A Combined Genetic and Mosaic Approach to the Study of Oogenesis in Drosophila

  • Eric Wieschaus
Part of the Basic Life Sciences book series (BLSC, volume 16)

Abstract

An embryologist usually becomes interested in oogenesis with the realization that many of the decisions made by the cells in the early embryos reflect a distribution of determinants present in some form already in the egg prior to fertilization. This allows us to reduce the question of why different regions of the blastoderm have different embryonic fates into two subquestions: (1) How do the different regions of the egg cytoplasm become different from each other? (2) How are these initial cytoplasmic differences interpreted by the individual blastoderm cells in choosing their particular fates?

Keywords

Migration Recombination 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    E. Wieschaus, J.L. Marsh, and W.J. Gehring, fs(1)K10: A germ line-dependent female sterile mutation causing abnormal chorion morphology in Drosophila melanogaster, Wilhelm Roux Arch. Entwicklungsmech. Organismen 184: 75 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Lohs-Schardin, C. Cremer, and C. Nüsslein-Volhard, A fate map for the larval epidermis of Drosophila melanogaster: localized cuticle defects following irradiation of the blastoderm with an ultraviolet laser microbeam, Devel. Biol. 73: 239 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R.C. King, “Ovarian Development in Drosophila melanogaster”, Academic Press, New York (1970).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    K.S. Gill, Developmental genetic studies on oogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster, J. Exp. Zool. 152: 251 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. Wieschaus, and J. Szabad, The development and function of the female germ line in Drosophila melanogaster: A cell lineage study, Devel. Biol. 68: 29 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Gans, C. Audit, and M. Masson, Isolation and characterization of sex-linked female sterile mutants in Drosophila melanogaster, Genetics 81: 683 (1975).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    E. Wieschaus, C. Audit, and M. Masson, in preparation.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gloor, Schadigungsmuster eines Letalfaktors (Kr) von Drosophila melanogster. Arch. Julius Maus Stift. Vererbungsforsth. Sozialanthropol Rassenhyg., 25: 38 (1950).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Bull, Bicaudal, a genetic factor which affects the polarity of the embryo in Drosophila melanogaster, J. Exp. Zool. 161: 221 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. Nüsslein-Volhard, Genetic analysis of pattern formation in the Drosophila melanogaster embryo. Characterization of the maternal effect mutant bicaudal. Wilhem Roux Arch. Entwicklungsmech. Organismen 183: 249 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    C. Nüsslein-Volhard, and E. Wieschaus, in preparation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric Wieschaus
    • 1
  1. 1.European Molecular Biology LaboratoryHeidelbergFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations