Advertisement

Nuclear Techniques for Directed Emission and Switched Operation of Grasers

  • G. V. H. Wilson
  • H. Hora
  • D. H. Chaplin
  • H. R. Foster
  • E. P. George

Abstract

The high frequency limitation of gamma ray lasers (grasers), the laser condition for feasible densities and the use of polarized nuclei in grasers is discussed. It is shown that, with polarized nuclei, directed emission and switched graser control are feasible. Experimental techniques and results for both resonant and non- resonant notations of the γ-radiation distributions from polarized radioactive nuclei are presented.

Keywords

Lower Laser Level Direct Emission Fractional Change Switch Operation Nuclear Orientation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    W. Vali and V. Vali., Proc. IEEE, 51, 182 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    G.C. Baldwin in Laser Interaction and Related Plasma Phenomena. H.J. Schwarz and H. Hora eds. (Plenum, New York 1974), Vol. 3B, p.875.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G.C. Baldwin and R.V. Khokhlov, Physics Today, 28, No. 2 p.32 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Hora, ZAMP, 16, 98 (1964)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. H. Hora, Z. Naturforsch, 20A, 543 (1965)ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. H. Hora, Phys Stat. Sol. 8, 197 (1965).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 5.
    H. Hora. Contributions to the 7th Conference on Lasers and Nonlinear Optics, Tashkent (1974); in Laser and Nuclear Energy. (Plenum, New York,1975); Sov. J. Quantum Electronics, 6 (1976), p.154.Google Scholar
  8. 6.
    A.L. Schalow and C.H. Townes, Phys Rev., 117, p.1940 (1958).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 7.
    H. Frauenfelder, The Mössbauer Effect. (Benjamin, New York, 1962).MATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 8.
    C.D. Jeffries, Dynamic Nuclear Orientation, (Wiley, New York, 1963); in Hyperfine Interactions and Nuclear Radiations. E.Matthias and D.A.Shirley eds. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1968).Google Scholar
  11. 9.
    A Abragam and M. Borghini, Progress in Low Temperature Physicst (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1964).Google Scholar
  12. 10.
    R.J. Blin-Stoyle and M. A. Grace in Handbuch der Physik. S. Flügge ed. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin) Vol. 42, 555 (1957).Google Scholar
  13. 11.
    A. Abragam, The Principles of Nuclear Magnetism. (Oxford University Press, London, 1961).Google Scholar
  14. 12.
    D.H. Chaplin, C.G. Don and G.V.H. Wilson, Phys Letters, 32A, 137 (1970).ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 13.
    E. Matthias and R.J. Holliday, Phys Rev. Letters, 17, 897 (1966).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 14.
    J.E. Templeton and D.A. Shirley, Phys Rev. Letters, 18, 240 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 15.
    G.V.H. Wilson, J.A. Barclay and C.G. Don, Phys Rev. B., 6., 729 (1972)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. G. V. H. Wilson and J. Bosse, Phys Rev. B, 10 1854 (1974).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 16.
    A.M. Portis and A.C. Gossard, J. Appl. Phys, 31, 2055 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 17.
    H.R. Foster, D.H. Chaplin, P. Lynam, D.E. Swan and G.V.H. Wilson, Hyperfine Interactions, to be published.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. V. H. Wilson
    • 1
    • 3
  • H. Hora
    • 2
    • 3
  • D. H. Chaplin
    • 1
    • 3
  • H. R. Foster
    • 1
    • 3
  • E. P. George
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Physics, Faculty of Military StudiesAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Theoretical PhysicsAustralia
  3. 3.School of PhysicsThe University of New South WalesKensington, SydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations