Adsorption Chromatography of Small C-Terminal Peptide Amides on Dihydroxyalkyl Bonded Silica High Performance Liquid Chromatography Columns and Application to Purification of Insect Neuropeptides

  • T. K. Hayes
  • A. A. Strey
  • K. W. Beyenbach
Part of the Chromatographic Society Symposium Series book series (CSSS)


The chromatography of small neuropeptides (< 1400 mw) was studied on a high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) sized exclusion column designed with an aqueous-compatible dihydroxyalkyl bonded silica support. The major mechanism of retention for small peptide amides on this column was clearly not size exclusion but adsorption. Peptide amides were nearly always retained beyond the calculated salt volume of these columns. This retention was nearly five column volumes for selected peptides like substance P. Under the same conditions, peptide C-terminal acid analogs always eluted much closer to retention times predicted by their molecular weight. Changes in the composition of the mobile phase indicated that the selective retention of the peptide amides was primarily the result of selective yet weak hydrophobic interactions. However, most peptide amides will elute from these supports without the aid of organic solvents, an ideal characteristic for direct coupling of this method to reversed-phase HPLC. A pilot two-dimensional (dihydroxyalkyl HPLC/reversed-phase HPLC) HPLC purification of a diuretic peptide from mosquito head extracts showed that the coupling of these two forms of chromatography could be used to quickly isolate a minor component of a complex mixture.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    A. F. Bradbury and D. G. Smyth, Carboxyl-terminal amide formation in peptide hormones, in: “Biogentics of Neurohormonal Peptides”, R. Håkanson and J. Thorell, eds., Academic Press, London, pp 171–186 (1985).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. M. Holman, M. S. Wright and R. J. Nachman, Insect neuropeptides: coming of age, in: “ISI Atlas of Science: Animal and Plant Sciences”, 1:129–136 (1988).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. M. Stewart, Peptide Analogs, Trends Pharm. Sci., 3:300–303 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. C. Martins De Camargo, M. J. Vieira Da Fonseca and H. Caldo, Influence of the carboxyl terminus of LHRH and bradykinin on hydrolysis by brain endo oligopeptidedases, J. Biol Chem., 257:9265–9267 (1982).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. Hudson, D. Kain and D. Ng, High yielding fully automatic syntheses of cecropin A amide and analogues, Peptide Chem., 413–418 (1986).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. H. Petzel, H. H. Hagedorn and K. W. Beyenbach, Preliminary isolation of mosquito natriuretic factor, Amer. J. Physiol., 249.R379–R386 (1985).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. K. Hayes, T. L. Pannabecker, D. J. Hinckley, G. M. Holman, R. J. Nachman, D. H. Petzel and K. W. Beyenbach, Leucokinins, a new family of ion transport stimulators and inhibitors in insect malpighian tubules, Life Sci., 44:1259–1266 (1989).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. K. Hayes, L. L. Keeley and D. K. Knight, Insect hypertrehalosemic hormone: isolation and primary structure from Blaberus discoidalis cockroaches, Biophys. Biochem. Res. Comm., 140:674–678 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    L. R. Meyerson and K. I. Abraham, HPLC properties of peptides and proteins on dihydroxyalkyl bonded silica stationary phase, Peptides, 7:481–489 (1986).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. T. Mant and R. S. Hodges, Monitoring free silanols on reversed-phase supports with peptide standards, Chromatographia. 24:805–814 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. K. Bretthauer and A. M. Golichowski, Adsorption chromatography of phenylalanine peptides on Sephadex, Biochem. Biophys. Acta, 155:549–557 (1968).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. K. Hayes
    • 1
  • A. A. Strey
    • 1
  • K. W. Beyenbach
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratories for Invertebrate Neuroendocrine Research and Biotechnology Support Laboratory of the Texas, Agricultural Experiment Station, Department of EntomologyTexas A & M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  2. 2.Section of Physiology, VRT 826Cornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations