Radiotracer Methods For Determining Utilization of Sedimentary Organic Matter by Deposit Feeders

  • Glenn Lopez
  • Pitiwong Tantichodok
  • I-Jiunn Cheng
Part of the Lecture Notes on Coastal and Estuarine Studies book series (COASTAL, volume 31)


The purposes of this chapter are to evaluate methods to measure ingestion and absorption by deposit feeders of sedimentary organic matter, to consider the assumptions underlying these methods, and to recommend approaches to develop better methods. Deposit feeders acquire food by ingesting large volumes of sediment and absorbing some fraction of the organic matter. Particle-associated microorganisms are generally absorbed well but are not abundant enough in sediment to account for very much of the absorbed organic matter (Cammen, 1980a and this volume; Lopez and Levinton 1987). Deposit feeders are therefore digesting and absorbing some fraction of the detrital sedimentary organic matter. The refractory nature of much of the sedimentary organic matter results in low absorption efficiency. Gravimetric and chemical methods of estimating organic absorption reach their limits of resolution at the lower range of absorption; it is very difficult to distinguish 5% from 0% absorption, although it is obviously of great consequence to the animal. The difficulty in accurately measuring organic absorption by deposit feeders is compounded by selective ingestion of the organic fraction of sediment. Therefore the study of the utilization of sedimentary organic matter by deposit feeders should include methods for accurately determining absorption efficiency and ingestion selectivity.


Fecal Pellet Organic Fraction Absorption Efficiency Sedimentary Organic Matter Deposit Feeder 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Banks, C. W., and L. Wolfinbarger, Jr. 1981. A rapid and convenient method for radiolabelling detritus with [C]acetic anhydride. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 53: 115–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bricelj, V.M. and R. E. Malouf. 1984. The influence of algal and suspended sediment concentrations on the feeding physiology of the hard clam Mercenaria L. Mar. Biol. 84: 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brock, T.D. 1978. The poisoned control in biogeochelnical investigations. pp. 717–725, IN W.G. Krumbein, ed., Environmental Biogeochemistry and Geomicrobiology vol. 3. Ann Arbor Sci., Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  4. Calow, P. and C. R. Fletcher 1972. An new radiotracer technique involving C and Cr for estimating the assimilation efficiency of aquatic primary producers. Oecologia (Berl.), 9: 155–170.Google Scholar
  5. Cammen, L. M. 1980a. The significance of microbial carbon in the nutrition of the deposit feeding polychaete Nereis succinea. Mar. Biol. 61: 9–20.Google Scholar
  6. Canimen, L. M. 1980b. Ingestion rate: An empirical model for aquatic deposit feeders and detritivores. Oecologia (Berl.) 44: 303–310.Google Scholar
  7. Conover, R. J. 1966. Assimilation of organic matter by zooplankton. Limnol. Oceanogr., 11: 338–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Conover, R. J., R. Durvasula, S. Roy and R. Wang. 1986. Probable loss of chlorophyll-derived pigments during passage through the gut of zoo-plankton, and some of the consequences. Limnol. Oceanogr. 31: 878–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crosby, M.P. 1985. The use of a rapid radiolabeling method for measuring ingestion rates for detritivores. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 93: 273–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DeFlaun, M.F. and L.M. Mayer. 1983. Relationships between bacteria and grain surfaces in intertidal sediments. Limnol. Oceanogr. 28: 873–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Foulds, J. B., and K. H. Mann. 1978. Cellulose digestion in Mysis stenolepis and its ecological implications. Limnol. Oceanogr. 23: 760–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hargrave, B. T. 1970. The utilization of benthic microflora by Hyalella azteca. (Amphipoda). J. Anim. Ecol., 39: 427–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hedges, J.I. 1978. The formation and clay mineral reactions of melanoidins. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 42: 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ivlev, V.S. 1939. Transformation of energy by aquatic animals. Int. Rev. den Gesam. Hydrobiol. Hydrograph. 38: 449–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kemp, P.F. 1986. Direct uptake of detrital carbon by the deposit-feeding polychaete Euzonus mucronata. (Treadwell). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 99: 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kiprboe, T. and M. Mohlenberg. 1981. Particle selection in suspension-feeding bivalves. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 4: 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kofoed, L. H. 1975a. The feeding biology of Hydrobia ventrosa. (Montague). I. The assimilation of different components of food. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 19: 233–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kofoed, L. H. 1975b. The feeding biology of Hydrobia ventrosa (Montague). II. Allocation of the components of the carbon budget and the significance of the secretion of dissolved organic material. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 19: 243–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lopez, G.R. and I-J. Cheng. 1982. Ingestion selectivity of sedimentary organic matter by the deposit-feeder Nucula annulata (Bivalvia: Nuculidae). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 8: 279–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lopez, G.R. and I-J. Cheng. 1983. Synoptic measurements of ingestion rate, ingestion selectivity, and absorption efficiency of natural foods in the deposit-feeding molluscs Nucula annulata. (Bivalvia) and Hydrobia totteni (Gastropoda). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 11: 55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lopez, G.R. and M. A. Crenshaw. 1982. Radiolabelling of sedimentary organic matter with 14C-formaldehyde: Preliminary evaluation of a new technique for use in deposit-feeding studies. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 8: 283–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lopez, G.R. and J.S. Levinton. 1987. Ecology of deposit-feeding animals in marine sediments. Quart. Rev. Biol. 62: 235–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Montagna, P.A. 1984. In situ measurement of meiobenthic grazing rates on sediment bacteria and edaphic diatoms. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 18: 119–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Newell, R.I.E. and S.J. Jordan. 1983. Preferential ingestion of organic material by the American oyster Crassostrea virginica. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 13: 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sequi, P. and R. Arenghieri 1977. Destruction of organic matter by hydrogen peroxide in the presence of pyrophosphate and its effects on soil specific surface area. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 41: 340–342.Google Scholar
  26. Tande, K.S. and D. Slagsted. 1985. Assimilation efficiency in herbivorous aquatic organisms—The potential of the ratio method using C and biogenic silica as markers. Limnol. Oceanogr. 30: 1093–1099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tenore, K.R. and R.B. Hanson. 1980. Availability of detritus of different types and ages to a polychaete macroconsumer, Capitella capitata. Limnol. Oceanogr. 25: 553–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wolfinbarger, Jr., L., and M. P. Crosby. 1983. A convenient procedure for radiolabelling detritus with C dimethylsulfate. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 67: 185–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Glenn Lopez
    • 1
  • Pitiwong Tantichodok
    • 1
  • I-Jiunn Cheng
    • 1
  1. 1.Marine Sciences Research CenterState University of New YorkStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations