Gamma Ray Energy vs. Particle Energy Measurements

  • C. P. Browne
Conference paper


This work is concerned with the consistency of energy scales used in nuclear reaction energy measurements. It is part of our contiuing program on the comparison of energy standards. In earlier work we compared the energy of the alpha particles from 210Po with the threshold energy of the 7Li(p,n)7Be threshold and with other energies. You may recall that an apparent discrepancy of mass values obtained from mass spectroscopy measurements with those from Q-value measurements was resolved by bringing the Po-α energy into agreement with the Li(p,n) threshold. This was accomplished both through our direct comparison and through improved measurements made in other laboratories on the absolute values of these two energies. Figure 1, taken from my report [1] at the Second International Mass Conference reviews the situation. The lower portion of the figure shows values from measurements of the Po-α energy, the upper portion shows comparisons with the energy of α-particles from RaC’, and the central portion shows comparisons with the 7Li(p,n)7Be threshold. The absolute value of the energy of the α-particles from 210Po is known to 0.01% and this is consistent with the 7Li(p,n) threshold to the same accuracy.


Excitation Energy Alpha Particle Particle Measurement Energy Standard Tandem Accelerator 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    BROWNE, C. P., in Proceedings of the Second International Con-ference on Nuclidic Masses, edited by W. H. Johnson ( Springer Verlag, Wien, 1964 ), p. 234Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    MARION, J. B., Revs. Mod. Phys. 33, 139 (1961)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    HEATH, R. L., in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Atomic Masses, edited by R. C. Barber ( Univ. of Manitoba Press, Manitoba, 1967 ), pp. 251–277Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    MARION, J. B., Gamma-Ray Calibration Energies, Univ. of Maryland Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, College Park (1968), Tech. Report 656Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    MURRAY, G., GRAHAM, R. L., and GEIGER, J. S., Nucl. Phys. 45, 177 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    BROWNE, C. P. and MICHAEL, I., Phys. Rev. 134, B133 (1964)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    BROWNE, C. P. and STOCKER, H., Phys. Rev. C4, 1481 (1971)ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    ALBURGER, D. E. and WILKINSON, D. H., Phys. Rev. C3, 1492 (1971)ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    BROWNE, C. P., MAILLE, G., TARARA, R. and DURAY, J. R., Nucl. Phys. A153, 289 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    MURRAY, G., GRAHAM, R. L. and GEIGER, J. S., Nucl. Phys. 63, 353 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reidy, J. J. (to be published)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    STOCKER, H., ROLLEFSON, A. A., HREJSA, A. F. and BROWNE, C. P., Phys. Rev. 4, 930 (1971)ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    STOCKER, H., ROLLEFSON, A. A. and BROWNE, C. P., Phys. Rev. C4, 1028 (1971)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    CHASMAN, C., JONES, K. W., RISTINEN, R. A. and ALBURGERD. E. Phys. Rev. 159, 830 (1967)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    KOLATA, J. J., AUBLE, R. and GALONSKY, A., Phys. Rev. 162, 957 (1967)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Company Ltd 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. P. Browne
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsUniversity of Notre DameNotre DameUSA

Personalised recommendations