Advertisement

Human Learning

  • Michael W. Eysenck

Abstract

There have been considerable changes in theoretical approaches to human learning and memory over the past 20 years or so. During the late 1960s and early 1970s, the emphasis was on the basic architecture of the human memory system. This structural approach found its apotheosis in the multistore model proposed by Atkinson and Shiffrin (1968, 1971). Disenchantment soon became manifest with this type of theorizing, in particular because it appeared to deemphasize the processes involved in learning and retrieval. As a consequence, Craik and Lockhart (1972) put forward their levels-of-processing theory, which focused on processes rather than on structure. This approach also fell into disfavor, in part because of the dawning realization that general theories of learning and memory (such as the multistore and levels-of-processing models) are likely to be grossly oversimplified.

Keywords

Recognition Memory Episodic Memory Semantic Memory Retrieval Process Human Learning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1972). Recognition and retrieval processes in free recall. Psychological Review, 79, 97–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, R. C., & Pichert, J. W. (1978). Recall of previously unrecallable information following a shift in perspective. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 2 ). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  4. Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1971). The control of short-term memory. Scientific American, 225, 82–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baddeley, A. D. (1984). Neuropsychological evidence and the semantic/episodic distinction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 238–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8 ). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bourne, L. E. (1966). Human conceptual behavior. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  9. Bower, G. H., Black, J. B., & Turner, T. J. (1979). Scripts in memory for text. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 177–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bransford, J. D. (1979). Human cognition: Learning, understanding and remembering. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  11. Bransford, J. D., Barclay, J. R., & Franks, J. J. (1972). Sentence memory: A constructive vs. interpretive approach. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brewer, W. F., & Treyens, J. C. (1981). Role of schemata in memory for places. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 207–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. Oxford: Pergamon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brooks, D. N., & Baddeley, A. D. (1976). What can amnesic patients learn? Neuropsychologia, 14, 111–122.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brooks, L. R. (1978). Nonanalytic concept formation and memory for instances. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., & Austin, G. A. (1956). A study of thinking. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Cohen, N. J. (1981). Neuropsychological evidence for a distinction between procedural and declarative knowledge in human memory and amnesia. Dissertation Abstracts International, 41, 4733B.Google Scholar
  18. Cohen, N. J. (1984). Preserved learning capacity in amnesia: Evidence for multiple memory systems. In L. R. Squire & N. Butters (Eds.), Neuropsychology of memory. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  19. Cohen, N. J., & Squire, L. R. (1980). Preserved learning and retention of pattern analyzing skill in amnesia: Dissociation of knowing how and knowing that. Science, 210, 207–210.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Corkin, S. (1969). Acquisition of motor skill after bilateral medial temporal-lobe excision. Neuropsychologia, 6, 225–265.Google Scholar
  21. Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dominowski, R. L. (1974). How do people discover concepts? In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Theories in cognitive psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  23. Eysenck, M. W. (1979). Depth, elaboration, and distinctiveness. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  24. Eysenck, M. W. (1984). A handbook of cognitive psychology. London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  25. Eysenck, M. W. (1986). Working memory. In G. Cohen, M. W. Eysenck, & M. E. Levoi (Eds.), Memory: A cognitive approach. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Franks, J. J., & Bransford, J. D. (1971). Abstraction of visual patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 65–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Friedman, A. (1979). Framing pictures: The role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 316–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gabrieli, J. D. E., Cohen, N. J., & Corkin, S. (1983). The acquisition of lexical and semantic knowledge in amnesia. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 9, 238.Google Scholar
  29. Gauld, A., & Stephenson, G. M. (1967). Some experiments relating to Bartlett’s theory of remembering. British Journal of Psychology, 58, 39–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Graesser, A. C., Woll, S. B., Kowalski, D. J., & Smith, D. A. (1980). Memory for typical and atypical actions in scripted activities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 503–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Graf, P., Squire, L. R., & Mandler, G. (1984). The information that amnesic patients do not forget. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 10, 164–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Huppert, F. A., & Piercy, M. (1976). Recognition memory in amnesic patients: Effect of temporal context and familiarity of material. Cortex, 4, 3–20.Google Scholar
  33. Jacoby, L. L. (1984). Incidental vs. intentional retrieval: Remembering and awareness as separate issues. In L. R. Squire & N. Butters (Eds.), Neuropsychology of memory. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  34. Jacoby, L. L., & Witherspoon, D. (1982). Remembering without awareness. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 300–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jones, G. V. (1978). Recognition failure and dual mechanisms in recall. Psychology Review, 85, 464–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jones, G. V. (1982). Tests of the dual-mechanism theory of recall. Acta Psychologica, 50, 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Keenan, J. M., MacWhinney, B., & Mayhew, D. (1977). Pragmatics in memory: A study of natural conversations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 549–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgement of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87, 252–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mandler, G., & Boeck, W. (1974). Retrieval processes in recognition. Memory and Cognition, 2, 613–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mandler, G., Pearlstone, Z., & Koopmans, H. J. (1969). Effects of organization and semantic similarity on recall and recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 410–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mayes, A., & Meudell, P. (1983). Amnesia. In A. Mayes (Ed.), Memory in animals and humans. Workingham, UK: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  42. Mayes, A. R., Meudell, P. R., & Pickering, A. (1985). Is organic amnesia caused by a selective deficit in remembering contextual information? Cortex, 21, 167–202.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Mervis, C. B., & Rosch, E. (1981). Categorization of natural objects. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 89–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Meudell, P., & Mayes, A. (1981). The Clarapede phenomenon: A further example in amnesics, a demonstration of a similar effect in normal people with attenuated memory, and a reinterpretation. Current Psychological Research, 1, 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. H. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  46. Osherson, D. N., & Smith, E. E. (1981). On the adequacy of prototype theory as a theory of concepts. Cognition, 9, 35–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Parkin, A. J. (1982). Residual learning capability in organic amnesia. Cortex, 18, 417–440.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Parkin, A. J. (1984). Amnesic syndrome: A lesion-specific disorder? Cortex, 20, 479–508.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Reitman, W. (1970). What does it take to remember? In D. A. Norman (Ed.), Models of human memory. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  50. Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. Spiro, B. Bruce, & W. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  51. Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson, 1949.Google Scholar
  52. Schank, R. C. (1976). The role of memory in language processing. In C. N. Cofer (Ed.), The structure of human memory. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
  53. Smith, D. A., & Graesser, A. C. (1981). Memory for actions in scripted activities as a function of typicality, retention interval, and retrieval task. Memory and Cognition, 9, 550–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization of memory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  55. Rulving, E. (1979). Relation between encoding specificity and levels of processing. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  56. Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Tulving, E. (1984). Précis of Elements of episodic memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 223–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 353–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zola-Morgan, S., Cohen, N. J. & Squire, L. R. (1983). Recall of remote episodic memory in amnesia. Neuropsychologia, 21, 487–500.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael W. Eysenck
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway and Bedford New CollegeUniversity of LondonEgham, SurreyUK

Personalised recommendations