Reflections on Epidemiologic Methodology in the Study of Disease Etiology and Health Services

  • Dimitrios Trichopoulos
  • Loucas Sparos
Conference paper
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 84)


Some epidemiologists have written about the aims and uses of epidemiology, its strengths and limitations, and its achievements and prospects; others have concentrated on the conceptual and methodological aspects of the new discipline. Our objective is, by necessity, more modest; we shall discuss the evolution of epidemiologic methodology and the current thinking on methodology.


Cervical Cancer Therapeutic Measure Epidemiologic Method Belmont Report Population Correlation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anonymous. Interpreting clinical trials. British Medical Journal 2 (1978) 1318.Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous. Defending the controlled trials. Lancet 2 (1980) 731.Google Scholar
  3. Armitage, P. Statistical methods in medical research. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, 1971. Pp. 226–239, 415–425.Google Scholar
  4. Breslow, N. and Day, N. Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume 1. The analysis of case-control studies. IARC Scientific Publications No. 32. Lyon: World Health Organization. International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1980.Google Scholar
  5. Brook, R. H. Quality—Can we measure it? New England Journal of Medicine 296 (1977) 170–172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cancer research campaign working party, trials and tribulations: Thoughts on the organisation of multicentre clinical studies. British Medical Journal 2 (1980) 918–920.Google Scholar
  7. Clarke, E. A. and Anderson, T. W. Does screening by “Pap” smears help prevent cervical cancer? Lancet 2 (1979) 1–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cole, P. The evolving case-control study. Journal of Chronic Diseases 32 (1979) 15–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cole, P. and Morrison, A. S. Basic issues in population screening for cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 64 (1980) 1263–1272.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Commstock, G. W. Uncontrolled ruminations on modern controlled trials. American Journal of Epidemiology 108 (1978) 81–84.Google Scholar
  11. Cook, T. D. and Campbell, D. T. Quasi experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field setting. Chicago, Ill.: Rand McNally College Publishing Co., 1979.Google Scholar
  12. Cornfield, J. A method of estimating comparative rates from clinical data. Applications to cancer of the lung, breast and cervix. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 11 (1951) 1269–1275.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cornfield, J. Randomization by group: A formal analysis. American Journal of Epidemiology 108 (1978) 100–102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Feinstein, A. R. and Landis, R. J. The role of prognostic stratification in preventing the bias permitted by random allocation of treatment. Journal of Chronic Diseases 29 (1976) 277–284.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goujard, J., Crost, M., Delecour, M., Dubois, O., Du Mazaubrun, C., Ponte, C., and Rumeau-Rouquette, C. Transfert des nouveau-ne’s dans la région nord. Facteurs de risque de mortalité des enfants de moins de 2000 g. Archives Françaises de Pédiatrie, (in press).Google Scholar
  16. Greenland, S. and Neutra, R. Control of confounding in the assessment of medical technology. International Journal of Epidemiology 9 (1980) 361–367.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Guzick, D. S. Efficacy of screening for cervical cancer: A review. American Journal of Public Health 68 (1978) 125–133.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Holland, W. W. and Karhausen, L. (eds.) Health Care and Epidemiology. London: Henry-Kimpton, 1978.Google Scholar
  19. Kleinbaum, D., Kupper, L., and Morgenstern, H. Epidemiologic research. Principles and quantitative methods. London: Lifetime Learning Publications, 1982.Google Scholar
  20. Knox, E. G. Control of haemolytic disease of the newborn. British Journal of Preventive and Social Medicine 30 (1976) 163–169.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Knox, E. G. (ed.) Epidemiology in health care planning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  22. Lee, J. A., Morrison, S. L. and Morris, J. N. Fatality from three common surgical conditions in teaching and non-teaching hospitals. Lancet 2 (1957) 785–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lipworth, L., Lee, J. A., and Morris, J. N. Case fatality in teaching and non-teaching hospitals, 1956–59. Medical Care (London) 1 (1973) 71–76.Google Scholar
  24. MacMahon, B. and Pugh, T. Epidemiology. Principles and methods. Boston: Little, Brown, 1970.Google Scholar
  25. MacMahon, B., Pugh, T., and Ipsen, J. Epidemiologic methods. Boston: Little, Brown, 1960.Google Scholar
  26. Mantel, N. and Haenszel, W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 22 (1959) 719–748.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Miettinen, O. Estimability and estimation in case-referent studies. American Journal of Epidemiology 103 (1976) 226–235.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Miettinen, O. S. Public health policy on coronary heart disease. Heart Bulletin 10 (1979) 165–167.Google Scholar
  29. Miettinen, O. and Cook, E. Confounding: Essence and detection. American Journal of Epidemiology 114 (1981) 593–603.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Peto, R., Pike, M. C., Armitage, P., Breslow, N. E., Cox, D. R., Howard, S. V., Mantel, N., McPherson, K., Peto, J., and Smith, P. G. Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. I. Introduction and design. British Journal of Cancer 34 (1976) 585–612.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Peto, R., Pike, M. C., Armitage, P., Breslow, N. E., Cox, D. R., Howard, S. V., Mantel, N., McPherson, K., Peto, J., and Smith, P. G. II. Analysis and examples. British Journal of Cancer 35 (1977) 1–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rothman, K. Causes. American Journal of Epidemiology 104 (1976) 587–592.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Rothman, K. and Boice, J., Jr. Epidemiologic analysis with a programmable calculator. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1979.Google Scholar
  34. Rothman, K., Greenland, S., and Walker, A. Concepts of interaction. American Journal of Epiedemiology 112 (1980) 467–470.Google Scholar
  35. Rumeau-Rouquette, C. Naître en France. 1 vol. INSERM, 1979.Google Scholar
  36. Sackett, D. L. The competing objectives of randomized trials. New England Journal of Medicine 303 (1980) 1059–1060.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schlesselman, J. Case-control studies. Design, conduct, analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  38. Shaw, C. D. Aspects of audit: (1) The background. British Medical Journal 1 (1980) 1256–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. United States. National Commission for the protection of human subjects of biomedical and behavioral research. The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. DHEW, Washington, 1976 (Pub. No. (OS) 78–0013).Google Scholar
  40. WHO Expert Committee. Application of systems analysis to health management. World Health Organization, Technical Report Series No. 596. Geneva, 1976.Google Scholar
  41. Zelen, M. A new design for randomized clinical trials. New England Journal of Medicine 300 (1979) 1242–1245.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dimitrios Trichopoulos
  • Loucas Sparos

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations