Sister-Chromated Exchanges as a Measure of Damage Produced by Visible Light on BrdUrd-Substituted Chromosomes

  • C. Gutiérrez
  • J. B. Schvartzman
Part of the NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series book series (NSSA, volume 40)


We have studied the effect of visible light irradiation on BrdUrd-substituted chromosomes in Allium cepa L. meristem cells by measuring the yields of SCEs. The efficiency of this treatment in provoking SCEs is clearly dependent on the cell cycle time in which damage occurs, having obtained the highest frequencies when VL exposure coincides with the initiation of the S phase. Nitrogen atmosphere during irradiation reduces SCE frequencies, suggesting that some oxidizing radical species could be involved in the chemical reactions producing lesions that ultimately lead to SCE formation. These results are discussed with respect to the hypothesis that SCEs arise as a consequence of the passage of a damaged DNA through the replication process.


Visible Light Irradiation Sister Chromatid Exchange Replication Process Xeroderma Pigmentosum Damage Treatment 



sister-chromatid exchanges




visible light




fluorescence plus Giemsa


xeroderma pigmentosum


Chinese hamster ovary


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    H. Kato, Spontaneous and induced sister chromatid exchanges as revealed by the BUdR-labeling method. Int. Rev. Cytol. 49: 55 (1977).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    C.F. Arlett and A.R. Lehmann, Human disorders showing increased sensitivity to the induction of genetic damage, Ann. Rev. Genet. 12: 95 (1978).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.B. Schvartzman, R. Postigo and C. Gutiérrez, Analysis of visible light-induced sister chromatid exchanges in 5-bromodeoxyuridine substituted chromosomes. Chromosoma 74: 317 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. González-Fernández, G. Giménez-Martín and C. de la Torre, The duration of the interphase periods at different temperatures in root tip cells, Cytobiologie 3: 367 (1971).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J.B. Schvartzman, F. Cortés, A. González-Fernández, C. Gutiérrez and J.F. López-Sáez, On the nature of sister-chromatid exchanges in 5-bromodeoxyuridine-substituted chromosomes, Genetics 92: 1251 (1979).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S.A. Latt and K.S. Loveday, Chracterization of sister chromatid exchange induction of 8-methoxypsoralen plus near UV light, Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 21: 184 (1978).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    P.A. Cerutti, Repairable damage in DNA, in: DNA repair mechanisms, P.C. Hanawalt, E.C. Friedberg and C.F. Fox, eds., Academic Press, New York (1978).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.E. Cleaver, DNA repair mechanisms and the generation of sister chromatid exchanges in human cell lines from xeroderma pigmentosum patients, in: Molecular Human Cytogenetics, R.S. Sparkes, D.E. Comings and C.F. Fox, eds., Academic Press, New York (1977).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Wolff, The induction of sister chromatid exchanges (SCE’s) by lesions whose lifetimes are affected by the cell’s excision repair capacity, Genetics Suppl. 91: 5138 (1979).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    W.D. MacRae, E.A. Mackinnon and H.F. Stich, The fate of UV-induced lesions affecting SCE’s, chromosome aberrations and survival of CHO cells arrested by deprivation of arginine. Chromosoma 72: 15 (1979).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    L.A. Smet and J.J. Cornelis, Repairable and irrepairable damage in 5-bromouracil-substituted DNA exposed to ultraviolet radiation. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 19: 445 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Gutiérrez
    • 1
  • J. B. Schvartzman
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto de Biologia CelularMadrid-6Spain

Personalised recommendations