence of embryonic induction, Dev. Biol. 20: 236–262, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Barth, L. G., and Barth, L. J., Sodium and calcium uptake during embryonic induction in Rana pipiens, Dev. Biol. 28: 18–34, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McMahon, D., Chemical messenger in development: A hypothesis, Science 185: 1012–1021, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Forn, J. and Valdecasas, F. G., Effect of lithium on brain adenyl cyclase activity, Biochem. Pharmacol. 20: 2773–2779, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Smith, B. M., Harris, C. A., and Major, P. W., The effect of lithium ions on the activation of ovarian adenyl cyclase, in: Advances in Cyclic Nucleotide Research, Vol. 1 (P. Greengard and G. A. Robison, eds.), p. 588(abstr.), Raven Press, New York, 1972.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shimizu, H., Creveling, C. R., and Daly, J. W., Effect of membrane depolarization and biogenic amines on formation of cyclic AMP in incubated brain slices, in: Role of Cyclic AMP in Cell Function, Vol. 3 (P. Greengard and E. Costa, eds.), pp. 135154, Raven Press, New York, 1972.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gilman, A. G., and Nirenberg, M., Regulation of adenosine 3’-5’-cyclic monophosphate metabolism in cultured neuroblastoma cells, Nature (London) 234: 356–357, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Blume, A. J., Dalton, C., and Sheppard, H., Adenosine-mediated elevation of cyclic 3’-5’-adenosine monophosphate concentrations in cultured mouse neuro-blastoma cells, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70: 3099–3102, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Prasad, K. N., Sinha, P. K., Sahu, S. K., and Brown, J. L., Binding of cyclic nucleotides with soluble proteins increases in “differentiated” neuroblastoma cells in culture, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 66: 131–138, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Prasad, K. N., and Kumar, S., Cyclic 3’,5’-AMP phosphodiesterase activity during cyclic AMP-induced differentiation of neuroblastoma cells in culture, Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 142: 406–209, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Prasad, K. N., Sahu, S. K., and Sinha, P. K., Cyclic nucleotides in the regulation of expression of differentiated functions in neuroblastoma cells, J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 57: 619–632, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ehrlich, Y. H., Brunngraber, E. G., Sinha, P. K., and Prasad, K. N., Specific alterations in phosphorylation of cytosol proteins from differentiating neuroblastoma cells grown in culture, Nature (London) 265: 238–240, 1977.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lazo, J. S., Prasad, K. N., and Ruddon, R. W., Synthesis and phosphorylation of chromatin-associated proteins in cAMP-induced “differentiated” neuroblastoma cells in culture, Exp. Cell Res. 100: 41–46, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Balhorn, R., Bordwell, J., Sellers, L., Granner, D., and Chalkley, R., Histone phosphorylation and DNA synthesis are linked in synchronous cultures of HTC cells, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 46: 1326–1333, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gurley, L. R., Walters, R. A., and Tobey, R. A., The metabolism of histone fractions. IV. Synthesis of histones during the G,-phase of the mammalian life cycle, Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 148: 633–641, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gurley, L. R., Walters, R. A., and Tobey, R. A., Cell cycle-specific changes in histone phosphorylation associated with cell proliferation and chromosome condensation, J. Cell Biol. 60: 356–364, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Krause, M. O., and Inasi, B. S., Histones from exponential and stationary L-cells. Evidence for metabolic heterogeneity of histone fractions retained after isolation of nuclei, Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 164: 179–184, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Burdman, J. A., The relationship between DNA synthesis and the synthesis of nuclear proteins in rat brain during development, j. Neurochem. 19:1459–1469, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Fujitani, H., and Holoubek, V., Nonhistone nuclear proteins of rat brain, J. Neurochem. 23: 1215–1224, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Olpe, H. R., Van Hahn, H. P., and Honegger, C. G., The non-histone protein pattern of rat brain during ontogenesis, Experientia 29: 665–666, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Elgin, S. C. R., Boyd, J. B., Hood, L. E., Wray, W., and Wu, F. C., A prologue to the study of the nonhistone chromosomal proteins, Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 38: 821–833, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Prasad, K. N., Waymire, J. C., and Weiner, N., A further study on the morphology and biochemistry of x-ray and dibutyryl cyclic AMP-induced differentiated neuroblastoma cells in culture, Exp. Cell Res. 74: 110–114, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kedar N. Prasad
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Colorado Medical CenterDenverUSA

Personalised recommendations