Summary
The implications of the nucleosomal structure of chromatin for the distribution and repair of DNA lesions is of obvious interest. The “bulky” purine adducts formed in human cells by the highly reactive ultimate carcinogens N-acetoxy-2-acetylaminofluorene (AAAF), benzo(a)pyrene-diol-epoxide I (BPDE I) and benzo(a)pyrene-4,5-epoxide were all introduced in higher initial concentrations in nucleosomal linker- than in core-DNA. In contrast, comparable adduct concentrations in linker- and core-DNA were observed after prolonged exposure of actively metabolizing human lung cells to the procarcinogen benzo(a)pyrene. Since different distribution and repairability of structurally identical lesions may mean different biological potency extrapolation of results of in vitro mutagenesis and transformation using ultimate carcinogens to the in vivo situation where procarcinogens are metabolized in the target organ has to be done with caution.
No simple rule can be derived for the relative rates of adduct removal from core- and linker-DNA in human cells. While the BPDE I guanine adducts were removed with similar efficiency from both DNA fractions the AAAF adducts disappeared much more rapidly from linker DNA of confluent human fibroblasts. Under certain conditions large fractions of adducts persisted in the DNA over an extended period.
The observed non-random introduction of lesions into chromatin can be exploited to approach basic questions about the dynamic properties of chromatin in situ. Using AAAF and repair deficient confluent cultures of Xeroderma pigmentoswn fibroblasts we have obtained evidence which arques strongly against the existence of constitutive movement of nucleosomes. In a second series of experiments AAAF was used to probe the structure of Simian Virus 40 (SV 40) minichromosomes in situ in monkey kidney cells. It was found that the replication origin region of SV 40 DNA was more open to the attack by the agent than the rest of the genome. These results lend direct “in vivo” support to the electronmicroscopic observation that the origin region of isolated SV 40 minichromosomes was nucleosome depleted.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R. Kornberg, Structure of Chromatin, Ann. Rev. Biochem. 46: 931 (1977).
P. Chambon. Summary: The molecular biology of the eukaryotic genome is coming of age. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 42: 1209 (1977).
G. Felsenfeld, Chromatin, Nature 271: 115 (1978).
V. Foe, Modulation of ribosomal RNA synthesis in Oncopeltus fasciatus: An electron microscopic study of the relationship between changes in chromatin structure and transcriptional activity. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 42: 723 (1977).
See in:“DNA Repair Mechanisms”, P.C. Hanawalt, E.C. Friedberg and C.F. Fox, eds., Academic Press, New York (1978).
P. Hanawalt, P. Cooper, A. Ganesan, and C. Smith, DNA Repair in Bacteria and Mammalian Cells, Ann. Rev. Biochem. 48: 783 (1979).
W. Bodell, Non-uniform distribution of DNA repair in chromatin after treatment with MMS, Nucl. Acid. Res. 4: 2619 (1977).
J. Cleaver, Nucleosome structure controls rates of excision repair in DNA of human cells, Nature 270: 451 (1977).
M. Smerdon, T. Tlsty, and M. Lieberman, Distribution of ultraviolet-induced DNA repair synthesis in nuclease sensitive and resistant regions of human chromatin, Biochemistry 17: 2377 (1978).
M. Smerdon, and M. Lieberman, Nucleosome rearrangement in human chromatin during UV-induced repair synthesis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 75: 4238 (1978).
F. Oleson, B. Mitchell, A. Dipple, and M. Lieberman, Distribution of damage in chromatin and its relation to repair in human cells treated with 7-bromomethylbenzo(a)anthracene, Nucl. Acid. Res. 7: 1343 (1979).
R. Ramanathan, S. Rajalkshmi, D. Sarma, and E. Farber, Non-random nature of in vivo methylation by DMN and subsequent removal of methylated products from rat liver chromatin, Cancer Res. 36: 2073 (1976).
G. Metzger, F. Wilhelm, and M. Wilhelm, Non-random binding of a chemical carcinogen to the DNA in chromatin, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 75: 703 (1977).
C. Jahn, and G. Litman, Distribution of covalently bound benzo(a)pyrene in chromatin, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 76: 534 (1977).
P. Cerutti, Repairable Damage in DNA, in:“DNA Repair Mechanisms”, P. C. Hanawalt, E. C. Friedberg, and C. F. Fox, eds. pp 1–14, Academic Press, New York (1978).
G. Feldman, J. Remsen, K. Shinohara, and P. Cerutti, Excisability and persistence of benzo(a)pyrene DNA adducts in epithelioid human lung cells, Nature 274: 796 (1978).
