From the Pragmatic to the Spiritual

An Intellectual Autobiography
  • Clare Cooper Marcus
Part of the Human Behavior and Environment book series (HUBE, volume 11)


I was born in 1934 in England and raised in the north London suburb of Finchley, except for the period of World War II, when I was evacuated to the country. I was educated in public and private schools, and in 1952 entered the University of London, where I majored in historical geography. I completed a master’s degree in cultural and urban geography at the University of Nebraska in 1958 under the direction of James E. Vance, Jr., and Leslie Hewes. After teaching cartography and working as an urban planner in Britain for 3 years, I returned to the United States as an immigrant in 1961. A second master’s degree in city and regional planning at the University of California, Berkeley, in 1965 under Melvin Webber turned my attention to the built environment and to the need for postoccupancy evaluation research in housing. After working for several years as a research associate in the Institute of Urban and Regional Development at Berkeley, I started to teach in the Department of Landscape Architecture in 1969. My entire teaching career has been at the University of California, Berkeley, where I am now a professor with a joint appointment in the Departments of Architecture and Landscape Architecture.


Design Guideline Housing Development Housing Project Design Student Landscape Architecture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M. et al (1977). A pattern language. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Anthony, K. (1981). International House: Home away from home? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Architecture, University of California.Google Scholar
  3. Anthony, K. (1989). Breaking up is hard to do: The meaning of home to parents and children of divorce. Paper presented at the International Housing Symposium, Gavle, Sweden. Architecture Research Unit. (1966). Courtyard and houses, Inchview, Prestonpans. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  4. Architecture Research Unit. (1969). Traffic separated layouts in Stevenage New Town. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  5. Avens, R. (1984). The new gnosis. Dallas: Spring Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Bachelard, G. (1964). The poetics of space. New York: Orion Press.Google Scholar
  7. Back, K. W. (1962). Slums, projects and people: Some psychological problems of relocation in Puerto Rico. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Becker, F. D. (1974). Design for living: The resident’s view of multifamily housing. Ithaca, NY: Center for Urban Development and Research, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  9. Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the implicate order. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Boudon, P. (1972). Lived-in architecture: Le Corbusier’s Pessac revisited. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bussard, E. (1974). Children’s spatial behavior in and around a moderate density housing development: An exploratory study of patterns and influences. Unpublished master’s thesis, Department of Design Analysis, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  11. Byrom, J. B. (1972). Shared open space in Scottish private enterprise housing. Edinburgh: Architecture Research Unit, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  12. Capra, F. (1975). The tao of physics. Berkeley: Shambhala.Google Scholar
  13. Capra, F. (1982). The turning point: Science, society and the rising culture. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  14. Christensen, K. (1982). Geography as a human science: A philosophic critique off the positivist-humanist split. In P. Gould and G. 011son (Eds.), Search for common ground. London: Pion Press.Google Scholar
  15. Committee on Housing Research and Development (1972). Families in public housing: An evaluation of three residential environments in Rockford, Illinois. (Research Report). Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  16. Connell, B. R. (1975). Behavioral science research for design decision-making: The processes of programming and evaluation and an evaluative case study of multi family housing. Unpublished master’s thesis, College of Human Ecology, Design and Environmental Analysis, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  17. Cooper, C. C. (1965). Some social implications of house and site plan design at Easter Hill Village: A case study. Center for Planning and Development Research. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
  18. Cooper, C. C. (1970a). Adventure playgrounds. Landscape Architecture, 18–29, 88–91.Google Scholar
  19. Cooper, C. C. (1970b). To Zima Junction and beyond: A journey across Russia on the Trans-Siberian Express. Landscape.Google Scholar
  20. Cooper, C. C. (1971a). Landmark ‘71. Annual Student Journal of Landscape Design Club, Department of Landscape Architecture. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
  21. Cooper, C. C. (1971b). St. Francis Square: Attitudes of its residents. AIA Journal, 22–27.Google Scholar
  22. Cooper, C. C. (1971c). The house as symbol of self. (Working paper #120.) Institute of Urban and Regional Development. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
  23. Cooper, C. C. (1972). Resident dissatisfaction in multi-family housing. In W. M. Smitth (Ed.), Behavior, design and policy aspects of human habitats (pp. 119–145 ). Green Bay: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  24. Cooper, C. C. (1974a). Children in residential areas: Guidelines for designers. Landscape Architecture, 65, 372–377, 415–419.Google Scholar
  25. Cooper, C. C. (1974b). The house as symbol of self. In J. Lang (Ed.), Design for human behavior (pp. 130–146 ). Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross.Google Scholar
  26. Cooper, C. C. (1975a). Children’s play behavior in low-rise, inner city housing development. In D. Carson (Ed.) (EDRA 6) (pp. 197–211 ). Washington, DC: Environmental Design Research Association.Google Scholar
  27. Cooper C. C. (1975b). Easter Hill Village: Some social implications of design. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  28. Cooper, C. C. (1976). The house as symbol of the self. In H. M. Proshansky, W. H. Ittleson, and L. G. Rivlin (Eds.), Environmental psychology: People and their physical settings (pp. 435–448, 2nd ed. ). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  29. Cooper, C. C., and Hackett, P. (1968). Analysis of the design process at two modern income housing developments. (Working paper #80.) Center for Planning and Development Research. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
  30. Davies, P. (1983). God and the new physics New York: Simon and Schuster, Inc. Department of the Environment (U.K.). (1971). New housing in a cleared area: A study of St. Mary’s oldham. (Design Bulletin 22). London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Google Scholar
  31. Department of the Environment (U.K.) (1972). The estate outside the dwelling: Reactions of residents to aspects of housing layout. (Design Bulletin 25 ). London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  32. Department of the Environment (U.K.) (1973). Children at play. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  33. Dovey, K. (1978). The dwelling experience: Towards a phenomenology of architecture. Unpublished master of architecture thesis, University of Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  34. Dovey, K. (1985). Home and homelessness. In I. Altman and C. Werner (Eds.), Home environments: Human behavior and environment (pp. 33–64 ). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  35. Dovey, K., and Cooper Marcus, C. (1990). Designing for community, (unpublished, forthcoming).Google Scholar
  36. Duncan, J. (1982). Housing and identity: Cross-cultural perspectives. New York: Holmes and Meier, Inc. The Eikos Group (Planning and Environmental Design Group Ltd., Vancouver). (1980). Children’s perceptions of a play environment: A study of three low cost housing developments in Vancouver. (Research Project 4 for International Year of the Child). Ottawa: Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation.Google Scholar
  37. Ellis, P. (1977). A social psychological study of the outside spaces in the Chalvedon housing area. London: Ahrends, Burton and Kuralek, Architects.Google Scholar
  38. Festinger, L., Schacter, S., and Back, K. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  39. Francescato, G., Weidemann, S., Anderson, J. R., and Chenoweth, R. (1980). Residents’ satisfaction in HUD-assisted housing: Design and management factors. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  40. Fried, M. (1963). Grieving for a lost home. In L. Duhl (Ed.), The urban condition (pp. 151–171 ). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  41. Fried, M., and Gleicher, P. (1961). Some sources of residential satisfaction in an urban slum. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 27, 305–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gans, H. (1961). Planning and social life: Friendship and neighbor relations in suburban communities. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 27, 134–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gans, H. (1962). The urban villagers. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  44. Gans, H. (1967). The Levittowners. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  45. Gatt, C. (1978). Privacy in private outdoor spaces in multi family housing projects. Unpublished master’s thesis, Department of Architecture, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
  46. Gilmour, A., Byrom, C., Campbell, S., Helgason, I., and Liddell, H. (1970). Low-rise high density housing study. Edinburgh: Architecture Research unit, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  47. Griffin, M. E. (1973). Mount Hope courts: A social physical evaluation. Unpublished American civilization senior honors thesis, Brown University.Google Scholar
  48. Halprin, L. (1979). A report on taking part at College of Environmental Design. Berkeley: Center for Environmental Design Research, University of California.Google Scholar
  49. Helphand, K. (1977). Environmental autobiography: An anthology (mimeo, unpublished). Helphand, K. (1978). Environmental autobiography. Childhood City Newsletter, 14, 8–11.Google Scholar
  50. Hester, R. (1979). A womb with a view. Landscape Architecture, 69, 475–481.Google Scholar
  51. Hillman, J. (1975). Re-Visioning Psychology. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  52. Hinshaw, M., and Allot, K. (1972). Environmental preferences of future housing consumers. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 38, 102–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hole, V. (1966). Children’s play on housing estates (National Building Studies research paper no. 39 ). London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  54. Howell, S. (1974). Needed: Performance specifications for using behavioral science. Industrialization Forum, 5, 25–29.Google Scholar
  55. Howell, S. (1980). Designing for aging: Pattern of use. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  56. Jacobs, J. (1961). Death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  57. Jephcott, P., and Robinson, H. (1971). Homes in high flats: Some of the human problems involved in multi-storey housing. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
  58. Jung, C. (1967). Memories, dreams, and reflections. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
  59. Keys, D. (1982). Earth at Omega: Passage to planetization. Boston: The Branden Press, Inc. Kockelmans, J. J. (1971). Phenomenological psychology in the United States: A critical analysis of the actual situation. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 1, 139–172.Google Scholar
  60. Kuper, L. (1953). Blueprints for living together. In L. Kuper (Ed.), Living in towns (pp. 7–202 ). London: Cresset Press.Google Scholar
  61. Ladd, F. C. (1977). Residential history: You can go home again, Landscape, 21, 15–20.Google Scholar
  62. Lamanna, R. A. (1964). Value consensus among urban residents. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 30, 317–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lansing, J., Marans, R. W., and Zehner, R. B. (1970). Planned residential environments. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  64. Lindheim, R., Glaser, H., and Coffin, C. (1972). Changing hospital environments for children. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Lovelock, J. (1979). Gaia: A new look at life on earth London: Oxford University Press. MacLeod, J. (1977). Open space and walk-up apartments: A case study of user needs and landscape design Unpublished practicum for master’s degree. Department of Landscape Architec-ture, University of Manitoba, Winnepeg. Mimeo.Google Scholar
  66. Madge, J. ( 1964, December). Privacy and social interaction. Paper delivered to the Bartlett Society, Mimeo.Google Scholar
  67. Maizel, J. (1961). Two to five in high flats. London: The Housing Center.Google Scholar
  68. Marcus, C. Cooper (1977). User needs research in housing. In S. Davis (Ed.), The form of housing (pp. 139–170 ). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  69. Marcus, C. Cooper (1978a). Evaluation: Rehabilitated housing at Hunter’s Point. American Institute of Architects’ Journal, 67, 48–55.Google Scholar
  70. Marcus, C. Cooper (1978b). Remembrances of landscape past. Landscape, 22, 34–43.Google Scholar
  71. Marcus, C. Cooper (1978c). Evaluation: A tale of two spaces. American Institute of Architects’ Journal, 67, 34–39.Google Scholar
  72. Marcus, C. Cooper (1979). Environmental autobiography. (Working paper #301). Institute of Urban and Regional Development. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
  73. Marcus, C. Cooper (1985). Environment and community: A case study of Findhorn, an alternative community in Scotland. In S. Klein, R. Werner, and S. Lehman (eds.), Environmental Change/Social Change: Proceedings of 16th Annual Conference of EDRA (pp. 144–154 ). New York: EDRA.Google Scholar
  74. Marcus, C. Cooper (1986a). Design as if people mattered. In S. Van Der Ryn and P. Calthorpe (Eds.), Sustainable design (pp. 121–129 ). San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.Google Scholar
  75. Marcus, C. Cooper (1986b). Design guidelines: A bridge between research and decision-making. In W. H. Ittleson, M. Asai, and M. Ker (Eds.), Cross cultural research in environment and behavior: Proceedings of the 2nd U.S.-Japan seminar (pp. 56–83 ). Tucson: University of Arizona (Reissued as a paper by Center for Environmental Design, Berkeley: University of California, 1986 ).Google Scholar
  76. Marcus, C. Cooper (1986c). House-as-haven, house-as-trap: Explorations in the experience of dwelling. Proceedings of annual conference of Associated Collegiate School of Architecture.Google Scholar
  77. Marcus, C. Cooper (1987). Alternative landscapes: Ley lines, Feng-Shui, and the Gaia Hypothesis. Landscape, 29, 1–10.Google Scholar
  78. Marcus, C. Cooper (1988). Pink palace to Rosa Parks Towers: High rise rehabilitation using environment and behavior research. Looking back to the future: Proceedings of the 10th Biennial Conference of the International Association for the study of People and their Physical Surroundings (LAPS) (pp. 411–420 ). Delft: Delft University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Marcus, C. Cooper (1990a). Designing for a commitment to place: Lessons from the alternative community Findhorn. In D. Seamon (Ed.), Dwelling, seeing and building: Toward a phenomenological ecology.Google Scholar
  80. Marcus, C. Cooper (1990b). The garden as a symbol of planet earth. In R. Hester and M. Francis (Eds.), The meaning of the garden. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  81. Marcus, C. Cooper and Francis, C. (Eds.). (1990). People places: Design guidelines for urban open space. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  82. Marcus, C. Cooper, and Hogue, L. (1977). Design guidelines for high-rise family housing. In D. J. Conway (Ed.), Human response to tall buildings (pp. 240–277 ). Stroudsburg, PA: Downden, Hutchison and Ross, Inc.Google Scholar
  83. Marcus, C. Cooper, and Moore, R. (1976). Children and their environment-A review of research. Journal of Architectural Education, 29, 22–25.Google Scholar
  84. Marcus, C. Cooper, and Sarkissian, W. (1986d). Housing as if people mattered: Site design guidelines for low rise medium-density family housing. Berkeley: University of California Press. Marcus, C. Cooper, and Wischemann, T. (1987b). Open spaces for living and learning. Landscape Architecture, 77, 52–61.Google Scholar
  85. Marcus, C. Cooper, Francis, C., and Meunier, C. (1987a). Mixed messages in suburbia: Reading the suburban model home. Places, 4, 24–37.Google Scholar
  86. Miller, A., and Cook, J. (1967). Radburn estates revisited: Report of a user study. Architect’s Journal, I.Google Scholar
  87. Ministry of Housing and Local Government (U.K.). (1969a). The family at home: A study of households in Sheffield. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Offfice.Google Scholar
  88. Ministry of Housing and Local Government (U.K.) (1969b). Family houses at West Ham: An account of the project with an appraisal. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  89. Ministry of Housing and Local Government (U.K.). (1970). Families living at high density: A study of estates in Leeds, Liverpool and London. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. McCamant, K., and Durrett, C. (1988). Co-housing: A contemporary approach to housing ourselves. Berkeley: Habitat Press.Google Scholar
  90. McLaughlin, C., and Davidson, G. (1986). Builders of the dawn: Community lifestyles in a changing world. Shutesbury, MA: Sirius Publishing.Google Scholar
  91. Norcross, C. (1973). Townhouses and condominiums; Residents’ likes and dislikes. (Institute Special Report). Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.Google Scholar
  92. O’Brien, N. J. (1971). A comparative behavioral study of row housing developments. Institute of Urban Studies, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, Canada.Google Scholar
  93. Osmon, F. L. (1972). Patterns for designing children’s centers. New York: Educational Facilities Laboratories.Google Scholar
  94. Parish, S., and Parish, D. (1972). A study of four Bridgeport housing developments. Bridgeport, CT: Zane Yost and Associates.Google Scholar
  95. Rainwater, L. (1966). Fear and the house-as-haven in the lower class. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 32, 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Rapoport, A. (1968). The personal element in housing: An argument for open-ended design. Royal Institute of British Architects’ Journal, 75, 300–307.Google Scholar
  97. Robinson, J. W. (1980). Images of housing in Minneapolis: A limited study of urban residents’ attitudes and values. Unpublished master’s thesis, Department of Architecture, University of Minnesota. Rosow, I. (1961). The social effects of the physical environment. Journal of The American Institute of Planners, 27, 127–133.Google Scholar
  98. Saile, D. G. et al (1972). Families in public housing: An evaluation of three residential environments in Rockford, Illinois. Champaign: Housing Research and Development Program, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  99. Russell, P. (1982). The awakening earth: The global brain. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Seamon, D. ( 1987 ). Phenomenology and environment-behavior research. In G. T. Moore andGoogle Scholar
  100. E. H. Zube (Eds.), Advances in environment, behavior, and design (pp. 3–27). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  101. Seeley, J. R. (1959). The slum: Its nature, uses and users. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25, 7–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Searles, H. (1960). The non-human environment in normal development and schizophrenia. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  103. Schon, A. (1963). Slums and social insecurity. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare. Social Security Administration.Google Scholar
  104. Shankland Cox and Associates. (1969). Private housing in London: People and environment in three Wates housing schemes. London: Author.Google Scholar
