In Vitro Propagation of Conifers: Fidelity of the Clonal Offspring

  • J. M. Bonga
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 210)


Conifer propagation in vitro is still largely restricted to propagation of juvenile, in most cases embryonic, material. So far, the main method of regeneration has been rooting of adventitious or axillary shoots. However, this method has found little commercial application because, 1) the propagation rates are too low, 2) the cost is too high, and 3) propagation is often not true-to-type. Fortunately, methods have been developed recently to induce somatic embryogenesis in cell cultures derived from embryo expiants. Somatic embryogenesis is better suited for mass propagation than rooting of adventitious or axillary shoots. Therefore, it is anticipated that commercial propagation of juvenile conifer material will soon be possible. Mature trees are far more difficult to clone by in vitro techniques than juvenile specimens. Our work with about 30-year-old Larix decidua trees has resulted in large-scale adventitious shoot formation, but little rooting. Some of the cultures have produced yellow, slimy cell masses which were similar in appearance to embryogenic masses obtained from embryo or megagametophyte explants. They contained bundles of long cells associated with small cells, but none of these developed into recognizable embryos. The potential applications of cloning in vitro in tree improvement schemes are discussed.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Abdullah, A.A., Grace, J., and Yeoman, M.M., 1989, Rooting and establishment of Calabrian pine plantlets propagated in vitro: Influence of growth substances, rooting medium and origin of explant. New Phytol. 113: 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aderkas, P. von, and Bonga, J.M., 1988, Formation of haploid embryoids of Larix decidua: early embryogenesis. Amer. J. Bot. 75: 690–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aderkas, P. von, Klimaszewska, K., and Bonga, J.N., 1990, Diploid and haploid embryogenesis in Larix leptolepis, L. decidua, and their reciprocal hybrids. Can. J. For. Res. 20: 9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aitken-Christie, J., Singh, A.P., and Davies, H., 1988, Multiplication of meristematic tissue: A new tissue culture system for radiata pine, in: Genetic Manipulation of Woody Plants, J.W. Hanover, and D.E. Keathley, eds., Plenum Press, New York, pp. 413–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Amerson, H.V., Frampton, L.J., Mott, R.L., and Spaine, P.C., 1988, Tissue culture of conifers using loblolly pine as a model, in: Genetic Manipulation of Woody Plants, J.W. Hanover, and D.E. Keathley, eds., Plenum Press, New York, pp. 117–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bonga, J.M., and Aderkas P. von, 1988, Attempts to micropropagate mature Larix decidua Mill., in: Somatic Cell Genetics of Woody Plants, M.R. Ahuja, ed., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carson, M.J., 1986, Advantages of clonal forestry for Pinus radiata: Real or imagined?. N.Z. J. For. Sci. 16: 403–415.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Franclet, A., Boulay, M., Bekkaoui, F., Fouret, Y., Verschoore-Martouzet, B., and Walker, N., 1987, Rejuvenation, in: Cell and Tissue Culture in Forestry, Vol. 1, General Principles and Biotechnology, J.M. Bonga, and D.J. Durzan, eds., Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 232–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gupta, P.K., and Durzan, D.J., 1986, Isolation and cell regeneration of protoplasts from sugar pine (Pinus banksiana). Plant Cell Rep. 5: 346–348.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Horgan, K., and Holland, L., 1989, Rooting micropropagated shoots from mature radiata pine. Can. J. For. Res. 19: 1309–1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Inglis, J.E., 1984, The effects of some growth substances on the promotion and rooting of interfascicular shoots in Pinus caribaea Morelet. Commonw. For. Rev. 63: 115–120.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mohammed, G.H., Dunstan, D.I., and Thorpe, T.A., 1986, Influence of nutrient medium upon shoot initiation on vegetative expiants excised from 15- to 18-year-old Picea glauca. N.Z. J. For. Sci. 16: 297–305.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Norton, M.E., and Norton, C.R., 1986, An alternative to in vitro propagation — axillary shoot enhancement on whole plants. J. Hortic. Sci. 61: 423–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Qureshi, J.A., Kartha, K.K., Abrams, S.R., and Steinhauer, L., 1989, Modulation of somatic embryogenesis in early and late-stage embryos of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under the influence of (+)-abscisic acid and its analogs. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 18: 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ritchie, G.A., and Long, A.J., 1986, Field performance of micropropagated Douglas fir. N.Z. J. For. Sci. 16: 343–356.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sheffield, E., 1984, Effects of dimethyl sulfoxide on the gametophytic and sporophytic phases of Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn. Ann. Bot. 54: 531–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shelbourne, C.J.A., Carson, M.J., and Wilcox, M.D., 1989, New techniques in the genetic improvement of radiata pine. Commonw. For. Rev. 68: 191–201.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sommer, H.E., Brown, C.L., and Rormanik, P.P., 1975, Differentiation of plantlets in longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) tissue cultured in vitro. Bot. Gaz. 136: 196–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Timmis, R., and Ritchie, G.A., 1988, Epigenetic effects in clonal propagation, in: Proceedings of the Tenth North American Forest Biology Workshop, Vancouver, July 20–22, pp. 12–31.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tsogas, M., and Bouriquet, R., 1982, Propagation de l’épicéa par culture in vitro d’embryons et de plantules. Ann. Rech. Sylvicoles, AFOCEL, pp. 345–367.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. M. Bonga
    • 1
  1. 1.Forestry Canada Maritimes RegionFrederictonCanada

Personalised recommendations