A Note on Overpressure Thin-Layer Chromatography of Ecdysteroids

  • H. Read
  • I. D. Wilson
  • R. Lafont
Part of the Chromatographic Society Symposium Series book series (CSSS)


It is now clear that the ecdysteroid family of compounds is very large and comprises at least 150 structurally related compounds. This diversity imposes severe problems for the use of chromatographic methods in the isolation and identification of ecdysteroids. We have, therefore, been interested in the evaluation of new chromatographic systems for these compounds, such as supercritical fluid chromatography ([1–3] and Morgan et al., this volume), and new developments which promise increased resolution for more traditional methodologies such as thin-layer chromatography (TLC). In the case of TLC two methods have recently been introduced, namely automated multiple development (AMD) and overpressure TLC (OPTLC or OPLC), which offer the prospect of enhanced resolution compared to normal TLC. In AMD the plate is repeatedly redeveloped in a solvent which is allowed to migrate a little further up the plate with each development. With each development a reconcentration of the components occurs resulting in high resolution and very sharp bands. Preliminary results for the use of AMD with ecdysteroids have been described elsewhere [4]. In the OPLC technique the plate is held under an inert, impermeable membrane under hydrostatic pressure (typically ca. 25 bar) and solvent forced through the layer using a high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) pump. As the flow of solvent through the layer can be controlled and is no longer dependent on capillary action, plates can be developed very rapidly. In addition solvent can effectively be run off the end of the plate allowing the use of mobile phases of relatively low eluotropic strength to obtain increased resolution.


High Pressure liqUid Chromatography Supercritical Fluid Chromatography Solvent Flow Rate Traditional Methodology Impermeable Membrane 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    E. D. Morgan, S. J. Murphy, D. E. Games and I. C. Mylchreest, Analysis of ecdysteroids by supercritical-fluid chromatography, J. Chromatog., 441:165–169 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. W. Raynor, J. P. Kithinji, I. K. Barker, K. D. Bartle and I. D. Wilson, Supercritical fluid chromatography of ecdysteroids, J. Chromatog., 436:497–502 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. W. Raynor, J. P. Kithinji, K. D. Bartle, D. E. Games, I. C. Mylchreest, R Lafont, E. D. Morgan and I. D. Wilson, Packed column supercritical fluid chromatography and linked supercritical-fluid chromatography-mass spectrometry for the analysis of phytoecdysteroids from Silène nutans and Silene otites, J. Chromatog., 465:292–298(1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    I. D. Wilson and S. Lewis, Separation of ecdysteroids by high-performance thin-layer chromatography using automated multiple development, J. Chromatog., 408:445 – 448(1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. Mincsovic and E. Tyihak, Analytical and preparative overpressured layer chromatography, in:“Recent Advances in Thin-Layer Chromatography”, F. A. A. Dallas, H. Read, R J. Ruane and I. D. Wilson, eds., Plenum, pp 57–66 (1988).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R Lafont, G. Somme-Martin and J. C. Chambet, Separation of ecdysteroids using high-pressure liquid chromatography on microparticulate supports, J. Chromatog., 170:185–194 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Read
    • 1
  • I. D. Wilson
    • 2
  • R. Lafont
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryBirkbeck CollegeLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryUniversity of KeeleKeele, StaffordshireUK
  3. 3.Department de Biologie CNRS-URA 686Ecole Normale SupérieureParis Cedex 05France

Personalised recommendations