Antibiotic Sensitivity Testing in Australia and New Zealand

  • S. M. Bell
Part of the Chemotherapy book series (CT, volume 2)


The results of antibiotic sensitivity testing in practice are reviewed on the basis of information collected over a period of six years in the microbiology surveys which are conducted annually for The Royal College of Pathologists of Australia. In 1971 a simple calibrated disc method of sensitivity testing, the features of which are presented, was introduced into the surveys. It was demonstrated over the next three years that a marked improvement in the performance of sensitivity testing in practice resulted from the adoption by all laboratories of this calibrated method. The degree of precision achieved by the laboratories in the application of the uniform method was also studied and attention is drawn to its significance in determining the number of grades of sensitivity which can be reported accurately in practice. The value of collaboration between diagnostic laboratories and laboratories specialising in antibiotic sensitivity testing is discussed and emphasis is given to the need to establish reference centres for antibiotic sensitivity testing.


Sensitivity Testing Resistant Strain Zone Size Sensitive Strain Antibiotic Sensitivity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Annear, D.I. (1968). The effect of temperature on resistance of Staphylococcus aureus to methicillin and some other antibiotics. Med. J. Australia, 1, 444.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Association of Clinical Pathologists (1965). Report on antibiotic sensitivity test trial organized by the Bacteriology Committee of the Association of Clinical Pathologists. J. clin. Path., 18, 1.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bauer, A.W.? Perry, D.M. Kirby, W.M.M. (1959). Single-disk antibiotic-sensitivity testing of staphylococci. Arch. Int. Med., 104, 208.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bauer, A.W., Kirby, W.M.M., Sherris, J.C. Turck, M. (1966). Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Amer. J. Clin. Path., 45, 493.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    College of Pathologists of Australia (1968). A survey of antibiotic sensitivity testing. Med. J. Australia, 2, 171.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ericsson, H., Tunevall, G. Wickman, K. (1960). The paper disc method for determination of bacterial sensitivity to antibiotics. Scandinay. J. Clin Lab. Investigation, 12, 414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ericsson, H.M. Sherris, J.C. (1971). Antibiotic sensitivity testing. Acta Pathol. et Microbiol. Scand., 217 (suppl).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kirby, W.M.M., Yoshihara, G.M., Sundsted, K.S. Warren, J.H. (1957). Clinical usefulness of a single disc method for antibiotic sensitivity testing. Antibiotics Ann., 1956–1957, p. 892.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Petersdorf, R.G. Sherris, J.C. (1965). Methods and significance of in vitro testing of bacterial sensitivity to drugs. Amer. J. Med., 39, 766.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Truck, M., Lindemeyer, R.I. Petersdorf, R.G. (1963). Comparison of single-disc and tube-dilution techniques in determining antibiotic sensitivities of gram-negative pathogens. Ann. Intern. Med., 58, 56.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. M. Bell
    • 1
  1. 1.Bacteriology DepartmentThe Prince of Wales HospitalRandwickAustralia

Personalised recommendations