DNA Damage and Carcinogenesis
A number of independent lines of evidence, other than cell biology ones, support the somatic mutation theory of cancer. They indicate that damage to DNA can lead to cancer and hence one should be concerned about environmental agents that react with DNA. Nevertheless, there are arguments against this point of view (1) and, even if damage to DNA is the important element in cancer initiation, one should always keep in mind the possibilities that the switch from normal to cancer cells may arise from faulty transcription and hence translation (as seems to be the case in the death of UV-irradiated arrested human fibroblasts). Moreover, promotion steps subsequent to initiation may be of overriding importance at the initiation doses received at low exposure-rate levels.
KeywordsSkin Cancer Excision Repair Ataxia Telangiectasia Xeroderma Pigmentosum Ataxia Telangiectasia
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.H. Rubin, Is somatic mutation the major mechanism of malignant transformation?, J. Natl. Canc. Inst. USA 64: 995 (1980).Google Scholar
- 2.B. N. Ames, Identifying environmental chemicals causing mutations and cancer, Science 204.: 587 (1979).Google Scholar
- 9.E. C. Friedberg, U. K. Ehmann, and J. I. Williams, Human diseases associated with defective DNA repair, Adv. Radiat. Biol. 8: 85 (1979).Google Scholar
- 10.A. D. Andrews, S. F. Barret, and J. H. Robbins, Xeroderma pigmentosum abnormalities correlated with colony-forming ability after ultraviolet radiation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 75: 1984 (1978).Google Scholar
- 11.D. G. Harnden, Mechanisms of Genetic Susceptibility, in: “13th Jerusalem Symposium on Carcinogenesis: Fundamental Mechanisms and Environmental Effects,” D. Reidel, Dordrecht (1980).Google Scholar
- 14.T. Kakunaga, Relationship between transformation and mutation in mammalian cells, in: “13th Jerusalem Symposium on Carcinogenesis: Fundamental Mechanisms and Environmental Effects,” D. Reidel, Dordrecht (1980).Google Scholar
- 17.R. Mueller and M. F. Rajewsky, Sensitive radioimmunoassay for detection of O6-ethyldeoxyguanosine in DNA exposed to the carcinogen ethylnitrosourea in vivo or in vitro, Zeit. f. Naturforsch. 33C: 897 (1978).Google Scholar
- 19.M. C. Paterson, Use of purified Lesion-recognizing enzymes to monitor DNA repair in vivo, Adv. Radiat. Biol. 7: 1 (1978).Google Scholar
- 20.E. L. Scott and M. L. Straf, Ultraviolet radiation as a cause of cancer, in: “Origins of Human Cancer,” H. H. Hiatt, J. D. Watson, and J. A. Winston, eds., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, N. Y. (1977).Google Scholar
- 21.J. Scotto and T. Fears, quoted in: “Protection against depletion of stratosphere ozone by chlorofluorocarbons,” Natl. Acad. Sci., Washington (1979).Google Scholar