Advertisement

Marine Fishery Research

  • J. L. McHugh
Part of the Lecture Notes on Coastal and Estuarine Studies book series (COASTAL, volume 10)

Abstract

Marine fishery research had its origin in man’s reactions to a universal natural phenomenon, fluctuations in abundance. From the earliest days of fishing it has been known that catches of particular species are variable. We now know that these fluctuations were caused by annual changes in the success of spawning, or by changes in environmental conditions which altered patterns of migration or geographic distribution, or by both. The natural inclination then, as today, was to blame decreased catches upon one or more activities of man. When fishing was responsible for the decline, the nature of the effect was misunderstood, as it often is today. In a fully developed, but still healthy fishery, the catch-per-unit-of-effort is much less than it was when the virgin stock was first fished, the average size and age of the fish are considerably less, and the stock and its biology may be altered in various other ways. Fishery research began because people wanted to know the reasons for these changes, and if possible how to correct the situation.

Keywords

Fishery Science Fishing Effort Sockeye Salmon Fishing Mortality Yellowfin Tuna 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Appelof, A. 1909. Untersuchungen über den Hummer. Bergens Mus. Skr. NyRaekke 1 (1): 1–79.Google Scholar
  2. Atkins, Charles G. 1876. Atlantic salmon. Rept. U. S. Comm. Fish. for 1873–74 and 1874–75: xxx-xxxii.Google Scholar
  3. Baranov, Th. I. 1918. On the question of the biological basis of fisheries. Inst. for Sci. Ichthyol. Invest., Proc. 1(1):81–128. Reports from the Division of Fish Management and Scientific Study of the Fishery Industry 1(1), Moscow.Google Scholar
  4. Berry, Richard James. 1967. Dynamics of the Tortugas (Florida) pink shrimp population. A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Oceanography, Univ. Rhode Island: xviii + 160 p.Google Scholar
  5. DeLury, Daniel B. 1947. On the estimation of biological populations. Biometrics 3 (4): 145–167.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Foerster, R. E. 1936. The return from the sea of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) with special reference to percentage survival, sex proportions and progress of migration. J. Biol. Bd. Canada 3: 26–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Foerster, R. E. and W. E. Ricker. 1942. The effect of reduction of predaceous fish on survival of young sockeye salmon at Cultus Lake. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 5 (4): 315–336.Google Scholar
  8. Galtsoff, Paul S. 1962. The story of the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts. U.S. Dept. Interior, Fish and Wildl. Serv., Bu. Comm. Fish., Circ. 415: iii + 121 p.Google Scholar
  9. Graham, Michael. 1929. Studies of age determination in fish. Pt. II. A survey of the literature. Min. Agric. Fish., Fish. Inv. Ser. II, xi(3): 50 p.Google Scholar
  10. Groves, Alan B. and Anthony J. Novotny. 1965. A thermal marking technique for juvenile salmonids. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 94 (4): 386–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haskin, H. H., L. A. Stauber and J. G. Mackin. 1966. Minchinia nelsoni n. sp. (Haplosporida: Haplosporidiidae): Causative agent of the Delaware Bay oyster epizootic. Science 153(3742): 1414–1416.Google Scholar
  12. Hennemuth, Richard C. 1977. Some biological aspects of optimum yield. In: Marine Recreational Fisheries 2. Proc. 2nd Ann. Marine Recr. Fish. Symp., Sport Fishing Inst., Washington, D. C.: 17–27.Google Scholar
  13. Hewatt, Willis G. and Jay D. Andrews. 1954. Oyster mortality studies in Virginia. I. Mortalities of oysters in trays at Gloucester Point, York River. Texas J. Sci. 1954 (2): 121–133.Google Scholar
  14. Hjort, Johan. 1914. Fluctuations in the great fisheries of northern Europe viewed in the light of biological research. Cons. Perm. Internatl. Explor. Mer, Rapp. Proc.-Verb. 20: 228 p.Google Scholar
  15. Hjort, Johan. 1926. Fluctuations in the year classes of important food fishes. J. Cons. 1 (1): 5–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoffbauer, C. 1898. Die Altersbestimmung des Karpfen an seiner Schuppe. Allg. Fisch. Zeit., Jg. 23: 341–343.Google Scholar
  17. Lea, Einar. 1911. A study in the growth of herrings. Cons. Perm. Internatl. Explor. Mer, Pub. Circ. 61: 35–57.Google Scholar
  18. Lea, Einar. 1929. Investigations on the races of food fishes. III. The herring’s scale as a certificate of origin; its applicability to race investigations. Cons. Perm. Internatl. Explor. Mer, Rapp. Proc.-Verb. 54 (3): 21.Google Scholar
  19. Lee, Rosa M. 1912. An investigation into the methods of growth determination in fishes. Cons. Perm. Internatl. Explor. Mer, Pub. Circ. 63: 35 p.Google Scholar
  20. Logie, R. R. 1956. Oyster mortalities, old and new, in the Maritimes. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada, Prog. Rept. Atl. Coast Stas. 65: 3–11.Google Scholar
  21. Loosanoff, V. L. 1961. Recent advances in the control of shellfish predators and competitors. Gulf and Caribb. Fish. Inst., Proc. 13th Ann. Sess: 113–127.Google Scholar
  22. Mackin, J. G. 1961. Status of researches on oyster diseases in North America. Gulf and Caribb. Fish. Inst., Proc. 13th Ann. Sess: 98–109.Google Scholar
  23. Major, Richard L. and Donovan R. Craddock. 1962. Marking sockeye salmon scales by short periods of starvation. U.S. Dept. Interior, Fish and Wildl. Serv., Spec. Sci. Rept. - Fish. 416: iii + 12 p.Google Scholar
  24. Margolis, Leo. 1963. Parasites as indicators of the geographical origin of sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka (Walbaum), occurring in the North Pacific Ocean and adjacent seas. Internatl. North Pacific Fisheries Comm., Bull. 11: 101–156.Google Scholar
  25. McHugh, J. L. 1951. Meristic variations and populations of northern anchovy (Engraulis mordax mordax). Bull. Scripps Inst. Ocean 6 (3): 123–160.Google Scholar
  26. Mighell, James L. 1969. Rapid cold branding of salmon and trout with liquid nitrogen. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 26 (10): 2765–2769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nesbit, Robert A. 1933. A new method of marking fish by means of internal tags. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 63: 306–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Otto, Sara V. 1975. D. N. R. readies new facility for shellfish studies. Md. D.pt. Natural Resources, Commercial Fisheries News 8 (6): 1.Google Scholar
  29. Palmen, Arthur T. 1956. A comparison of otoliths and interopercular bones as age indicators of English sole. Wash. State Dept. Fish., Fish. Res. Papers 1 (4): 5–20.Google Scholar
  30. Paloheimo, J. E. and L. M. Dickie. 1965. Food and growth of fishes. I. A growth curve derived from experimental data. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 22 (2): 521–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Paloheimo, J. E. and L. M. Dickie. 1966a. Food and growth of fishes. II. Effects of food and temperature on the relation between body size and metabolism. J. Res. Bd. Canada 23 (6): 869–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Paloheimo, J. E. and L. M. Dickie. 1966b. Food and growth of fishes. III. Relations among food, body size and growth efficiency. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 23 (8): 1209–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Parrish, B. B. 1956. The cod, haddock, and hake. In: Sea Fisheries. Michael Graham (ed). Edward Arnold Ltd., London: 251–331.Google Scholar
  34. Pella, Jerome J. and Patrick K. Tomlinson. 1969. A generalized stock production model. Bull. Inter-Am. Trop. Tuna Comm. 13 (3): 421–496.Google Scholar
  35. Petersen, C. G. J. 1894. On the biology of our flatfishes and on the decrease of our flat-fish fisheries, App. IV. On the labelling of living plaice. Rept. Danish Biol. Sta. 4: 140–143.Google Scholar
  36. Ricker, W. E. 1940. Relation of “catch per unit of effort” to abundance and rate of exploitation. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 5 (1): 43–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ricker, W. E. 1969. Effects of size-selective mortality and sampling bias on estimates of growth, mortality, production, and yield. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 26 (3): 479–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ricker, W. E. 1975. Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada, Bull. 191: xviii + 382 p.Google Scholar
  39. Ricker, W. E. and John Gottschalk. 1941. An experiment in removing coarse fish from a lake. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 70: 283–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rounsefell, George A. 1930. Contribution to the biology of the Pacific herring, Ciupea paliasii, and the condition of the fishery in Alaska. Bull. U.S. Bu. Fish. 45: 227–320.Google Scholar
  41. Rounsefell, George A. 1963. Marking fish and invertebrates. U.S. Dept. Interior, Fish and Wildl. Serv., Bu. Comm. Fish., Leaflet 549: x + 12 p.Google Scholar
  42. Rounsefell, George A. and Edwin H. Dahlgren. 1933. Tagging experiments on the Pacific herring, Clupea pallasii. J. Cons. 8 (3): 371–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rounsefell, George A. and John L. Kask. 1945. How to mark fish. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 73: 320–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Royce, William F. 1964. A morphometric study of yellowfin tuna Thunnus albacares (Bonnaterre). Bull. U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv. 63 (2): 395–443.Google Scholar
  45. Rucker, R. R., B. J. Earp and E. J. Ordal. 1954. Infectious diseases of Pacific salmon. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 83: 297–312.Google Scholar
  46. Schaefer, Milner B. 1943. The theoretical relationship between fishing effort and mortality. Copeia 1943 (2): 79–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schaefer, Milner B. 1957. A study of the dynamics of the fishery for yellowfin tuna in the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean. Bull. Inter-Am. Trop. Tuna Comm. 2 (6): 245–285.Google Scholar
  48. Schaefer, Milner B. 1968. Methods of estimating effects of fishing on fish populations. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 97 (3): 231–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Silliman, Ralph P. 1943. Studies on the Pacific pilchard or sardine (Sardinops caerulea). 5. A method of computing mortalities and replacements. U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv., Spec. Sci. Rept. 24: 10 p.Google Scholar
  50. Silliman, Ralph P. and James S. Gutsell. 1958. Experimental exploitation of fish populations. U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv., Bu. Comm. Fish., Bull. 58: 215–252.Google Scholar
  51. Sindermann, Carl J. 1968. Oyster mortalities, with particular reference to Chesapeake Bay and the Atlantic coast of North America. U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv., Spec. Sci. Rept.-Fish. 569: 1–10.Google Scholar
  52. Sindermann, Carl J. 1970. Principal diseases of marine fish and shellfish. Academic Press, New York: 369 p.Google Scholar
  53. Smiley, Charles W. 1883. Four tables showing the amount of public money appropriated for carrying on the United States Commission of Fish and Fisheries and the various State Commissions from 1865 to 1882, inclusive. Bull. U.S. Fish Comm., Vol. III for 1883: 149–152.Google Scholar
  54. Snieszko, Stanislas F. (ed). 1970. Symposium on diseases of fishes and shellfishes. Am. Fish. Soc., Wash., D.C. Spec. Pub. 5: viii + 526 p.Google Scholar
  55. Snieszko, Stanislas F., R. F. Nigrelli and K. E. Wolf (eds). 1965. Viral diseases of poikilothermic vertebrates. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 126: 680 p.Google Scholar
  56. Thompson, W. F. 1916. Statistics of the halibut fishery in the Pacific. Rept. B. C. Commissioner of Fisheries for 1915 (1916): 65–126.Google Scholar
  57. Thompson, W. F. 1917. Regulation of the halibut fishery of the Pacific. Rept. B. C. Commissioner of Fisheries for 1916 (1917): 23–34.Google Scholar
  58. Thompson, W. F. and F. Heward Bell. 1934. Biological statistics of the Pacific halibut fishery (2). Effect of changes in intensity upon total yield and yield per unit of gear. Rept. Internatl. Fish. Comm. 8: 49 p.Google Scholar
  59. United States Congress. 1976. An Act to provide for the conservation and management of the fisheries, and for other purposes. Public Law 94–265, 94th Congress, HR 200, April 13, 1976, 90 Stat: 331–361.Google Scholar
  60. Weber, Douglas and George J. Ridgway. 1967. Marking Pacific salmon with tetracycline antibiotics. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 24 (4): 849–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wilder, D. G. 1953. The growth rate of the American lobster (Homarus americanus). J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 10 (7): 371–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. L. McHugh
    • 1
  1. 1.Marine Sciences Research CenterState University of New York at Stony BrookLong IslandUSA

Personalised recommendations