  105. Smith, H. (1984). Beyond the post-modern mind. Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House. Stevenson, A., Martin, E., and O’Neil, J. (1967). High living: A study of family life in flats. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  106. Stewart, W. F. R. (1970). Children in flats: A family study. London: National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children.Google Scholar
  107. Taylor, S., and Chave, S. (1964). Mental health and environment. London: Longmans. Thompson, W. I. (1973). Passages about earth. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  108. Thompson, W. I. (1982). From nation to emanation: Planetary culture and world goverance. Find-horn, Scotland: Findhorn Publications.Google Scholar
  109. Toyama, T. (1988). Identity and milieu. Stockholm: Department of Building Function Analysis, Royal Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  110. Tulin, S. J. (1978). Residents’ use of common areas in condominium developments. Unpublished master’s thesis, Department of Environmental Analysis, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  111. Ulrich, R. (1984). Views through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224, 420–421.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Ulrich, R. (1986). Human responses to vegetation and landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 13, 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Ulrich, R., and Simons, R. P. (1986). Recovery from stress during exposure to everyday outdoor environments. In J. Wineman, R. Barnes, and C. Zimring (Eds.), The cost of not knowing: Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of EDRA (pp. 115–122 ). Washington, DC: EDRA.Google Scholar
  114. Van der Ryn, S., and Silverstein, M. (1967). The dorms at Berkeley. Berkeley: University of Califor-nia, Center for Planning and Development Research.Google Scholar
  115. Vischer, J., and Marcus, C. Cooper (1982). Design awards: Who cares? In P. Bart, A. Chen, and G. Francescato (Eds.), Knowledge for design: Proceedings of the 13th international conference of the Environmental Design Research Association (pp. 210–223 ). College Park, MD: EDRA.Google Scholar
  116. Vischer, J., and Marcus, C. Cooper (1986). Evaluating evaluation: Analysis of a housing design awards program. Places: A quarterly journal of environmental design, 3, 66–85.Google Scholar
  117. Vycinas, V. (1969). Earth and gods: An introduction to the philosophy of Martin Heidegger. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  118. Wallace, A. C. F. (1952). Housing and social structure. Philadelphia: Philadelphia Housing Authority.Google Scholar
  119. Webb, E. J., Campbell, D. T., Schwartz, R. D., and Sechrest, L. (1966). Unabtrusive measures: Nonreactive research in the social sciences. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  120. Weidemann, S., and Anderson, J. (1979). Resident heterogeneity in multi family housing: A source of conflict in space. Urbana-Champaign: Housing Research and Development Program, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  121. White, L. E. (1946). Tenement town. London: Jason Press.Google Scholar
  122. White, R. W. (1957). A study of the relationship between mental health and the residential environment. Unpublished master of city planning thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  123. Whyte, W. (1980). The social life of small urban places. Washington, DC: The Conservative Foundation.Google Scholar
  124. Willis, M. (1963a). Designing for privacy: (1) What is privacy? The Architects’ Journal, 137, 1137 1141.Google Scholar
  125. Willis, M. (1963b). Designing for privacy: (2) Overlooking. The Architects’ Journal, 137, 1181 1187.Google Scholar
  126. Willis, M. (1963c). Designing for privacy: (3) Personal relationships. The Architects’ Journal, 12, 1231–1236.Google Scholar
  127. Willmott, P. (1964). Housing in Cumbernauld-Some residents’ opinions. Journal of the Town Planning Institute, 50, 195–200.Google Scholar
  128. Wilner, D. M., Walkley, R. P., Pinkerton, T. C., and Tayback, M. (1962). The housing environment and family life: A longitudinal study of the effects of housing on morbidity and mental health. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  129. Yancey, W. (1971). Architecture, interaction and social control: The case of a large-scale public housing project. Environment and Behaviour, 3, 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Young, M., and Willmott, P. (1957). Family and kinship in East London. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  131. Zeisel, J., and Griffin, M. E. (1975). Charlesview housing: A diagnostic evaluation. Cambridge: Architecture Research Office, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  132. Zeisel, J., Epp, G., and Demos, S. (1977). Low rise housing for older people: Behavioral criteria for design. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  133. Zuckar, G. (1979). The dancing Wu Li Masters: An overview of the new physics. New York: Bantam New Age Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Clare Cooper Marcus
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Architecture and Department of Landscape ArchitectureUniversity of California at BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations