Problems Connected with Calculations of Atomic Masses from Experimental Data
In many respects, the techniques used in preparing the 1971 Atomic Mass Evaluation (1–4) were taken from the several papers relating to the 1964 Atomic Mass Adjustment (5–7) and the 1961 Atomic Mass Adjustment (8,9). Indeed, the connections are very close, in that one of the authors (A. H. Wapstra) of the ‘71 version was also an author of the ‘64 and ‘61 adjustments and both authors of the ‘71 version benefited from frequent assistance of the Mainz group. Research supported in part by the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission under contract with the Union Carbide Corporation.
KeywordsNuclear Data Normal Matrix Atomic Energy Commission Fundamental Constant Data Card
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.WAPSTRA, A. H. and GOVE, N. B., The 1971 Atomic Mass Evaluation, Part II, Nuclear Reaction and Separation Energies, Nuclear Data 299 (1971).Google Scholar
- 3.WAPSTRA, A. H. and GOVE, N. B., Evaluation of Input Values; Adjustment Procedures, Nuclear Data 9, 355 (1971).Google Scholar
- 4.GOVE, N. B. and WAPSTRA, A. H., Systematics of Separation and Decay Energies, Nuclear Data 9, 455 (1971).Google Scholar
- 5.MATTAUCH, J. H. E., THIELE, W. and WAPSTRA, A. H., 1964 Atomic Mass Table, Nuclear Physics 6, 1 (1965).Google Scholar
- 6.MATTAUCH, J. H. E., THIELE, W. and WAPSTRA, A. H., Consistent Set of Q-Values, Nuclear Physics 61, 32 (1971).Google Scholar
- 9.KONIG, L. A., MATTAUCH, J. H. E. and WAPSTRA, A. H., 1961 Nuclidic Mass Table, Nuclear Physics 31, 18 (1962).Google Scholar