Biocompatibility of Haemodialysis Membranes

  • Ad van Berlo
  • Daan J. Ellens
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB)

Abstract

At first sight the subject of biocompatibility of haemodialysis membranes seems not to fit in the scope of this book on phospholipid membranes. However, it may be appreciated that in the future crosslinked phospholipid membranes could serve as haemodialysis membranes, because of a resumed excellent biocompatibility. Moreover, the application of biomaterials in haemodialysis gives a vast playing-field for studying the interaction between bio- and artificial membranes. In this paper it will appear that many factors of biomcompatibility of haemodialysis membranes can be related to deformation/destruction of biomembranes.

Keywords

Permeability Cellulose Polysaccharide Histamine Fibril 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bommer J., Wilhelms O.H., Barth H.P., Schindele H. and Ritz E.: Anaphylactoid reactions in dialysis patients role of ethylene oxide. Lancet, pp 1382–1384, 1985Google Scholar
  2. Bosch T., Schmidt B., Samtleben W. and Gurland HJ.: Biocompatibility and clinical performance of a new modified cellulose membrane. Clin. Nephrol., 26, S1, pp 22–29, 1986Google Scholar
  3. Dolovich J., Marshall C.P., Smith E.K.M., Shimuzu A., Pearson F.C., Sugona M.A. and Lee W.: Allergy to ethylene oxide in chronic hemodialysis patients Artif. Organs. 8, pp 334–337, 1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Falkenhagen D. and Klinkmann H.: Bioverträglichkeit In Wetzeis et al. (eds.), Hemodialsye, Peritoneal Dialyse und Membran Plasmapherese, 1986Google Scholar
  5. Fiegel P., Rockel A., Abdelhamid S., Hertel J., Panitz N. and Walb D.: Is Pruritus on RTD associated with ethylene oxide sterilization of dialysis equipment ? In: Proc. Int. Symp. Trondheim. pp 92–96, 1986Google Scholar
  6. Henne W., Dietrich W., Pelger M. and von Sengbusch G.: Residual ethylene oxide in hollow-fiber dialyzers. Artif. Organs. 8, pp 306–309, 1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ing T.S., Daugirdas J.T., Popli S. and Gandhi V.C.: First-use syndrome with cuprammonium cellulose dialyzers. Int. J. Artif. Organs. 6, pp 235–239, 1983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Klinkmann, H.: The 1983 Adam Thomson Lecture: The role of biomaterials in the application of artificial organs. In: J.P. Paul, J.D.S. Gaylor, J.M. Courtney and T. Gilchrist (eds.), Biomaterials in artificial organs, Macmillan Press, London and Basingstoke, pp 1–8, 1984Google Scholar
  9. Leonard E.F.: Dialysis membranes. Proc. EDTA-ERA 21, pp 99–108, 1984Google Scholar
  10. Mahiout A., Meinhold H., Kessel M., Schulze H. and Baurmeister U.: Dialyzer membranes: Effects of surface area and chemical modification of cellulose on complement and platelet activation. Artif. Organs. 11, 2, pp 149–154, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Marshall C., Shimizu A., Smith E.K.M. and Dolovich J.: Ethylene oxide allergy in a dialysis center: prevalence in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis populations. Clin. Nephrol., 21, pp 346–349, 1984PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Nguyen A.T., Lethias C, Zingraff J., Herbelin A., Naret C. and Descamps-Latscha B.: Hemodialysis membrane-induced activation of phagocyte oxidative metabolism detected in-vivo and in-vitro within microamounts of whole blood. Kidn. Int.. 28, pp 158–167, 1985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nicholls A.J. and Platt M.M.: Anaphylactoid reactions due to haemodialysis, haemofiltration of membrane separation. Brit. Med. J.. 285, pp 1607–1609, 1982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nicholls A.J. and Platt M.M.: Anaphylactoid reactions during haemodialysis are due to ethylene oxide hypersensitivity. Proc. EDTA 21, pp 173–176, 1984Google Scholar
  15. Pearson F.C., Bohon J., Lee W., Bruszer G., Sagona M., Dawe R., Jakubowski G., Morrison D. and Dinarello G: Comparison of chemical analyses of hollow-fiber dialyzer extracts. Artif. Organs. 8, 3, pp 291–298, 1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Poothullil J., Shimizu A., Day R.P. and Dolovich J.: Anaphylaxia from the product(s) of ethylene oxide gas. Ann. Intern. Med.. 82, pp 58–60, 1975PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Popli S., Ing T.S., Daugirdas J.T., Kheirbek A.O., Viol G.W., Vilbar R.M. and Gandhi V.G: Severe reactions to cuprophan capillary dialyzers. Artif. Organs. 6, pp 312–315, 1982PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rockel A., Abdelhamid S., Fiegel P., Hertel J., Panitz N. and Walb D.: Clinical relevance of the ethylene oxide radio allergo sorbent test in patients on RDT. In: Proc. Int. Symp. Trondheim. pp 97–104, 1986Google Scholar
  19. Schäfer R.M., Rautenberg W., Neumann S., Heidland A. and Hörl W.: Improvement of dialyzer compatibility by reduction of membrane surface area. Clin. Nephrol. 26 (suppl.), pp 35–38, 1986Google Scholar
  20. Shaldon S., Koch K.M., Dinarello C.A., Colton C.K., Knudsen P.J., Floege J. and Granolleras C: ß-2 Microglobulin and haemodialysis. Lancet, pp 925–926, 1987Google Scholar
  21. Vienken J. and Baurmeister U.: Improved biocompatibility of dialyzers by reduced membrane surface area. Artif. Organs. 11, 3, pp 272–273, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Villarroel F.: Incidence of hypersensitivity in hemodialysis. Artif. Organs. 8, pp 278–280, 1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ad van Berlo
    • 1
  • Daan J. Ellens
    • 1
  1. 1.Organon Teknika N.V.TurnhoutBelgium

Personalised recommendations