Current Problems and Future Prospects for Polyatomic Van der Waals Molecules and Small Clusters: Experiments

  • William Klemperer
  • David Yaron
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSB, volume 227)


The topic of Van der Waals molecules has been reviewed repeatedly for a number of years and is likely to continue to attract widespread attention.[1, 2, 3, 4] There are a variety of reasons for this interest, although clearly the role of intermolecular forces in the aggregation of matter is the major motivating force. The characterization of the bound states arising from an intermolecular potential is made possible by a wonderful variety of tools. Introspectively, some of the enjoyment of this subject, the spectroscopy of weakly bonded complexes, has been that much of the early work in this area was intrinsically detailed high resolution spectroscopy which provided relatively definitive experimental data. Thus from the early work of Harry Welsh and his students[5], it was clear that the spectroscopic studies of bound states could indeed provide us with a reliable data base upon which to discuss intermolecular forces. It is fair to point out that the relative complexity of the molecular dynamics that occur for non-rigid systems requires a great amount of high resolution data to provide a sense of assurance in one’s structural conclusions. This type of data is in hand for a number of binary complexes, thus much progress has been made toward determining and understanding the detailed nature of anisotropic intermolecular forces.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Van der waals interactions. Chemical Reviews, 88 (6): 815–988, 1988.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    A. Weber, editor. Structure and Dynamics of Weakly Bound Molecular Cornplexes. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1987.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    William Klemperer, David Yaron, and David D. Nelson Jr. Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc., 86: 261, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    E.R. Bernstein, editor. Atomic and Molecular Clusters. Elsevier, 1989.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    see for example A.R.W. Mckellar pg.141–147 in ref. 2.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    G. Fraser has pointed out to us that higher energy isomers are usually observed in helium expansions.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    A.M. Smith and K.K. Lehmann. (to be published).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    A.M. Smith. PhD thesis, Harvard University, 1988.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    P. Bottschwina. Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc., 81: 73, 1986.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    P. Bottschwina. Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc., 84: 1263, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    R.G. Gordon and Y.S. Kim. J. Chem Phys., 56: 3122, 1972.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    A.D. Buckingham and P.W. Fowler. Can. J. Chem., 63: 2018, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    A.J. Stone. Chem. Phys. Lett., 83: 233, 1981ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    A.J. Stone and M. Alderton. Molec. Phys., 56: 1047, 1985ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    R.J. Leroy and J.S. Carley. Adv. Chem. Phys.,42:353, 1980. (see early discussions).Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    R.L. Robinson, D. Ray, D.H. Gwo, and R.J. Saykaly. J. Chem Phys., 86: 5211, 1987.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    R.L. Robinson, D. Ray, D.H. Gwo, and R.J. Saykaly. J. Chem Phys., 87: 5149, 1987.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    J.M. Hutson and B.J. Howard. Mol. Phys., 43: 493, 1981.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    J.M. Hutson and B.J. Howard. Mol. Phys., 45: 769, 1982.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    J. Hutson. Public Comment, Bonas, France Aug. 21, 1989.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    B.J. Howard and A.S. Pine. Chem. Phys. Lett., 122: 1, 1985.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    K.R. Leopold, G.T. Fraser, F.J. Lin, D.D. Nelson, Jr., and W. Klemperer. J. Chem Phys., 81: 4922, 1984.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    T.D. Klots, C.E. Dykstra, and H.S. Gutowski. J. Chem Phys., 90, 1989.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    M. Marshall, H. Leung, and W. Klemperer. (poster at this conference).Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    G.T. Fraser and A.S. Pine. J. Chem Phys., 91: 3319, 1989.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    David Clary. (at this conference).Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    D. Nesbitt. Chemical Reviews, 88: 843, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • William Klemperer
    • 1
  • David Yaron
    • 1
  1. 1.Harvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations