Application of Somatic Embryogenesis to Clonal Propagation of Interior Spruce

  • D. R. Roberts
  • F. B. Webster
  • B. S. Flinn
  • W. R. Lazaroff
  • S. M. McInnis
  • B. C. S. Sutton
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 210)


Seventy one lines (genotypes) of embryogenic cultures from six open pollinated families were obtained by culturing immature embryos of interior spruce. Induction frequencies varied among families and was also affected by cone collection date. Comparison of the SDS-PAGE protein profiles of embryo expiants from different collection dates revealed that embryos were most competent for embryogenesis during the period of development that directly preceded significant accumulation of storage protein. In order to optimize the maturation protocol, cultures from each genotype were screened through a range of abscisic acid (ABA) concentrations. The ABA-dependent developmental profile (the proportion of shooty embryos, precociously germinating embryos and mature embryos) differed among genotypes but, in general, production of somatic embryos was highest at 40 and 60 μM ABA. At these concentrations of ABA, embryos from most genotypes did not germinate precociously and entered a period of quiescence. Germination of eight genotypes tested was markedly enhanced after partial drying of mature embryos at high relative humidity. After one week, root emergence averaged 67% for somatic embryos treated with partial drying compared with 0% for non-treated controls. Emblings derived from this method were vigorous and acclimatized well to soil. Survival of emblings following transfer to soil, acclimatization and the first season’s growth in the nursery was 80% or greater for most genotypes and averaged 83% overall. Growth of emblings during the first season averaged 8.5 cm and was equivalent to that of seedlings.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ammirato, P.V. 1974. The effects of abscisic acid on the development of somatic embryos from cells of caraway (Carum carvi L.). Bot. Gaz. 135:328–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    von Arnold, S. and Erikkson, T. 1977. A revised medium for growth of pea mesophyll protoplasts. Physiol. Plant 39:257–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    von Arnold, S., and Hakman, I. 1988. Regulation of somatic embryo development in Picea abies by abscisic acid (ABA). J. Plant Physiol. 132:164–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    von Arnold, S., and Woodward, S. 1988. Organogenesis and embryogenesis in mature zygotic embryos of Picea sitchensis. Tree Physiol. 4:291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Becwar, M.R., Wann, S.R., Johnson, M.A., Verhagen, S.A., Feirer, R.P. and Nagmani, R. 1988. Development and characterization of in vitro embryogenic systems in conifers. In: M.R. Ahuja [Ed.], Somatic cell genetics of woody plants, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Becwar, M.R., Noland, T.L. and Wann, S.R. 1987. A method for quantification of the level of somatic embryogenesis among Norway spruce callus lines. Plant Cell Rep. 6:35–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bewley, J.D. and Black, M. 1985. Maturation Drying-The effects of water loss on developmental events. In: Seeds: Physiology of Development and Germination. Plenum Publishing Corp. New York, NY. pp 70–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boulay, M.P., Gupta, P.K., Krogstrup, P. and Durzan, D.J. 1988. Development of somatic embryos from cell suspension cultures of Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.). Plant Cell Rep. 7:134–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bourgkard, F., and Favre, J.M. 1988. Somatic embryos from callus of Sequoia sempervirens. Plant Cell Reports 7:445–448.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brown, C.L., Gifford, E.M. 1958. The relation of the cotyledons to root development of pine embryos grown in vitro. Plant Physiol. 33:57–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Driver, J.A. and Suttle, G.R.L. 1987. Nursery Handling of Propagules. In: Cell and Tissue Culture in Forestry. Vol. 2. Specific Principles and Methods: Growth and Developments. Edts. J.M. Bonga and D.J. Durzan. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht. The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dunstan, D.I. 1988. Prospects and progress in conifer biotechnology. Can. J. For. Res. 18:1497–1506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dunstan, D.I., Bekkaoui, F., Pilon, M., Fowke, L.C. and Abrams, S.R. 1988. Effects of abscisic acid and analogues on the maturation of white spruce (Picea glauca) somatic embryos. Plant Science 58:77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Durzan, D.J. and Gupta, P.K. 1987. Somatic embryogenesis and polyembryogenesis in Douglas-fir cell suspension cultures. Plant Science 52:229–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Feirer, R.P., Conkey, J.H. and Verhagenm S.A. 1989. Triglycerides in embryogenic conifer calli: a comparison with zygotic embryos. Plant Cell Reports 8:207–209.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hakman, I. and von Arnold, S. 1985. Plantlet regeneration through somatic embryogenesis in Picea abies (Norway spruce). J. Plant Physiol. 121:149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hakman, I. and von Arnold, S. 1988. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from suspension cultures of Picea glauca (White spruce). Physiol. Plant. 72:579–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Horgan, K. 1987. Pinus Radiata. In: Cell and Tissue Culture in Forestry. Vol. 3. Case Histories: Gymnosperms, Angiosperms and Palms. Edts. J.M. Bonga and D.J. Durzan. Martinus Nijhoff, The Netherlands, pp 128–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kermode, A.R. and Bewley, J.D. 1985. The role of maturation drying in the transition from seed development to germination. J.Exp. Bot. 36:1906–1915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kermode, A.R. and Bewley, J.D. 1989. Developing seed of Ricinus communis L., detached and maintained in an atmosphere of high relative humidity, switch to germinative mode without the requirement for complete desiccation. Plant Physiol. 90:702–707.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Krogstrup, P. 1986. Embryo-like structures from cotyledons and ripe embryos of Norway spruce (Picea abies). Can. J. For. Res. 16:664–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    McKeand, S.E. and Allen, H.L. 1984. Nutritional and root development factors affecting growth of tissue culture plantlets of loblolly pine. Physiol. Plant. 61:523–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Owens, J.N. and Molder, M. 1984. The reproductive cycle of interior spruce. British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Information Services Branch; Victoria, British Columbia.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Parrott, W.A., Dryden, G., Vogt, S., Hilderbrand, D.F., Collins, G.B., Williams, E.G. 1988. Optimization of somatic embryogenesis and embryo germination in soybean. In Vitro Cell. and Dev. Biol. 24:817–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Raghaven, V. 1986. Experimental embryogenesis. In: Embryogenesis in Angiosperms. A Developmental and Experimental Study. Cambridge Univ. Press. pp. 103–110.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Redenbaugh, K., Paasch, B.D., Nichol, J.W., Kossler, M.E., Viss, P.R. & Walker, K.A. 1986. Somatic Seeds: Encapsulation of asexual plant embryos. Bio/tech. 4:797–781.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Roberts, D.R., Flinn, B.S., Webb, D.T., Webster, F.B. and Sutton, B.C.S. 1990. Abscisic acid and indole-3-butyric acid regulation of maturation and accumulation of storage proteins in somatic embryos of interior spruce. Physiol. Plant. 78:355–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Webb, D.T., Webster, F., Flinn, B.S., Roberts, D.R. and Ellis, D.E. 1989. Factors influencing the induction of embryogenic and caulogenic callus form embryos of Picea glauca and P. engelmannii. Can. J. For. Res. 19 (10):1303–1308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Woodstock, L.W. 1988. Seed Imbibition: A critical period for successful germination. J. Seed Technol. 12:1–15.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. R. Roberts
    • 1
  • F. B. Webster
    • 1
  • B. S. Flinn
    • 1
  • W. R. Lazaroff
    • 1
  • S. M. McInnis
    • 1
  • B. C. S. Sutton
    • 1
  1. 1.Forest Biotechnology CentreBritish Columbia Research CorporationVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations