Advertisement

Eastern European RF Protection Guides and Rationales

  • Stanislaw Szmigielski

Abstract

Electromagnetic fields (EMFs) are the relatively new, but rapidly intensifying ecologic factors. For millions of years the biological life on the Earth has been developing and undergoing evolution under influence of complex natural EMFs generated by the external sun radiation and natural electric fields in the atmosphere. The exposure was relatively weak, as the natural EMF intensities does not exceed the order of 10-8–10-9 W/m2. The situation has changed however dramatically some 50 years ago with introduction of various devices generating microwaves (MWs) and radiofrequencies (RFs) first for communication and navigation and later for multiple industrial and household purposes. The steady increasing occupational groups and whole populations of people living in certain areas (e.g., close to power lines and stations, TV/Radio broadcasting antennas, air force bases,etc.) are continously being exposed to EMF intensities that by few magnitude orders exceed the natural fields of the Earth. At present only the second-third generation of human beings is exposed to artificially generated EMFs and the long-term effects of these exposures are still difficult for forecasting. Despite numerous experimental investigations and epidemiologic studies, it is still not possible to prove the existence and character of any specific molecular, cellular or system-related damage that may be evoked by long-term exposure in low-level EMFs.

Keywords

Occupational Exposure Safety Level Occupational Safety Safety Criterion Exposure Zone 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adey, W.R.,1981, Ionic nonequilibrium phenomena in tissue interactions with electromagnetic fields,in: “Biological Effects of Non-ionizing Radiation, K.H.Illinger,ed.,ACS Symposium Series, 157: 271.Google Scholar
  2. Balcer-Kubiczek,E.K.,and Harrison,G.,1985, Evidence for microwave carcinogenesis in vitro, Carcinogenesis, 6: 859.Google Scholar
  3. Baranski,S., and Czerski,P.,1976, “Biological Effects of Microwaves”, Dowden,Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsburg,Pa.Google Scholar
  4. Buys,O.V., Kartun,K., Pieper,S., and Adey,W.R., 1986, Microwaves act at cell membranes alone or in synergy with cancer-promoting phorbol esters to enhance ornithine decarboxylase activity, Bioelectromagnetics, 7:Google Scholar
  5. Buys,O.V., Lundak,R.L., Fletcher,R.M., and Adey,W.R., 1984, Alterations in protein kinase activity following exposure of cultured human lymphocytes to modulated microwave fields, Bioelectromagnetics, 5: 341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Choy,R., Monro,J., and Smith,C., 1987, Electrical sensitivity in allergy patients, Clinical Ecology, 4: 93.Google Scholar
  7. Dawidow,B.I., Tichonczuk,W.S., and Antipow,W.W.,1984 “Biological Action, Safety and Protection Against Electromagnetic Radiations” (in Russian), Elektroatomizdat, Moscow.Google Scholar
  8. Elder,J.E., and Cahill,D.F.,eds.,1984, “Biological Effects of Radio–frequency Radiation”,EPA Report 600/8–83–026F,US Environmental Protection Agency,Research Triangle Park,N.C.Google Scholar
  9. Guy,A.W., Chou,C.K., Kunz,L.L., Crawley,J. and Krupp,J.,1985, “Effects of Low-level Radiofrequency Radiation Exposure on Rats,Vol.9, Summary”, Report No. USA FSAM-TR-85–64, USAF School of Aerospace Med., Brooks Air Force Base.Google Scholar
  10. INIRC-IPRA, 1984, International Non-ionizing Radiation Committee of the International Radiation Protection Association, Interim Guidelines on Exposure Limits to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields in the Frequency Range of 300 kHz to 300 GHz, Health Physics, 46: 4.Google Scholar
  11. Mc Dowall, M.E., 1983, Leukemia mortality in electrical workers in England and Wales, Lancet, 1: 246.Google Scholar
  12. Milham,S.,Jr., 1982, Mortality from leukemia in workers exposed to electrical and magnetic fields, New England J.Med., 307: 249.Google Scholar
  13. Minin,B.A., 1974, “Ultra-high Frequencies and Human Safety”(in Russian),Elektroatomizdat,Moscow.Romero-Sierra,C., 1984,Bioeffects of electromagnetic waves, in “Review of Radio Science 1981–1983”, Bowhill,S.A.,ed.,Intern.Union of Radio Sciences (URSI), Brussel,Belgium,p.K-1.Google Scholar
  14. Sawin,B.M.,Nikonowa,K.W., Lobanowa,E.A., Sadczikowa,M.N., and Lobed,E.K.,1983, Nowoje w normirowanij elektromagnitnych izluczenii mikrowolnowo diapazona (in Russian, Novelties in safety standards of EM radiations of the microwave range), Gigiena Truda, 3: 1.Google Scholar
  15. Szmigielski,S., Bielec,M., Lipski,S.,and Sokolska,G., 1987, Immunologic and cancer-related aspects of exposure to low-level micro-wave and radiofrequency fields, in: “Fundamentals of Modern Bioelectricity”, Marino,A.A.,ed., M.Dekker Co., N.York.Google Scholar
  16. Szmigielski,S., Szudzinski,A., Pietraszek,A., Bielec,M., Janiak,M., and Wrembel,J.K., 1982, Accelerated development of spontaneous and benzopyrene-induced skin cancer in mice exposed to 2450 MHz microwave radiation, Bioelectromagnetics, 3: 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stanislaw Szmigielski
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological Effects of Non-ionizing RadiationsCenter for Radiobiology and Radiation SafetyWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations