Divorce has an obvious and dramatic effect on the children of the dissolved union. In addition to all the other traumas involved in the dissolution process, the child must face a situation in which the availability and nurturance of both parents will be severely curtailed. As a rule divorce results in the child’s living with one or the other parent. That parent is given custody of the child, which means that he or she is responsible for the welfare, health, and control of that child. The other parent may see the child infrequently or not at all. In the majority of divorces, the parents are able to resolve the issue of their children’s custody more or less amicably. Not infrequently, however, both parents demand custody of the child. When parents cannot resolve this dispute on their own, the issue must be settled in court.
KeywordsMold Stake Ethos
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- M. G. Goldzband, “Child Custody: The Ugliest Litigation: A Guarded Word of Wel¬come,” Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law 4, no. 3 (1976): 101–104.Google Scholar
- J. Areen, Family Law ( Mineola, N.Y.: Foundation Press, 1978 ).Google Scholar
- R. Shepherd, “Solomon’s Sword: Adjudication of Child Custody Questions,” University of Richmond Law Review 8 (1974): 151–200.Google Scholar
- A. Watson, “The Children of Armageden: Problems of Custody Following Divorce,” Syra¬cuse Law Review 2, no. 55 (1969): 80.Google Scholar
- A. M. Levy, “Child Custody Determination—a Proposed Psychiatric Methdology and Its Resultant Case Typology,” Journal of Psychiatry and Lazo, Summer 1978, pp. 189–214.Google Scholar
- R. Solow and P. Adams, “Custody by Agreement: Child Psychiatrist as Child Advocate,” Journal of Psychiatry and Law, Spring 1977, pp. 77–101Google Scholar
- T. A. Rodgers, “The Crisis of Custody: How a Psychiatrist Can Be of Help,” Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 4, no. 3 (1976): 114–19.Google Scholar