G. Feldman, J. Remsen, V. Wang, and P. Cerutti, Formation and excision of covalent DNA adducts of benzo(a)pyrene-4,5-epoxide and benzo(a)pyrene diol-epoxide I in human lung cells A549, Biochemistry 19: 1095 (1980).
J. Williams,and E. Friedberg, Deoxyribonucleic acid excision repair in chromatin after ultraviolet irradiation of human fibroblasts in culture, Biochemistry 18: 3965 (1979).
M. Kaneko, and P. Cerutti, Excisability of N-acetoxy-2-acetylaminofluorene induced DNA adducts from chromatin fractions of human fibroblasts, Cancer Res, in press.
P. Cerutti, F. Sessions, P. Hariharan, and A. Lusby, Repair of DNA damage induced by benzo(a)pyrene-diol-epoxides I and II in human alveolar tumor cells, Cancer Res. 38: 2118 (1978).
H. Brown, A. Jeffrey, and I. Weinstein, Formation of DNA adducts in 10T 1/2 mouse embryo fibroblasts incubated with benzo(a)pyrene or dihydrodiol oxide derivatives, Cancer Res. 39: 1673 (1979).
J. Westra, E. Kriek, and H. Hittenhausen, Ìdentification of the persistently bound form of the carcinogen N-acetyl-2-aminofluorene to rat liver DNA in vivo, Chem.-Biol. Int. 15:149 (1976) and refs. therein.
M. Poirier, M. Dubin, and S. Yuspa, Formation and removal of specific acetylaminofluorene-DNA adducts in mouse and human cells measured by radioimmunoassay, Cancer Res. 39: 1377 (1979).
D. Lohr, J. Corden, K. Tatchell, R. Kovacic, and K. Van Holde, Comparative subunit structure of HeLa, yeast and chicken erythrocyte chromatin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 74: 79 (1977).
P. Beard, Mobility of histones on the chromosome of Simian Virus 40, Cell 15: 955 (1978).
M. Lieberman, M. Smerdon, T. Tlsty, and F. Oleson, “The role of chromatin structure in DNA repair in human cells damaged with chemical carcinogens and ultraviolet radiation, in:”Environmental Carcinogenesis, Occurrence, Risk Evaluation and Mechanisms“, P. Emmelot, and E. Kriek, eds., Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam (1979).
S. Saragosti, G. Moyne, and M. Yaniv, Absence of nucleosomes in a fraction of SV 40 chromatin between the origin of replication and the region codino for the late leader RNA, Cell 20: 65 (1980).
E. Jakobovits, S. Bratosin, and Y. Aloni, A nucleosome-free region in SV 40 minichromosomes, Nature 285: 263 (1980).
P. Beard, M. Kaneko, and P. Ceruttf, unpublished.
F. Ahmed, and R. Setlow, Different rate-limiting steps in excision repair of ultraviolet-and N-acetoxy-2-acetylaminofluorene-damaged DNA in normal human fibroblasts, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 74: 1548 (1977).
A. Brown, T. Fickel, J. Cleaver, P. Lohman, M. Wade, and R. Waters, Overlapping pathways for repair of damage from ultraviolet light and chemical carcinogens in human fibroblasts, Cancer Res. 39: 2522 (1979).
R. Heflich, R. Hazard, L. Lommel, J. Schribner, V. Maher, and J. McCormick, A comparison of the DNA binding, cytotoxicity and repair synthesis induced in human fibroblasts by reactive derivatives of aromatic amide carcinogens, Chem.-Biol. Int. 29: 43 (1980).
R. Goth, and M. Rajewsky, Persistence of 06-ethylguanine in rat brain DNA: Correlation with nervous system specific carcino-genesis by ethylnitrosourea, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 71: 639 (1974).
A. Pegg, Formation and metabolism of alkylated nucleosides: possible role in carcinogenesis by nitroso compounds and alkylating agents. Adv. Cancer Res. 25: 195 (1977).
T. Cech, and M. Pardue, Cross-linking of DNA with trimethylpsoralen is a probe for chromatin structure, Cell 11: 631 (1977).
G. Wiesenhahn, J. Hyde, and J. Hearst, The photo-addition of trimethylpsoralen to Drosophila melanogaster nuclei: a probe for chromatin substructure, Biochemistry 16: 925 (1977).
P. Hale, R. Woodward, and J. Lebowitz, E. coli RNA polymerase promotors on superhelical SV 40 DNA are highly selective targets for chemical modification, Nature 284:640 (1980) and refs. therein.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1981 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cerutti, P., Kaneko, M., Beard, P. (1981). Nucleosomal Structure of Chromatin : Distribution and Excision of DNA Damage. In: Seeberg, E., Kleppe, K. (eds) Chromosome Damage and Repair. NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series, vol 40. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7956-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7956-0_7
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-7958-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-7956-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive