Advertisement

The (π+, 2p) Reactions on Nuclei

  • T. Bressani
  • G. Charpak
  • J. Favier
  • L. Massonnet
  • W. E. Meyerhof
  • Č. Zupančič

Abstract

When a slow pion is absorbed in a nucleus by a single nucleon which takes all the available energy, the conservation of energy and momentum requires the nucleon to have a large momentum inside the nucleus before the absorption process. For a pion at rest this momentum would be 500 MeV/c, and it is known that not many nucleons have such high momenta. In the case of an absorption by a pair of nucleons, on the other hand, energy and momenta are easily balanced, the two nucleons going in opposite directions with a high relative momentum and a small momentum of their center of mass. The fact that the absorption by a pair of nucleons is favored makes pion absorption an ideal tool for the study of residual states with two holes in the internal shells.

Keywords

Excitation Energy Momentum Distribution Residual Nucleus Impulse Approximation Recoil Momentum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M. Jean, Proc. Int. Symposium on Direct Interactions and Nuclear Reaction Mechanism, Padua (1962); Nuovo Cim. Suppl. I, 2: 400 (1964).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. Charpak, G. Gregoire, L. Massonnet, J. Saudinos, J. Favier, M. Gusakow and M. Jean, Phy. Letters 16: 54 (1965).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. Charpak, J. Favier, L. Massonnet and Č. Zupančič, Int. Conf. on Nuclear Physics, Gatlinburg, Tennessee, 12–17 Sept. 1966. CERN Preprint 66/1000/5.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    T.I. Kopaleishvili, I.Z. Machabeli, G. Sh. Goksadze and N.B. Krupennikova, Phy. Letters 22: 181(1966).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    T.I. Kopaleishvili, Nucl. Phys. B1: 335 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Favier, T. Bressani, G. Charpak, L. Massonnet, W.E. Meyerhof and Č. Zupančič, Phys. Letters 25B: 409 (1967).ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. Ericson, Phy. Letters 2: 278 (1962).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. Charpak, J. Favier, and L. Massonnet, Int. Conf. on Instrumentation for High-Energy Physics, Stanford, Cal., 9–10 Sept. 1966. CERN Preprint 66/1267/5.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Č. Zupančič, in: “High-Energy Physics and Nuclear Structure,” North-Holland, Amsterdam (1967), p. 171.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Durbin, H. Loar and J. Steinberger, Phys. Rev. 84: 581 (1951).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    B.S. Neganov and L.B. Parfenov, Zh. Eksperim. i Teor. Fiz. 34: (1958), 767; [English transl. Soviet Physics JETP 7: 528 (1958)].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press 1968

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Bressani
    • 1
  • G. Charpak
    • 1
  • J. Favier
    • 1
  • L. Massonnet
    • 1
  • W. E. Meyerhof
    • 1
  • Č. Zupančič
    • 1
  1. 1.CERNGenevaSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations