The Effects of Cyclic Nucleotide Derivatives on Cell Metabolism

  • Bernd Jastorff
Part of the NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series book series (NSSA, volume 44)


Analogs of cAMP and cGMP are commonly used to clarify the role of cyclic nucleotides in cell metabolism. Shortly after Sutherlands discovery of cAMP, chemists started to modify the molecule according the general rules of chemical synthesis1. Already at that time the best known cAMP analog — 6N2 ´ 0-dibutyryl cAMP — was synthesized by Posternak et al. and introduced into biochemical and biological studies. Many chemists from all over the world followed Posternak in the synthesis of analogs and thus up to today more than 600 derivatives of the natural cyclic nucleotides have been reported2. In principle modifications of these molecules can continue endlessly, since the multifunctional character of the nucleotide structure allows unlimited modifications1. Most of the derivatives were synthesized between 1968–1973 by chemists in the pharmaceutical industry, because at that time all the companies searched for a drug based on the structure of a cyclic nucleotide.


Cyclic Nucleotide Amino Acid Side Chain Atom Group cAMP Analog cAMP Receptor Protein 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    B. Jastorff, Nucleotide Analogues, in: “Eucaryotic Cell Function and Growth”, pp 379–390, J. E. Dumont, B. L. Brown and N. J. Marshall, eds., Plenum Publishing Corporation, New York (1976).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. P. Miller, Cyclic Nucleotide Analogues, in: “Cyclic 3’, 5’-nucleotides Mechanisms of Action”, pp 70–105, H. Cramer and J. Schultz, eds., Wiley Cie, London (1978).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. E. Schulz and R. H. Schirmer, in: “Principles of Protein Structure”, Springer Heidelberg (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    W. Kauzmann, Some Facotrs in the Interpretation of Protein Denaturation, Protein Chem., 14: 1–63 (1959).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. M. Konijn, Chemotaxis in the Cellular Slime Moulds, in Primitive Sensory and Communication Systems: the Taxes and Topism of Micro-organisms and Cells, pp 101–153, M. J. Carlisle, ed., Academic Press, London (1975).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. Gerisch and D. Malchow, Cyclic AMP Receptors and the Control of Cell Aggregation in Dictyostelium, Adv. Cyclic Nucleotide Res., Vol. 1, pp 17–31, P. Greengard and G. A. Robinson, eds., Raven Press, New York (1976).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. M. Mato, B. Jastorff, M. Morr and T. M. Konijn, A Model for Cyclic AMP-Chemoreceptor Interaction in Dictyostelium discoideum, Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 544: 309–314 (1978).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    B. Jastorff, J. Hoppe and M. Morr, A Model for the Chemical Interactions of Adenosine 3’,5’-Monophosphate with the R-subunit of Protein Kinase Type 1, Eur. J. Biochem. 101: 555–561 (1979).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernd Jastorff
    • 1
  1. 1.Fachbereich Biologie-ChemieUniversität BremenBremen 33Federal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations