Advertisement

Looking Harder and Finding Less—Use of the Computer in Petroleum Exploration

  • John C. Davis
Part of the Computer Applications in the Earth Sciences book series (CAES)

Abstract

The decade of the 70’s was marked by steady, if unspectacular, progress in the use of computers by the petroleum industry. Digital seismic processing in the field of geophysics was the single most significant development, and promises to alter many basic procedures in exploration. Programs and techniques for computer mapping have improved significantly during the decade; contour mapping now is probably the most important application of computers to geologic aspects of petroleum exploration. Data banks have grown tremendously, and rapid interactive retrieval systems permit display of combined seismic and geologic information as maps and cross sections. Minicomputer systems are promising to bring dramatic changes to log-interpretation procedures and to the making of subsurface lithofacies maps, increasingly valuable exploration tools for defining stratigraphic traps. Computational advances in the area of petroleum resource assessment allow modeling of economic potential for large areas. These techniques include both economic and geologic considerations.

Data banking, log analysis, and contour mapping are extremely basic procedures, routinely required for almost all exploration activities. Aside from the more exciting geophysical applications, the use of computers in petroleum exploration seems to have advanced during the past decade through the determined refinement of such basic techniques.

Keywords

Acoustic Impedance Stratigraphic Trap Triangular Mesh Petroleum Exploration Seismic Line 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ACI, 1971, Contouring with faulting: Applications Consultants, Inc., Houston, Texas, 36 p.Google Scholar
  2. Akers, H., Jr., 1917, Monte Carlo range-of-values program description: Internal Memorandum [May 1977], Conservation Division, U.S. Geol. Survey, 73 p.Google Scholar
  3. Becquey, M., Lavergne, M., and Willm, C., 1979, Acoustic impedance logs computed from seismic traces: Geophysics, v. 44, no. 9, p. 1485–1501.Google Scholar
  4. Berlanga, J.M., 1979, Oil exploration outcome probabilities in the Tabasco Basin, Mexico, as estimated by use of seismic information: unpubl. doctoral dissertation, Stanford Univ., 120 p.Google Scholar
  5. Bornemann, E., 1979, Well-log analysis as a tool for lithofacies determination in the Viola Limestone (Ordovician) of south-central Kansas: unpubl. doctoral dissertation, Syracuse Univ., 151 p.Google Scholar
  6. Brassel, K.E., and Reif, D., 1979, A procedure to generate Thiessen polygons: Geographical Analysis, v. 11, no. 3, p. 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis, J.C., 1975, Contouring algorithms, in Aangeenbrug, R.T., ed., Auto-Carto II, Proc. Intern. Symp. on Computer-Assisted Cartography: U.S. Dept. Commerce, Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C., p. 352–359.Google Scholar
  8. Davis, J.C., and Harbaugh, J.W., 1980, Comment on oil and gas in offshore tracts: Estimates before and after drilling: Science, v. 209, no. 4460, p. 1047–1048.Google Scholar
  9. Dobrin, M.B., 1980, Computer processing of seismic reflections in petroleum exploration, in Merriam, D.F., ed., Computer applications in the earth sciences, an update of the 70’s: Plenum Press, New York, this volume.Google Scholar
  10. Doveton, J.H., and Cable, H.W., 1979, Fast matrix methods for the lithologic interpretation of geophysical logs, in Gill, D. and Merriam, D.F., eds., Geomathematical and petrophysical studies in sedimentology: Pergamon Press, Oxford, p. 101–116.Google Scholar
  11. Drew, L.J., 1974, Estimation of petroleum exploration success and the effects of resource exhaustion via a simulation model: U.S. Geol. Survey Bull. 1328, 25 p.Google Scholar
  12. Harbaugh, J.W., Doveton, J.H., and Davis, J.C., 1977, Probability methods in oil exploration: John Wiley & Sons, New York, 269 p.Google Scholar
  13. Kaufman, G.M., Balcer, Y., and Kruyt, D., 1975, A probabilistic model of oil and gas discovery, in Haun, J.D., ed., Methods of estimating the volume of undiscovered oil and gas resources: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Studies in Geology No. 1, p. 113–142.Google Scholar
  14. McCullagh, M.J., 1979, Creation and application of variable density grids to oil exploration data (abst.): Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull., v. 63, no. 3, p. 494.Google Scholar
  15. McCullagh, M.J., and Ross, C.G., 1980, The Delaunay triangulation of a random data set: in preparation.Google Scholar
  16. Newendorp, P.D., 1975, Decision analysis for petroleum exploration: Petroleum Publ. Co., Tulsa, Oklahoma, 668 p.Google Scholar
  17. SCA, Inc., 1975, Mapping-contouring system: Scientific Computer Applications, Inc., Tulsa, Oklahoma, 39 p.Google Scholar
  18. Smith, M.B., and Souder, W.W., 1975, Minicomputers for maxi analysis: Soc. Prof. Well Log Analysts, 16th Ann. Logging Symp., R1-13.Google Scholar
  19. Tracy, P.A., 1978, Petroleum Data System-A network of energy information: Proc. 12th Ann. Mtg., Geoscience Information Society, Seattle, Washington, v. 8, p. 25–30.Google Scholar
  20. Uman, M.F., James, W.R., and Tomlinson, H.R., 1979, Oil and gas in offshore tracts: Estimates before and after drilling: Science, v. 205, no. 4405, p. 489–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • John C. Davis
    • 1
  1. 1.Kansas Geological SurveyUSA

Personalised recommendations