Abstract
Embryonal-suspensor masses (ESMs) from seven commercial genotypes of Douglas fir are distinguished from embryogenic calluses by origin, cytochemical staining and developmental sequence. Zygotic ESMs with a dominant embryo can be rescued and new embryos multiplied and reconstituted in darkness by cleavage and budding polyembryony without a callus phase. New ESMs can also be induced directly on the surface of developing embryos. By contrast, the recovery of embryos derived from an intermediary callus phase follows a spatio-temporal wave of activity from the radicle towards the cotyledons starting 4 to 8 weeks after fertilization. In all embryo recovery systems, callus formation and teratogenic structures may be avoided by careful subculture, minimal exposure to low levels of plant hormones, and by selection of true-to-type ESMs grown in darkness.
Callusing of protodermal cells is promoted in light. The dedifferentiated cells can be induced to redifferentiate back into embryogenic ESMs in darkness. Callus-based regenerative processes can be followed microscopically by the increased formation of acetocarmine-reactive factors produced by nuclei and amyloplasts of redifferentiating cells. These factors are absent in nonembryogenic calluses. The alternative origins of ESMs are important to distinguish because the mechanisms by which proembryos are reconstituted and multiplied may contribute to different genotypic and phenotypic variances in regenerated products.
To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allen, G.S. and Owens, J.N., 1972, “The Life History of Douglas-Fir.” Environment Canada, Forestry Service, Ottawa.
Boulay, M.H., Gupta, P.K., Krogstrup, P. and Durzan, D.J., 1988. Conversion of somatic embryos from cell suspension cultures of Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst). Plant Cell Reports, 7:134–137.
Camefort, H., 1969, Fécondation et proembryogénèse chez les Abiétacées (notion de néocytoplasme). Revue Cytologie Biologie Végétales, 32:253–271.
Dogra, P.D., 1984, The embryology, breeding systems and seed sterility in Cupressacea a monograph. In: “Glimpses in Plant Research”, P.K.K. Nair, ed., Vikas House Ltd., Delhi, India.
Durzan, D.J., 1988a, Somatic polyembryogenesis and plantlet regeneration in selected tree crops. Biotech, and Genetic Eng. Revs., 6:339–376.
Durzan, D.J., 1988b, Process control in somatic polyembryogenesis. In: “Molecular Genetics of Forest Trees,” J.-E. Hällgren, ed. Swedish Univ of Agric. Sciences, Dept. Forest Genetics and Plant Physiol., Umeâ, Sweden, Frans Kempe Symp., June 14–16th, Report No. 8, pp. 147–186.
Durzan, D.J. and Durzan, P.E., 1990, Future technologies: Model-reference control systems for the scale-up of embryogenesis and polyembryogenesis in cell suspension cultures. In: “Micropropagation,” P. Debergh and R.H. Zimmerman, eds. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp. 389–426.
Durzan, D.J. and Gupta, P.K., 1987, Somatic embryogenesis and polyembryogenesis in Douglas fir cell suspension cultures. Plant Sci., 52:229–235.
Gupta, P.K. and Durzan, D.J., 1987, Biotechnology of conifer-type somatic polyembryogenesis and plantlet regeneration in loblolly pine. Bio/Tech., 5:147–151.
Gupta, P.K. and Durzan, D.J., 1986, Plantlet regeneration via somatic embryogenesis from subcultured callus of mature embryos of Picea abies (Norway spruce). In Vitro, 22:685–688.
Gupta, P.K., Dandekar, A.M. and Durzan, D.J., 1988, Somatic proembryo formation and transient expression of a luciferase gene in Douglas fir and loblolly pine protoplasts, Plant Sci., 58:85–92.
Hakman, I. and von Arnold, S., 1985, Plantlet regeneration through somatic embryogenesis in Picea abies (Norway spruce). J. Plant Physiol, 121:149–158.
Hakman, I., Fowke, L.C., von Arnold, S. and Ericksson, T., 1985, The development of somatic embryos of Picea abies (Norway spruce). Plant Sci. Letters, 38:53–59.
Klekowski, E.J. Jr., 1988, “Mutation, Developmental Selection, and Plant Evolution.” Columbia Univ. Press, N.Y.
Lindgren, D., 1975, The relationship between self-fertilization, empty seeds and seeds originating from selfing as a consequence of polyembryony. Studia Forestalia Succica, 126:1–24.
Litvay, J.D., Johnson, M.A., Verma, D.C., Einspahr, D.W. and Weyrauch, K., 1981, Conifer suspension culture medium development using analytical data from developing seeds. Inst. Paper Chem. Tech. Pap. Ser., 115:1–17.
Neale, D.B. and Sederoff, R.R., 1988, Inheritance and evolution of conifer organelle genomes. In: “Genetic Manipulation of Woody Plants,” J. W. Hanover and D.E. Keathley, eds. Plenum Press, N.Y.
Singh, H., 1978, “Embryology of Gymnosperms.” Enc. Plant Physiol., Vol. 10, Part 2. Gebrüder, Borntraeger, Berlin.
Sorensen, F.C., 1982, The roles of polyembryony and embryo viability in the genetic systems of conifers. Evolution, 36:725–733.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hong, L., Boulay, M., Gupta, P.K., Durzan, D.J. (1991). Variations in Somatic Polyembryogenesis: Induction of Adventitious Embryonal-Suspensor Masses on Developing Douglas Fir Embryos. In: Ahuja, M.R. (eds) Woody Plant Biotechnology. NATO ASI Series, vol 210. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7932-4_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7932-4_13
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-7934-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-7932-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive