Advertisement

Masses of 36K, 80,82Rb from Thresholds for (p,n) Reactions and Coulomb Energy Systematics Near A=36

  • A. A. Jaffe
  • G. A. Bissinger
  • S. M. Shafroth
  • T. A. White
  • T. G. Dzubay
  • F. Everling
  • D. W. Miller
  • D. A. Outlaw

Abstract

There is now a large amount of data on (p,n) thresholds, many of which have been determined by observing the yield of positron activity as a function of bombarding energy.(1) However none of the three (p,n) thresholds reported here had been previously measured. The 36Ar(p,n)36K threshold would allow a gap in Coulomb-displacement energy systematics to be filled and the 80,82Kr(p,n)80,82Rb thresholds would permit, in conjunction with other information, the prediction of disintegration energies for 78Rb and 82Y which are far off the stability line.

Keywords

Reaction Threshold Beta Spectrum Disintegration Energy 82Kr Reaction Positron Activity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    FREEMAN, J. M., JENKIN, J. G., MURRAY, G. and BURCHAM, W. E., Phys. Rev. Letters 16, 959 (1966).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    TILLMAN, P. W. and JAFFE, A. A., unpublished, 1970.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    KELSON, I. and GARVEY, G. T., Phys. Letter 23, 689 (1966).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    BERG, R. E., SNELGROVE, J. L., and KASHY, E., Phys. Rev. 153, 1165 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    MATLOCK, R. G., Ph.D. thesis, University of Colorado, 1965 (unpublished).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    DZUBAY, T. G., et al., Phys. Letters 33B, 302. (1970).ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    NEWSON, H. W., PURSER, F. O., ROBERSON, N. R., BILPUCH, E. G., WALTER, R. L, and LUDWIG, E. J., Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 14, 533 (1969).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    OVERLEY, J. C., PARKER, P. D., and BROMLEY, D. A., Nucl. Instr. Methods 68, 61 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    WAPSTRA, A. H. and GOVE, N. B., Nucl. Data Tables, 9, No. 4–5 (1971).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    ENDT, P. M. and VAN DER LEUN, C., Nucl. Phys. A105, 1 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    CERNY, J., Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 16, 530 (1971).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    BASKIN, A. B., JOYCE, J. M., SHAFROTH, S. M., and WHITE, T. A., Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 15, 1346 (1970).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    HOFF, R. W., HOLLANDER, J. M., and MICHEL, M. C., J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 18, 1 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    BECK, E. Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 76, 77 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    ARTNA, A., Nucl. Data lb, No. 4 (1966).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    RAMAN, S. and PINAJIAN, J.J., Nucl. Phys. Al25, 129 (1969).ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    EVERLING, F., COVE, N. B., and VAN LIESHOUT, R., Nucl. Data Sheets, National Academy of Sciences National Research Council, Washington, D. C., pages NRC-61-3-142 through 149 (1961).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    LADENBAUER-BELLIS, I. M. and BAKHUA, H., Phys. Rev. 180, 1015 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    DZHELEPOV, B. S., et al., 21st Moscow Conf. Abstr. p. 51 (1971).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Company Ltd 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. A. Jaffe
    • 1
    • 2
  • G. A. Bissinger
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. M. Shafroth
    • 1
    • 2
  • T. A. White
    • 1
    • 2
  • T. G. Dzubay
    • 3
    • 4
  • F. Everling
    • 5
    • 6
  • D. W. Miller
    • 5
    • 6
  • D. A. Outlaw
    • 5
    • 6
  1. 1.University of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA
  2. 2.Triangle Universities Nuclear LaboratoryDurhamUSA
  3. 3.Duke UniversityDurhamUSA
  4. 4.TUNLDurhamUSA
  5. 5.North Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  6. 6.TUNLDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations