Subcortical Mechanisms in Emotional Behavior: Affective Changes Following Septal Forebrain Lesions in the Albino Rat
During the past two decades numerous investigators have been concerned with the role of subcortical mechanisms in emotional behavior. Durable changes in affective behavior have been described for animal preparations with transection of the brain stem at the intercollicular level (Sherringtonian decerebra-tion), neocortical ablation, lesions of the hypothalamus, lesions of the amygdaloid complex, and lesions in various parts of the thalamus (4, 11). Surprisingly little attention has been paid, however, to the behavioral effects of lesions in the septum.
KeywordsStartle Response Septal Lesion Startle Stimulus Conditioned Emotional Response Septal Animal
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Krieg, W. J. S. Personal communication to W. E. Le Gros Clark, in The hypothalamus. London: Oliver & Boyd, 1938.Google Scholar
- 4.Lindsley, D. B. Emotion. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of experimental psychology. New York: Wiley, 1951. Pp. 473–516.Google Scholar
- 5.Schreiner, L. H., Rioch, D. McK., Masserman, J., & Pechtel, C. Behavioral changes following thalamic injury in the cat. J. Neuro-physiol, in press.Google Scholar
- 6.Spiegel, E. A., Miller, H. R., & Oppenheimer, M. J. Forebrain and rage reactions. J. Neuro-physiol., 1930, 3, 538–548.Google Scholar
- 7.Sprague, J. M., & Meyer, M. An experimental study of the fornix in the rabbit. J. Anal., Lona., 1950, 84, 354–368.Google Scholar
- 8.Stone, C. P. Wildness and savageness in rats of different strains. In K. Lashley (Ed.), Studies in the dynamics of behavior. Chicago: Univer. of Chicago Press, 1932. Pp. 3–55.Google Scholar
- 9.Tryon, R. C., Tryon, C. M., & Kuznets, G. Studies in individual differences in maze ability. X. Ratings and other measures of initial emotional responses of rats to novel inanimate objects. J. comp. Psychol, 1941, 32, 417–473.Google Scholar
- 10.Vogt, O. Sur un faisceau septo-thalamique. C. R. Soc. Biol., 1898, Tome L, 206–207.Google Scholar