The Vibrational Dynamics of Hydrogen Bonded Molecular Complexes at the State-to-State Level

  • Roger E. Miller
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSB, volume 227)


In recent years our understanding of the vibrational predissociation dynamics of weakly bound molecular complexes has improved greatly owing to both the experimental and theoretical advances that have been made in this area. We are now in the very fortunate position where both theory and experiment often can be brought to bare on the same system. The developments made in our laboratory involve the use of the opto-thermal detection technique to measure the infrared spectra and state-to-state dissociation rates for a number of these complexes. In the present report we examine the affects of molecular orientation on the rate of vibrational relaxation. This is done by measuring the predissociation lifetimes associated with several vibrational modes of different isomeric forms of a binary complex. The vibrational relaxation rates are found to be highly anisotropic and several interesting correlations can be made between this data and the collisional relaxation results already available in the literature.

In addition to the relaxation data obtained from measuring lifetimes, one also would like to obtain information on the disposal of excess energy in the fragments which result from vibrational predissociation of the parent complex. This clearly involves the measurement of state-to-state dissociation rates for these complexes. Results of this type have recently been obtained from measurements of the angular distributions of the photofragments and will be discussed for systems such as HF and HCN dimers. In favorable cases data of this type can provide relative state-to-state rates which can be used as sensitive tests of the emerging theoretical methods. Comparisons with simple statistical theories show that the dissociation dynamics associated with these systems is highly non-statistical.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R.E. Miller, Science, 240: 447 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    G.D. Hayman, J. Hodge, B.J. Howard, J.S. Muenter and T.R. Dyke, Chem. Phys. Lett. 118: 12 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    D.J. Nesbitt, Chem. Rev. 88: 843 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Z.S. Huang and R.E. Miller, J. Chem. Phys. 90: 1478 (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M.P. Cassassa, J.C. Stephenson and D.S. King, J. Chem. Phys. 85: 2233 (1986).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D.C. Dayton, K.W. Jucks and R.E. Miller, J. Chem. Phys. 90: 2631 (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Z.S. Huang and R.E. Miller, J. Chem. Phys. 89: 5408 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    K.W. Jucks and R.E. Miller, J. Chem. Phys. 86: 6637 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    C.M. Lovejoy, M.D. Schuder and D.J. Nesbitt, J. Chem. Phys. 85: 4890 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R.J. Le Roy and J.S. Carley, Adv. Chem. Phys. 42:353 (1980). 11.J.M. Hutson, D.C. Clary and J.A. Beswick, J. Chem. Phys. 81: 4474 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 12.
    A.D. Buckingham, P.W. Fowler and J.M. Hutson, Chem. Rev. 88: 963 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 13.
    R.J. Le Roy, M.E. Lam and M.R. Davies, private communication.Google Scholar
  13. 14.
    K.W. Jucks and R.E. Miller, J. Chem. Phys. 88: 6059 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 15.
    T.E. Gough, R.E. Miller and G. Scoles, Appl. Phys. Lett. 30: 338 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 16.
    Z.S. Huang, K.W. Jucks and R.E. Miller, J. Chem. Phys. 85: 3338 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 17.
    D.C. Dayton and R.E. Miller, Chem. Phys. Lett. 143: 181 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 18.
    G.S. Arnold, R.P. Fernando and I.W.M. Smith, J. Chem. Phys. 73: 2773 (1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 19.
    P.A. Block, K.W. Jucks, L.G. Pedersen and R.E. Miller, Chem. Phys., in press.Google Scholar
  19. 20.
    manuscripts in preparationGoogle Scholar
  20. 21.
    P.D. Aldrich, S.G. Kukolich and E.J. Campbell, J. Chem. Phys. 78: 3521 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 22.
    H.K. Shin, J. Chem. Phys. 49: 3964 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 23.
    J.C. Light, Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 44: 14 (1967).Google Scholar
  23. 24.
    N. Halberstadt, Ph. Brechignac, J.A. Beswick and M. Shapiro, J. Chem. Phys. 84: 170 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 25.
    K.W. Jucks and R.E. Miller, J. Chem. Phys. 87: 5629 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 26.
    C.M. Lovejoy, D.D. Nelson and D.J. Nesbitt, J. Chem. Phys. 87:5621 (1987); J. Chem. Phys. 89: 7180 (1988).Google Scholar
  26. 27.
    D.J. Nesbitt, C.M. Lovejoy, T.G. Lindeman, S.V. ONeil and D.C. Clary, J. Chem. Phys. 91: 722 (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roger E. Miller
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations