Verification of a Three-Dimensional Transport Model Using Tetroon Data from Projects State and Neros
No general procedure is available for calculation of parcel trajectories that demonstrates consistent accuracy over a broad range of conditions. Many techniques exist (Pack et al., 1978; Hoecker, 1977; Peterson, 1966), but most have limitations such as being site-specific, being applicable under only certain meteorological conditions or times of day, relying on the synoptic-scale rawinsonde network for wind data or being applicable to only specific levels in the atmosphere. Peterson (1966) provides particularly interesting comparisons of trajectories calculated using a number of standard diagnostic techniques. In general, procedures that are relatively successful in some situations, provide poor trajectory estimates in other situations. It is also difficult to determine a priori which procedure will be best in a given case. Thus, there is a need for a general and reliable technique for atmospheric transport computations.
KeywordsWind Field Planetary Boundary Layer Wind Data Project State Trajectory Calculation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bergman, K., McPherson, R., and Newell, J., 1974, A description of Flattery global analysis method-No. 1, Technical Procedures Bull. No. 90, National Weather Service, 9 pp.Google Scholar
- Blackadar, A. K., 1976, Modeling the nocturnal boundary layer, Third Symp. on Atmospheric Turbulence, Diffusion and Air Quality, Raleigh, NC, Oct. 9–12, Preprints, Amer. Meteor. Soc., Boston, pp. 46–49.Google Scholar
- Warner, T. T., 1981, Verification of a three-dimensional transport model using tetroon data from project STATE, Atmos. Envir., 15:in press.Google Scholar