Individual Differences in Hemispheric Specialization: Sources and Measurement

  • S. J. Segalowitz
Conference paper
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 130)


When we focus on individual differences in hemispheric specialization, we usually design our experiments to detect these differences as group effects. For example, we may include factors such as those listed in Table 1 in any particular study, and, of course, the list can be expanded at will. Although the factors must, for reasons of statistical analysis, be applied to groups of subjects, we often study them not because we are interested in groups of left handers, or schizophrenics, etc. per se, but rather because we want to make a statement about individuals. The individuals within the group are assumed (or hoped) to be alike on all other variables important for brain lateralization. For practical purposes, this is impossible since it would be impossible to form a group of subjects representing each intersection of all the factors listed. There are probably also sources of individual variation in lateralization tests that are beyond any divisions we have managed to make so far. With this perspective, each individual is seen to be a group unto himself to some extent. An intensive case study of the individual, although possible, and laudable (Dywan & Segalowitz, in press), would not satisfy our curiosity about the factors under examination (cf. Caramazza, 1986). We must remain with the traditional group paradigm, but we are left in the traditional, awkward position of having to accept the individual variation in lateralization not controlled for in our study as error variance.


Test Session Attentional Bias Spatial Task Developmental Dyslexia Verbal Task 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bradshaw, J.L., Gates, A. & Nettleton, N.C. (1977). Bihemispheric involvement in lexical decisions: handedness and a possible sex difference. Neuropsychologia, 15, 277–286.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bradshaw, J., Nettleton, N.C. & Taylor, M.J. (1981). Right hemisphere language and cognitive deficit in sinistrals. Neuropsychologia,19, 113–131.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradshaw, J. & Taylor, M.J. (1979). A word-naming deficit in nonfamilial sinistrals Laterality effects of vocal responses to tachistoscopically presented letter strings. Neuropsychologia,13, 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bryden, M.P. (1965). Tachistoscopic recognition, handedness and cerebral dominance. Neuropsychologia,3, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bryden, M.P. (1978). Strategy effects in the assessment of hemispheric asymmetries. In G. Underwood (Ed.) Strategies of information processing. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bryden, M.P. (1979). Evidence for sex-related differences in cerebral organization. In M. Wittig & A.C. Peterson (Eds.) Sex-related differences in cognitive functioning. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bryden, M.P. & Sprott, D.A. (1981). Statistical determination of degree of laterality. Neuropsychologia,19, 571–581.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Butler, S.R. and Glass, A. (1976). EEG correlates of cerebral dominance. In A.H. Riesen and R.F. Thompson (Eds.) Advances in Psychobiology, vol.3 New York: John Wiley, 219–272.Google Scholar
  9. Caramazza, A. (1986). On drawing inferences about the structure of normal cognitive system from the analysis of patterns of impaired performance: the case for single-patients studies. Brain and Cognition,5, 41–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cattell, R.B. (1963). The structuring of change by P-technique and incremental R-technique. In C.W. Harris (Ed.) Problems in measuring change. Madison: University of Winsconsin Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dywan, J. & Segalowitz, S.J. (1986). The role of the case study in neuropsychological research. In J. Valsinjer (Ed.) The role of the individual subject in scientific psychology. New York: Plenum, in press.Google Scholar
  12. Galaburda, A.M. & Kemper, T.L. (1979). Cytoarchitectonic abnormalities in developmental dyslexia: a case study. Annals of Neurology 6, 94–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Galin, D. & Ornstein, R. (1972). Lateral specialization of cognitive mode: an EEG study. Psychophysiology,95, 412–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Geschwind, N. & Levitsky, W. (1968). Human brain: Left-right asymmetries in temporal speech region. Science,161, 186–187.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gordon, H.W., Frooman, B. & Lavie, P. (1982). Shift in cognitive asymmetries between wakings from REM and NREM sleep. Neuropsychologia,20, 99–103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hannay, H.J. & Malone, D.R. (1976). Visual field effects and short term memory for verbal material. Neuropsychologia,14, 203–209.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heilman, K. (1979). Neglect and related disorders. In K. Heilman & E. Valenstein (Eds.) Clinical Neuropsychology. New York: Oxford. Hier, D.B., Lemay, M., Rosenberger, P.B. & Perlo, V.P. (1978).Google Scholar
  18. Developmental dyslexia: Evidence for a subgroup with a reversal of cerebral asymmetry. Archives of Neurology 35, 90–92.Google Scholar
  19. Inglis, J. & Lawson, J.S. (1981). Sex differences in the effects of unilateral brain damage on intelligence. Science,212, 693–695.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kimura, D. (1980). Sex differences in intrahemispheric organization of speech. Behavioural and Brain Sciences,3, 240–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Klein, R. & Armitage, R. (1979). Rhythms in human performances: 1–1/2-hour oscillations in cognitive style. Science,204. 1326–1328.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lake, D. & Bryden, M.P. (1976). Handedness and sex differences in hemispheric asymmetry. Brain and Language,3, 266–282.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Levine, S.C., Banich, M.T. & Koch-Weser, M. (1984). Variations in patterns of lateral asymmetry among dextrals. Brain and Cognition,3, 317–334.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Levy, J., Heller, W., Banich, M.T. & Burton, L. (1983). Are variations among right-handers in perceptual asymmetries caused by characteristic arousal differences between hemispheres? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 329–359.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McGlone, J. (1980). Sex differences in human brain asymmetry: a critical survey. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences,3, 215–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McKeever, W.F. & Jackson, T.L. (1979). Cerebral dominance assessed by object- and color-naming latencies: sex and familial sinistrality effects. Brain and Language,7, 175–190.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McKeever, W.F., VanDeventer, A.D. & Suberi, M. (1973). Avowed, assessed and familial handedness and differential processing of brief sequential and nonsequential visual stimuli. Neuropsychologia,11, 235–238.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moore, W.H., Jr. (1979). Alpha hemispheric asymmetry of males and females on verbal and nonverbal tasks: some preliminary results. Cortex, 15, 321–326.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Moore, W.H. & Haynes, W.O. (1980). A study of alpha hemispheric asymmetries for verbal and nonverbal stimuli in males and females. Brain and Language,9, 338–349.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ogilvie, R. & Segalowitz, S.J. (1975). The effect of 20% sleep reduction upon mood, learning and performance measures. Sleep Research, 4, 242.Google Scholar
  31. Ojemann, G.A. (1983). Brain organization for language from the perspective of electrical stimulation mapping. Behavioural and Brain Sciences,6, 189–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ornstein, R., Johnstone, J., Herron, J., and Swencionis, C. (1980). Differential right hemisphere engagement in visuospatial tasks. Neuropsychologia, 18, 49–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Orsini, D.L., Lewis, R.S. & Satz, P. (1985). Expressive vs. receptive language functions with regards to sex and handedness differences in cerebral lateralization. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  34. Piazza, D.M. (1980). The influence of sex and handedness in the hemispheric specialization of verbal and nonverbal tasks. Neuropsychologia, 18, 163–176.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Porac, C., Coren, S. & Duncan, P. (1980). Life-span age trends in laterality. Journal of Gerontology,35, 715–721.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Rasmussen, T. & Milner, B. (1977). The role of early left-brain injury in determining lateralization of cerebral speech functions. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,299, 355–369.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rubens, (1977). Anatomical asymmetries of human cerebral cortex. In S. Harnad, Doty, R., Goldstein, L., Jaynes, J & Krauthamer, G. Lateralization in the Nervous System. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  38. Ross, P. & Turkewitz, G. (1981). Individual differences in cerebral asymmetries for facial recognition. Cortex,17, 199–214.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Segalowitz, S.J. (1983). Two sides of the brain. Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  40. Segalowitz, S.J. (1986). Validity and reliability of noninvasive measures of brain lateralization. In J. Obrzut & D. Hines (Eds.) Child Neuropsychology: Empirical Issues. New York: Academic Press, in press.Google Scholar
  41. Segalowitz, S.J. & Bryden, M.P. (1983). Individual differences in hemispheric representation of language. In Segalowitz (ed.) Language Functions and Brain Organization. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  42. Segalowitz, S.J. & Orr, C. (1981). How to measure individual differences in brain lateralization: demonstration of a paradigm. International Neuropsychological Society, (February).Google Scholar
  43. Smokier, I.A. & Shevrin, H. (1979). Cerebral lateralization and personality style. Archives of General Psychiatry,36, 949–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tyler, S.K. & Tucker, D.M. (1982). Anxiety and perceptual structure: individual differences in neuropsychological function. Journal of Abnormal Psychology,9, 210–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Varney, N.R. & Benton, A.L. (1975). Tactile perception of direction in relation to handedness and familial handedness. Neuropsychologia,13, 449–454.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Winer, B.J. (1971). Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. Second edition. New York: McGraw-Hill (Cattelll, 1963).Google Scholar
  47. Witelson, S.F. (1985). The brain connection: the corpus callosum is larger in left-handers. Science,229, 665–668.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zurif, E. & Bryden, M.P. (1969). Familial handedness and left-right differences in auditory and visual perception. Neuropsychologia,7, 179–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. J. Segalowitz
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyBrock UniversitySt. CatharinesCanada

Personalised recommendations