The Application of Mössbauer Spectroscopy to Studies of Supported Ruthenium Catalyst Systems

  • C. A. ClausenIII
  • M. L. Good


Heterogeneous catalysis is inherently a complex subject, and progress toward making it a science rather than an art has required knowledge and techniques in many fields. Consequently, as they have been more fully developed, physical tools such as electron microscopy and optical and magnetic resonance spectroscopy have seen increasing use in attempts to obtain detailed information on the surface structure of catalyst systems. A relatively recent addition to the collection of physical tools is the spectroscopic technique based upon the Mössbauer effect.


Mossbauer Spectroscopy Isomer Shift Selective Catalytic Reduction Silica Support Alumina Support 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    M. C. Hobson and J. Campbell, J. Catal., 8, 294 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. A. Flinn, S. L. Ruby and W. L. Kehl, Science, 143, 1434 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. Constabaris, R. H. Lindquist and W. Kündig, Appl. Phys. Lett., 7, 59 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Dunken, H. Hobert and W. Meisel, Z. Chem., 6, 276 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. C. Hobson and H. M. Gager, J. Catal., 16, 254 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. C. Hobson, Nature (London), 214, 79 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. M. Gager, J. F. Lefelhocz and M. C. Hobson, Chem. Phys. Lett., 23, 386 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    W. N. Delgass, M. Boudart and G. Parravano, J. Phys. Chem., 72, 3563 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. N. Delgass and M. Boudart, Catal. Rev., 2, 145 (1968).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    O. C. Kistner, Phys. Rev., 144, 1022 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    C. A. Clausen, R. A. Prados and M. L. Good, Chem. Commun., 1188 (1969).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. Kaindl, W. Potzel, F. Wagner, U. Zahn and R. L. Mössbauer, Z. Phys., 226, 103 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. A. Clausen, R. A. Prados and M. L. Good, J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 92, 7482 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    C. A. Clausen, R. A. Prados and M. L. Good, in “Mössbauer Effect Methodology” (I.J. Gruverman, Ed.), Vol. 6, p. 31. Plenum, New York, 1971.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    R. A. Prados, C. A. Clausen and M. L. Good, J. Coord. Chem., 2, 201 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. L. Good, “A Review of the Mössbauer Spectroscopy of Ruthenium-99 and Ruthenium-101”, Mössbauer Effect Data Index, (J.G. Stevens and V.E. Stevens, Eds.), pp. 51–69. Plenum, New York, 1972.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    C. A. Clausen and M. L. Good, J. Catal., 38, 92 (1975). [A report of the alumina and silica supported systems].Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    C. A. Clausen and M. L. Good, J. Catal., submitted, [A report of the zeolite supported materials].Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    C. A. Clausen and M. L. Good, J. Catal., submitted, [A report on the automotive catalysts].Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. Shelef and H. S. Gandhi, Platinum Metal Rev., 18, No. 1, pp 2 (1974).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. D. Allen, F. Bottomly, R. 0. Hains, V. P. R.insaln and C. V. Senoff, J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 89, 5595 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    H. P. Klug and L. E. Alexander, “X-ray Diffraction Procedures”, pp 504–509, Wiley, New York, (1954).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. A. Dalla-Betta, J. Catal., 34, 57 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    I. P. Suzdalev, M. Y. Gen, V. I. Goldanskii and E. F. Markarov, Sov. Phys., JETP, 24, 79 (1967).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    J. S. Van Wilringen, Phys. Lett. A, 26, 370 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    J. G. Stevens and V. E. Stevens, “Mössbauer Effect Data Index”, P. 266, Plenum Data Corp., New York (1973).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    W. N. Delgass, R. L. Garten and M. Chem., 73, 2970 (1969). Boudart, J. Phys.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    R. L. Garten, W. N. Delgass and M. 18, 90 (1970).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    H. S. Sherry, Advan. Chem. Soc., 101, 350 (1971).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    J. V. Smith, Advan. Chem. Soc., 101, 171 (1971).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    D. H. Olson, J. Phys. Chem., 74, 2758 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    K. R. Laing, R. L. Leubner and J. H. Lunsford, Inorg. Chem., 14, 1400 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    M. Shelef and H. S. Gandhi, Ind. Eng. Chem., Prod. Res. Dev., 11, 393 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    R. L. Klimisch and K. C. Taylor, Environmental Sci. Tech., 7, 127 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. A. ClausenIII
    • 1
  • M. L. Good
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryFlorida Technological UniversityOrlandoUSA
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryUniversity of New OrleansNew OrleansUSA

Personalised recommendations