Western European Population and Occupational RF Protection Guides

  • Kjell Hansson Mild


Very few Western European countries - if any - have a legislation regarding both occupational and population exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. However, most countries have some form of regu-lation of the occupational exposure for frequencies above about 10 MHz, either as limits, standards or as guidelines. There is also an accordance in the values and generally it can be said that most countries tend to follow the values given by ANSI C95-1982 with only minor divergences.


Stray Field Body Exposure Guideline Level Western EUROPEAN Population Radio Frequency Radiation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allen, S.G. and F. Harlen, 1983, Sources of Exposure to Radiofrequency and Microwave Radiations in the UK. NRPB-R144.Google Scholar
  2. Ansi, 1982, ANSI C95.1–1982, American national standard-safety levels with respect to human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields, 300 kHz to 100 GHz.Google Scholar
  3. Bernhardt, J.H., 1985, Evaluation of human exposure to low frequency fields. In AGARD lecture series no 138, The Impact of proposed radio-frequency radiation standards on military operations, available from NATO advisory group for aerospace research and development, 7 Rue Ancelle 92200 Neuilly Sur Seine, France.Google Scholar
  4. Grønhaug, K.L. and Busmundrud, 0., 1982, Antenna effect of the human body to EMP. Norweigian Defence Research Establishment, Kjeller, Norway. FFIF/453/153 (In Norwegian).Google Scholar
  5. Hankin, N.H., 1986, The Radiofrequency Radiation Environment: Environmental Exposure Levels and RF Radiation Emitting Sources. EPA 520/1–85–014.Google Scholar
  6. Hill, D.A., 1984, The effect of frequency and grounding on whole-body absorbtion of humans in E-polarized radiofrequency fields. Bioelectromagnetics, 5, pp. 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. INRS, 1978, Le rayonnement électromagnétique “radiofréquences” Applications et risques. ND 1127–92–78 (39–14) CDU 621.37: Cahiers de notes documentaires, No 92, 3e Trimestre 1978.Google Scholar
  8. INRS, 1982, Risques liés aux rayonnements électromagnétiques non ioni-sants. Cahiers de notes documentaires, No 107, 2e Trimestre 1982.Google Scholar
  9. INRS, 1983, Valeurs limites d’exposition aux agents physiques. Cahiers de notes documentaires, No 110, 1er Trimestre 1983.Google Scholar
  10. INRS, 1985, Protection contre les rayonnements électromagnétiques non ionisants. ND 1552–121–85 CDU 538.56. Cahiers de notes documentaires No 121, 4e Trimestre 1985.Google Scholar
  11. IRPA, 1984, Interim guidelines on limits of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields in the frequency range from 100 kHz to 300 GHz. Health Physics, 46, pp. 975–984.Google Scholar
  12. NRPB, 1982, Proposal for the health protection of workers and members of the public against the dangers of extra low frequency, radiofrequency and microwave radiations: A consultative document. ISBN 085951 185 5. Chilton, Didcot, Oxon, UK.Google Scholar
  13. NRPB, 1986, Advice on the protection of workers and members of the public from the possible hazards of electric and magnetic fields with frequencies below 300 GHz. A consultative document. ISBN 0 85951 267 3. Chilton, Didcot, Oxon, UK.Google Scholar
  14. Saxebøl, G., 1982, Administrative normer for radiofrekvent strâling for yrkeseksponerte? SIS Rapport 1982:2, State Institute of Radiation Hygiene.Google Scholar
  15. Rozzell, T.C., 1985, West German EMF exposure standard. BEMS Newsletter, no 55, dec 1984/jan 1985.Google Scholar
  16. VDE, 1986, Hazards by electromagnetic fields; Protection of persons in the frequency range from 0 Hz to 3000 GHz. DIN VDE 0848, teil 2.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kjell Hansson Mild
    • 1
  1. 1.National Institute of Occupational HealthUMEÅSweden

Personalised recommendations