Advertisement

Static and Dynamic Fatigue Behavior of Glass Filament-Wound Pressure Vessels at Ambient and Cryogenic Temperatures

  • M. P. Hanson
Part of the Advances in Cryogenic Engineering book series (ACRE, volume 17)

Abstract

Glass fibers have shown outstanding strength and strength-to-density ratio properties that make their application to pressure vessels particularly attractive. The application has been generally in the form of filament-wound glass-reinforced plastic [1]. However, after extended periods of static or dynamic loading at ambient temperatures, the rate of strength-degradation of filament-wound glass-reinforced plastic pressure vessels has been high compared with that of metallic pressure vessels [2]. Under stress, the resin matrix generally cracks or crazes [3,4] which exposes the glass fibers to atmospheric moisture causing degradation of the fibers. At cryogenic temperatures, however, the moisture problem is reduced, and an improvement in fatigue properties would be expected. Furthermore, the glass strength increases significantly as the temperature is lowered [4].

Keywords

Fatigue Crack Pressure Vessel Liquid Nitrogen Temperature Cryogenic Temperature Plastic Cylinder 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    E. E. Morris, J. Materials, 4 (4): 970 (1969).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. J. Soltysiak and J. M. Toth, Jr., “Static Fatigue of Fiber Glass Pressure Vessels from Ambient to Cryogenic Temperatures,” Reinforced Plastics International,Society of the Plastics Industries, Inc. (1967), p. 14-E. l.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. J. Broutman and S. Sahu, in: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Technical Conference,Society of the Plastics Industry (1969), p. 11-D.1.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    F. J. McGarry and A. M. Willner, in: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Technical Conference,Society of the Plastics Industry (1968), p. 14-B-1.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. P. Hanson, H. T. Richards, and R. O. Hickel, “Preliminary Investigation of Filament-Wound Glass-Reinforced Plastics and Liners for Cryogenic Pressure Vessels,” NASA TN D-2741 (1965).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    F. J. Schmidt and I. J. Hess, Plating, 53 (2): 229 (1966).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. P. Hanson, “Glass-, Boron-, and Graphite-Filament-Wound Resin Composites and Liners for Cryogenic Pressure Vessels,” NASA TN D-4412 (1968).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    K. E. Hofer, Jr. and E. M. Olsen, “An Investigation of the Fatigue and Creep Properties of Glass Reinforced Plastics for Primary Aircraft Structures,” Rept. IITRI-M6104, IIT Research Institute (Apr. 1967). (Available from’DDC as AD-652415.)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. T. Hoggatt and L. J. Workman, “Liners for Nonmetallic Tanks,” Boeing Co., NASA CR-54868 (Jan. 1966).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    F. Wolff and T. Siuta, ARS J., 32 (6): 948 (1962).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. P. Hanson
    • 1
  1. 1.NASA Lewis Research CenterClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations