In Search of Objectives

  • David Canter
Part of the Human Behavior and Environment book series (HUBE, volume 11)


When there were riots in Liverpool’s Toxteth district in the early 1980s, they led to the closure of the bank I and my father before me had used for over 30 years. This brought to an end the last remaining contact I had with a small area of Liverpool in which I had been born on January 5, 1944, where I had gone to the Hebrew Primary School and the Collegiate Grammar school. The same square mile also housed Liverpool University, where I had obtained my undergraduate degree in psychology in 1964 and my doctorate in 1968.


Housing Satisfaction Facet Theory Building Evaluation Office Size Architectural Education 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barker, R. G. (1965). Explorations in ecological psychology. American Psychologist, 20, 1–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BPRU. (1972). Building performance. London: Applied Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Bromley, D. B. (1986). Case study method in psychology and related disciplines. Chichester, England: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Canter, D. (1966). On appraising building appraisals. Architects’ Journal, December 21, 881–888.Google Scholar
  5. Canter, D. (1968). Office size: An example of psychological research in architecture. Architects’ Journal, April 24, 881–888.Google Scholar
  6. Canter, D. (1969). Should we treat building users as subjects or objects? In D. Canter (Ed.), Architectural psychology, London: RIBA Publications. (pp. 11–17 ).Google Scholar
  7. Canter, D. (1970). Need for a theory of function in architecture. Architects’ Journal, February 4, 299–302.Google Scholar
  8. Canter, D. (1972). A psychological analysis of The Royal Hospital for Sick Children: Yorkhill, Glasgow. Architects’ Journal, September 6, 525–564.Google Scholar
  9. Canter, D. (1974). Psychology for architects. London: Applied Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Canter, D. (1977). The psychology of place. London: Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  11. Canter, D. (1983). The purposive evaluation of places: A facet approach. Environment and Behaviour, 15 (6), 659–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Canter, D. (1985). (Ed.). Facet theory. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Canter, D. (1986). Putting situations in their place. In A. Furnham (Ed.), Social behaviour in context (pp. 208–239 ). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  14. Canter, D. (1987). Research agenda for therapy studies that consider the whole patient. Complementary Medicine Research, 2, 101–113.Google Scholar
  15. Canter, D. (1988). Action and place: An existential dialectic. In D. Canter, M. Krampen, & D. Stea (Eds.), Environmental perspectives (pp. 1–17 ). Aldershot, England: Avebury.Google Scholar
  16. Canter, D. (1989). Offender profiles. The Psychologist, 21 (1), 12–16.Google Scholar
  17. Canter, D., & Canter S. (1979). (Eds.). Designing for therapeutic environments Chichester, England: Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. Canter, D., & Rees, K. (1982). A multivariate model of housing satisfaction. International Review of Applied Psychology, 31, 185–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Canter, D., & Stringer, P. (1975). Environmental interaction. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  20. Canter, D., & Tagg, S. (1975). Distance estimation in cities. Environment and Behaviour, 7 (1), 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Canter, D., & Wools, R. (1970). A technique for the subjective appraisal of buildings. Building Science, 5, 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Canter, D., Breaux, J., & Sime, J. (1980). Domestic, multiple occupancy and hospital fires. In D. Canter (Ed.), Fires and human behaviour (pp. 117–136). Chichester: England: Wiley.Google Scholar
  23. Canter, D., Brown, J., & Groat, L. (1985). A multiple sorting procedure for studying conceptual systems. In M. Brenner, J. Brown, & D. Canter (Eds.), The research interview (pp. 79–114 ) London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  24. Canter, D., Powell, J., & Booker, K. (1987). Psychological aspects of informative fire warning systems. Borehamwood, England: Building Research Establishment.Google Scholar
  25. Canter, D., Krampen, M., & Stea, D. (Eds.). (1988). Environmental perspectives. Aldershot, England: Avebury.Google Scholar
  26. Canter, D., Comber, M., & Uzzell, D. (1989). Football in its place: An environmental psychology of football grounds. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Donald, I. (1985). The cylindrex of place evaluation. In D. Canter (Ed.), Facet theory (pp. 173–201 ). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fan, R. M., and Moscovici, S. (Eds.). (1984). Social representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Furnham, A. (Ed.). (1986). Social behavior in context. Boston: Allyn & Baker.Google Scholar
  30. Groat, L. (1982). Meaning in post-modern architecture: An examination using the multiple sorting task. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2 (1), 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Groat, L. (1985). Psychological aspects of contextual compatibility in architecture: A study of environmental meaning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Surrey, England.Google Scholar
  32. Groat, L., & Canter, D. (1979). Does post-modernism communicate? Progressive Architecture, 12, 84–87.Google Scholar
  33. Hearnshaw, L. S. (1987). The shaping of modern psychology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  35. Kenny, C., & Canter, D. (1981). A facet structure for nurses’ evaluations of wards designs. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 54, 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Manning, P. (Ed.). (1965). Office design: A study of environment. Liverpool, England: Department of Building Science.Google Scholar
  37. Omotayo, F. B. (1988). A cross-cultural comparison of space use in the Hausa, Ibo and Yoruba families of Nigeria. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Surrey, England.Google Scholar
  38. Peled, A., & Ayalon, O. (1988). The role of the spatial organisation in family therapy: Casestudy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 8 (2), 87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Powell, J., & Canter, D. (1985). Quantifying the human contribution to losses in the chemical industry. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 5, 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Quarantelli, E. L. (1957). The behavior of panic participants. Sociology and Social Research, 41, 187–194.Google Scholar
  41. Sommer, R. (1988). A better world not utopia. In D. Canter, M. Krampen, & D. Stea (Eds.), New directions in environmental participation (pp. 144–152). Aldershot, England: Avebury.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Canter
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of SurreyGuildford, SurreyEngland

Personalised recommendations